Title: Qt runs much slower on rh9.
We're in the process of changing over to Red Hat 9 from Red Hat 7.2.
So far we have found one problem with Red Hat 9. The problem is that
Qt runs a lot slower on Red Hat 9. Any advice on the subject would
be appreciated. I noticed that running Qt doesn't
Red Hat 7.2 has QT 2.x, and 9 has QT 3.x. The main difference
between QT 2 and 3 is Unicode support, which can slow things down
a bit. Can you give some numbers or so then?
behdad
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Josh Roden wrote:
We're in the process of changing over to Red Hat 9 from Red Hat 7.2.
So
Yup,
As usual, when it comes to redhat and QT/KDE - shit hit the fans...
Use these RPMS instead:
http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/9/RPMS.stable/
Hetz
On Monday 03 November 2003 13:20, Josh Roden wrote:
We're in the process of changing over to Red Hat 9 from Red Hat 7.2.
So far we
Subject: Re: Qt runs much slower on rh9.
Yup,
As usual, when it comes to redhat and QT/KDE - shit hit the fans...
Use these RPMS instead:
http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/9/RPMS.stable/
Hetz
On Monday 03 November 2003 13:20, Josh Roden wrote:
We're in the process of changing over
On Monday 03 November 2003 14:44, Oleg Kobets wrote:
Hetz,
What's the difference between native rh9 qt and these that you provided ?
And why native rh9 qt is slower ?
If I recall correctly, there were some issues that I have seen before with the
RH 9 QT RPMS - I don't remember exactly the
Josh Roden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We're in the process of changing over to Red Hat 9 from Red Hat 7.2.
So far we have found one problem with Red Hat 9. The problem is that
Qt runs a lot slower on Red Hat 9. Any advice on the subject would
be appreciated.
I can only confirm with an
