On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 09:45 -0700, Nzer Zaidenberg wrote:
Real developers (like me) use gvim and Makefiles like
God intended us to work.
Amen to that!
vim + ctags. period.
We don't use-no-stinking-mouse around here! No sirrie!
lesser beings...
use slickedit or kdevelop.
slickedit cost
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 11:44:11AM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 09:45 -0700, Nzer Zaidenberg wrote:
Real developers (like me) use gvim and Makefiles like
God intended us to work.
Amen to that!
vim + ctags. period.
We don't use-no-stinking-mouse around here! No
On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 12:29 +0300, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 11:44:11AM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 09:45 -0700, Nzer Zaidenberg wrote:
Real developers (like me) use gvim and Makefiles like
God intended us to work.
Amen to that!
vim
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 12:29:14PM +0300, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 11:44:11AM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 09:45 -0700, Nzer Zaidenberg wrote:
Real developers (like me) use gvim and Makefiles like
God intended us to work.
Amen to that!
I use cscope instead of the regular ctags in gvim.
Regards,
tzahi.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gilboa Davara
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2005 10:44 AM
To: IL List
Subject: Re: Quest for *nix C/C++ IDE
On Sun, 2005
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005, Gilboa Davara wrote:
On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 09:45 -0700, Nzer Zaidenberg wrote:
Real developers (like me) use gvim and Makefiles like
God intended us to work.
Amen to that!
vim + ctags. period.
We don't use-no-stinking-mouse around here! No sirrie!
Actually you can use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was very happy with cscope until I started working with kernel. For
some reason, it was totally impossible to work with -- missing whole
directory trees, function definitions, etc. I also tried eclipse, but
the only thing that was able to reliably
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 02:05:49AM +0300, guy keren wrote:
[stuff deleted]
p.s. you will _realy_ want to make sure you're using Makefiles, and not
some proprietary project file format, in order to build your software, and
so you'll want to make sure that any IDE you choose does not lock you
Hello
We're looking for recomendations on *nix IDE.
Following virtues are seeked:
1. Multiplatform. We will develop on Linux and SunOS. Maybe AIX and HP in
the future.
2. Truly integrated. That is, good editor, source browser and visual
debugger in one bottle. Never mind that it will use
Michael
Your IDE options on Linux are a bit limited. Most real programmers seem
to stick with Emacs.
My personal experience with Eclipse is that the IDE is non-standard,
very java and web oriented, slow and prone to crashing.
Having said that, they seem to be making an effort to be
Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What about Eclipse? I think it was designed to satisfy many needs
such as yours. (Though it probably fails on the light item.)
Eclipse is great. It is big, fat, slow, crashes often, does not like
anything the developers did not like in the first place and is also a
Take a look at CRiSP - http://www.vital.com/
The only item in your list below that it does not answer is 3. I don't
now of any IDE that does. Surely that is a debugging function?
Michael Sternberg wrote:
Hello
We're looking for recomendations on *nix IDE.
Following virtues are seeked:
1.
Real developers (like me) use gvim and Makefiles like
God intended us to work.
lesser beings...
use slickedit or kdevelop.
slickedit cost money but rumers says its worth it.
personally i use vi and terminal and debug with dbx
natively :-) but i guess this is not what sane people
would use.
Thanks for your comments, Danny,
codeblocks looks interesting. I'll be checking it out.
Michael
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005, Danny Lieberman wrote:
Michael
Your IDE options on Linux are a bit limited. Most real programmers seem to
stick with Emacs.
My personal experience with Eclipse is that the
On א', 2005-09-04 at 19:26 +0200, Danny Lieberman wrote:
Michael
Your IDE options on Linux are a bit limited. Most real programmers seem
to stick with Emacs.
My personal experience with Eclipse is that the IDE is non-standard,
very java and web oriented, slow and prone to crashing.
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005, Michael Sternberg wrote:
We're looking for recomendations on *nix IDE.
oh, brother... you've opened the un-satisfiable can-of-worms...
Following virtues are seeked:
1. Multiplatform. We will develop on Linux and SunOS. Maybe AIX and HP in
the future.
you forgot one
Guy, Michael
IMHO - Visual C/C++ (the Visual studio 2005 Express version has a free
free download, and is 49$ for the production rls) is head and shoulders
ahead above Eclipse,
cross-development for Linux is just a question of makefiles, and it
DOES work quite well - we went this route a
17 matches
Mail list logo
