Tomorrow, October 25th at 18:30, Haifux will gather to hear Orr
Dunkelman talk about:
Secure File Systems
Abstract
In this talk I shall cover two concepts related to protecting your
information, cryptographic file system and steganographic file system.
A cryptographic file system
On 4/28/05, Gil Freund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am planning on deploying VMware GSX on a Debian system.
While I am happy with ReiserFS for most FS needs, I am wondering if it
would make sense to user XFS or JFS for the VM image partition, as it
seems both perform better with large
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Gil Freund wrote:
On 4/29/05, guy keren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
perhaps you didn't dig into the thing - it uses the linux system as a
console OS, not as a host OS. the guest machines do not run on top of this
linux system at all. all the device drivers that are
On 4/30/05, guy keren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Gil Freund wrote:
On 4/29/05, guy keren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
consider the differences between suzuky swift and suzuky baleno. the swift
has all the functionality of the baleno - they both have 4 wheels, an
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 03:29:08AM +0300, guy keren wrote:
the ESX product does not work on linux. it works side-by-side with linux
(it is implemented as a set of kernel modules, and the host OS interacts
with these modules directly, not via any host operating system). when you
install ESX,
On 4/29/05, Muli Ben-Yehuda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
encouraged to take a look at the free Xen hypervisor instead. Windowssupport will be coming to Xen when Intel makes its VTx machinespublicly available.
Is there a reason to expect this to happen or is it just a theoretical
pre-condition?
--A
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 05:00:48PM +1000, Amos Shapira wrote:
On 4/29/05, Muli Ben-Yehuda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
encouraged to take a look at the free Xen hypervisor instead. Windows
support will be coming to Xen when Intel makes its VTx machines
publicly available.
Is there a reason
Muli Ben-Yehuda [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What is GSX's architecture?
GSX Server runs as an application in the host OS, ESX runs on baare
metal.
--
Oleg Goldshmidt | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.goldshmidt.org
=
To
Amos Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 4/29/05, Muli Ben-Yehuda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
encouraged to take a look at the free Xen hypervisor
instead. Windows
support will be coming to Xen when Intel makes its VTx machines
publicly available.
Is there a
On 29 Apr 2005 10:38:31 +, Oleg Goldshmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Muli Ben-Yehuda [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What is GSX's architecture?
GSX Server runs as an application in the host OS, ESX runs on baare
metal.
Not quite. ESX uses a highly customized RedHat distribution. While
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Gil Freund wrote:
On 29 Apr 2005 10:38:31 +, Oleg Goldshmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Muli Ben-Yehuda [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What is GSX's architecture?
GSX Server runs as an application in the host OS, ESX runs on baare
metal.
Not quite. ESX uses a
On 4/29/05, guy keren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Gil Freund wrote:
On 29 Apr 2005 10:38:31 +, Oleg Goldshmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Muli Ben-Yehuda [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What is GSX's architecture?
GSX Server runs as an application in the host
Hi,
I am planning on deploying VMware GSX on a Debian system.
While I am happy with ReiserFS for most FS needs, I am wondering if it
would make sense to user XFS or JFS for the VM image partition, as it
seems both perform better with large files.
On a side note, can anyone share information on
] On Behalf Of Gil Freund
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 6:56 PM
To: IGLU Mailing list
Subject: VMware GSX host file systems
Hi,
I am planning on deploying VMware GSX on a Debian system.
While I am happy with ReiserFS for most FS needs, I am
wondering if it would make sense to user XFS
Freund
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 6:56 PM
To: IGLU Mailing list
Subject: VMware GSX host file systems
Hi,
I am planning on deploying VMware GSX on a Debian system.
While I am happy with ReiserFS for most FS needs, I am
wondering if it would make sense to user XFS or JFS
) and virtual tapes (large files) even
without crashes.
Regards,
tzahi.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gil Freund
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 6:56 PM
To: IGLU Mailing list
Subject: VMware GSX host file systems
Hi,
I am
Subject: VMware GSX host file systems
Hi,
I am planning on deploying VMware GSX on a Debian system.
While I am happy with ReiserFS for most FS needs, I am
wondering if it would make sense to user XFS or JFS for the
VM image partition, as it seems both perform better with large files
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 10:52:20PM +0300, Gil Freund wrote:
On 4/28/05, Marc A. Volovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
XFS is optimized for sequential access performance.
Just to clarify, do you mean batch type processing?
Without knowing, I guess Marc meant audio/video, which is a large part
of
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, Gil Freund wrote:
On a side note, can anyone share information on performance of the ESX
product vs. the GSX product on Linux? Aside from memory
over-committing, most ESX functions (such as vMotion) are not relevant
to me.
the ESX product does not work on linux. it
Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 10:52:20PM +0300, Gil Freund wrote:
Just to clarify, do you mean batch type processing?
Without knowing, I guess Marc meant audio/video, which is a large part
of SGI's users.
Yes, indeed. Streaming, mainly video. Worst performance was on
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Shlomi Loubaton wrote:
Does anyone have any recommendations for a compress FS?
.. besides cloop.
Did anyone ever try SquashFS? how is the performance comparing to cloop?
Are there any Read/Write compressed filesystems for Linux?
The two i mentioned above are read
http://e2compr.sourceforge.net/
I'd be happy to hear about your experiences, this is one of those things I really miss
in modern OSes...
(e.g. for ensuring /var or document directories are always compressed...)
Shlomi Loubaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have any recommendations
On Tuesday 02 March 2004 03:39, Shlomi Loubaton wrote:
Does anyone have any recommendations for a compress FS?
.. besides cloop.
Did anyone ever try SquashFS? how is the performance comparing to
cloop?
cramfs has proven very useful for me over time. It's also read only, of
course.
Gilad
Does anyone have any recommendations for a compress FS?
.. besides cloop.
Did anyone ever try SquashFS? how is the performance comparing to cloop?
Are there any Read/Write compressed filesystems for Linux?
The two i mentioned above are read only.
Regards,
Shlomi Loubaton.
Can anyone explain the differences/
definitions of the following FS- ext2, ext3, jfs, xfs
thanks
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, Shai Bentin wrote:
Can anyone explain the differences/ definitions of the following FS-
ext2, ext3, jfs, xfs
You forgot ReiserFS
--
Tzafrir Cohen
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.technion.ac.il/~tzafrir
Quoth Shai Bentin:
Can anyone explain the differences/ definitions of the following FS-
ext2, ext3, jfs, xfs
Also reiserfs, xiafs, ext and minixfs.
Ok, let's give it a try... Note - I am going to describe the filesystem,
not remark on their qualities vis-a-vis each other.
minixfs was the
Oded Arbel wrote:
Hi list.
I'm looking into making all of out linux boxes share files, in a fast,
secure and reliable manner, so I'm looking for a good distributed file
system. the two DFSs that every linux distro comes with do not really fit
the need, AFAIK - NFS has reliability
Hi list.
I'm looking into making all of out linux boxes share files, in a fast,
secure and reliable manner, so I'm looking for a good distributed file
system. the two DFSs that every linux distro comes with do not really fit
the need, AFAIK - NFS has reliability problems, and it has the anoying
Oded Arbel wrote:
rather live w/o. if you have any other suggestion for painlesly synching
users, I'd love to hear about it - something that you wroked with , please),
and Samba and security are two words that don't fit in the same sentence
(oops - Just did it. sorry :-).
Sure. Use LDAP.
30 matches
Mail list logo
