Oleg Goldshmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> perror(strerror(errno));
Oleg's software development rule #1187:
Never try to make your code cuter [ fprintf(stderr,"%s\n", => perror( ]
late at night... Oh, well, no real harm...
;-)
--
Oleg Goldshmidt | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gilad Ben-Yossef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
>
> > Purely from memory, it is POSIX, though I would use STDOUT_FILENO
> > or fileno(stdout).
>
> OK. I see I wasn't clear about what i was asking.
Not to me, but that's my problematic internal parser. Obviously I read
the q
Oron Peled wrote:
On Wed, 09 Jul 2003 16:43:00 +0300
Gilad Ben-Yossef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How would errno help? the operation isn't failing, it's just doesn't
produce stdout. Of course, I'm not sure it guranteed to do that -
this was the whole point of my question... ;-)
We don't really k
On Wed, 09 Jul 2003 16:43:00 +0300
Gilad Ben-Yossef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How would errno help? the operation isn't failing, it's just doesn't
> produce stdout. Of course, I'm not sure it guranteed to do that -
> this was the whole point of my question... ;-)
We don't really know if it doe
Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
Here is the question rephrased:
Will I get the exact same stream handle every time I fdopen file
dscriptor 1?
For example, does the following *guranteed* to work?
#include
#include
int main(void) {
printf("stdout: %lx\n", stdout);
fclose(stdout);
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Can you try the code with STDOUT_FILENO or fileno(stdout) and also
print out some more info, such as errno?
How would errno help? the operation isn't failing, it's just doesn't
produce stdout. Of course, I'm not sure it guranteed to do that - this
was the whole point of
Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote on 2003-07-09:
> void pop_stdout()
> {
> if (Dup_stdout == -1) {
> sprintf(ebuf, "ERROR: pop_stdout: push_stdout never called");
> tet_infoline(ebuf);
> tet_result(TET_FAIL);
> return;
> }
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Purely from memory, it is POSIX, though I would use STDOUT_FILENO
or fileno(stdout).
OK. I see I wasn't clear about what i was asking.
Here is the question rephrased:
Will I get the exact same stream handle every time I fdopen file
dscriptor 1?
For example, does the fol
Gilad Ben-Yossef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now, the question is so simple, I suspect I'm being very dumb about
> something,
Nah...
> Is there some law of the universe (POSIX or otherwise) that
> is supposed to gurantee that when you fdopen file descriptor 1, you'll
> get the stream that eq
Howdie all,
Time for an actual Linux (or at least programming) question :-)
Now, the question is so simple, I suspect I'm being very dumb about
something, but since I can't figure it out I'll have to take my chances
and ask anyways
I have this test program (the vsw5 test suite for the X Wi
10 matches
Mail list logo
