On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 11:14 +0200, Oded Arbel wrote:
On Saturday, 12 בNovember 2005 01:32, Gilboa Davara wrote:
About buffer overflow: you are missing the point. You are not
overflowing the host stack, but the VMs one. This actually is good
thing from that point of view.
Um and
On Saturday, 12 בNovember 2005 01:32, Gilboa Davara wrote:
About buffer overflow: you are missing the point. You are not
overflowing the host stack, but the VMs one. This actually is good
thing from that point of view.
Um and once I did that, what prevents me from generating a code
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 11:14:23AM +0200, Oded Arbel wrote:
I'm not sure what the MS guys are doing, but if I were them I would run
the networking code with no file system permissions. The up side of
running everything in a VM(*) is that you don't have to link in file
system operations for
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 20:23 +0200, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
Can you spell php...? cgi?
How many computers ending up running php/cgi? 1% maybe 2%?
How many Windows /desktop/ machines got comprimised since this thread
began...? How can you even begin to compare these two cases.
Perl gets
Microsoft is developing a new O/S in c#- looks like they reincarnated IBM VM in
a 2005 version
Quoting:
The Singularity project http://research.microsoft.com/os/singularity contains new languages and tools, and a whole new architecture and operating system design. Singularity is built around
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 22:48, Danny Lieberman wrote:
Microsoft is developing a new O/S in c#- looks like they reincarnated IBM
VM in a 2005 version
sarcasmSurprisingly enough/sarcasm, Microsoft does a lot of operating
system research. Part of that research is of course thinking up new
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 22:48 +0200, Danny Lieberman wrote:
Microsoft is developing a new O/S in c#- looks like they reincarnated IBM VM
in a 2005 version
Quoting:
The Singularity project http://research.microsoft.com/os/singularity
contains new languages and tools, and a whole new
Gilboa Davara wrote:
They are talking about code isolation and preventing code manipulation,
while their framework devision has designed the hideous .NET framework
that forces people to dynamically generate code just to read raw (?!?!)
TCP (!!!) traffic. (The application devs around me use it
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 18:45 +0200, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
Gilboa Davara wrote:
They are talking about code isolation and preventing code manipulation,
while their framework devision has designed the hideous .NET framework
that forces people to dynamically generate code just to read raw
Gilboa Davara wrote:
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 18:45 +0200, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
Gilboa Davara wrote:
They are talking about code isolation and preventing code manipulation,
while their framework devision has designed the hideous .NET framework
that forces people to dynamically
On 11/10/05, Diego Iastrubni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gilboa Davara wrote:
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 18:45 +0200, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
Didnt you ever program a TCP/IP application in perl...? ;-)
Well, lets say Python, since you can store the compiled binary...
I wrote maybe
11 matches
Mail list logo
