On Wednesday 27 July 2005 00:39, Amos Shapira wrote:
Why not? As long as its owner doesn't care?
There is no law that requires it, and the NTP server operator
can do whatever he/she deems right. However, the way it was
designed to work is below...
From the original NTP RFC1059:
The
On 7/26/05, Amit Aronovitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geoffrey had suggested strat-1 ntp (or GPS) as a measure for avoiding
the system-clock bug discussed here, I think.
I missed this part of the discussion but as far as I can imagine this
would have nothing to do with system-clock bugs. Please
On Monday 25 July 2005 21:40, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
And the netvision server. All seem to sync from that startum 1 server at
HUJI.
No, timeserver.iix.net.il has its own gps.
Hello,
Among the public NTP servers available, none is stratum 1, as stratum 1
should never be made public,
On Tuesday 26 July 2005 01:03, Amos Shapira wrote:
A reverse lookup confirms it's good old relay.huji.ac.il.
I wonder a reverse of what confirms the obviously wrong
fact you stated above. ntp.ac.il (aka ntp.ilan.net.il) is
128.139.6.20, while good old relay.huji.ac.il is 128.139.6.1.
--Ariel
On 7/27/05, Ariel Biener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 25 July 2005 21:40, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
And the netvision server. All seem to sync from that startum 1 server at
HUJI.
No, timeserver.iix.net.il has its own gps.
Hello,
Among the public NTP servers available,
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:36:42 +0300, Amit Aronovitch wrote:
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
I am a Nevtvision customer, they use a GPS unit to give them a stratum
one server. I would avoid the overloaded server at HUJI if at all possible.
Netvision here too - but I see them as stratum 2.
I
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 06:19:02PM +0300, Ehud Karni wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:36:42 +0300, Amit Aronovitch wrote:
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
I am a Nevtvision customer, they use a GPS unit to give them a stratum
one server. I would avoid the overloaded server at HUJI if at all
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 09:06:42PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 06:19:02PM +0300, Ehud Karni wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:36:42 +0300, Amit Aronovitch wrote:
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
I am a Nevtvision customer, they use a GPS unit to give them a stratum
On 7/26/05, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 06:19:02PM +0300, Ehud Karni wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:36:42 +0300, Amit Aronovitch wrote:
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
I am a Nevtvision customer, they use a GPS unit to give them a stratum
one
Ehud Karni wrote:
You can use ntp.ilan.net.il (aka ntp.net.il) - startum 1 (using lab
atomic clocks - not GPS - I think it is more accurate).
Stratum 2 Israeli ntp servers: timeserver.iix.net.il , openu.ilan.net.il .
BTW. Why do you need startum 1 (which telescope do you operate ?).
I'm
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
I am a Nevtvision customer, they use a GPS unit to give them a stratum
one server. I would avoid the overloaded server at HUJI if at all possible.
Netvision here too - but I see them as stratum 2.
I sync to ntp.netvision.net.il (+ 2/3 times europe.pool.ntp.org for
Long ago, On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 12:48:01PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Hi
I have a strange problem here: the system clock of my server keeps
changing.
The following is from the output of 'date' run from the same shell about
1 second apart:
12:13:37
13:25:08
12:13:34
As
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 11:58:36AM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
The following is from the output of 'date' run from the same shell about
1 second apart:
12:13:37
13:25:08
12:13:34
Check your crontabs carefully. Dead Rat included some obscure program to
update your clock
I have not had time to reply earlier, partially due to network problems
here. So here goes...
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 03:02:49PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 02:07:18PM +0200, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005, Tzafrir Cohen wrote about system clock loops
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 03:27:09PM +0200, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Hi
I have a strange problem here: the system clock of my server keeps
changing.
The following is from the output of 'date' run from the same shell about
1 second apart:
12:13:37
13:25:08
Hi
I have a strange problem here: the system clock of my server keeps
changing.
The following is from the output of 'date' run from the same shell about
1 second apart:
12:13:37
13:25:08
12:13:34
As you can see, the clock occasionally loops back (it keeps in the range
12:13:34-38) and
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 12:48:01PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Hi
I have a strange problem here: the system clock of my server keeps
changing.
The following is from the output of 'date' run from the same shell about
1 second apart:
12:13:37
13:25:08
12:13:34
As you can see,
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 01:17:38PM +0200, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 12:48:01PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Hi
I have a strange problem here: the system clock of my server keeps
changing.
The following is from the output of 'date' run from the same shell
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005, Tzafrir Cohen wrote about system clock loops:
The following is from the output of 'date' run from the same shell about
1 second apart:
12:13:37
13:25:08
12:13:34
...
Obviously anything that assumes a steady system clock misbehaves.
Any idea what else may
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 02:07:18PM +0200, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005, Tzafrir Cohen wrote about system clock loops:
The following is from the output of 'date' run from the same shell about
1 second apart:
12:13:37
13:25:08
12:13:34
...
Obviously anything
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Hi
I have a strange problem here: the system clock of my server keeps
changing.
The following is from the output of 'date' run from the same shell about
1 second apart:
12:13:37
13:25:08
12:13:34
As you can see, the clock occasionally loops back (it keeps in the range
Tzafrir, Gilad
It sounds to me like a case of a very sick realtime clock - maybe the
motherboard is sensitive to voltage fluctuations - i think the clock
might be a vco
Are you using ntpd? If not - I would try running ntpd and see if the
problem goes away
Danny
Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
On Monday 21 February 2005 15:51, Danny Lieberman wrote:
It sounds to me like a case of a very sick realtime clock - maybe the
motherboard is sensitive to voltage fluctuations - i think the clock
might be a vco
The RTC has nothing to do with kernel time after boot. It is only
used to
Oron
Thanks - i just learned something. :-)
This is Debian right? Would have thought it would be a widely reported
issue.
It smells like a combination of hardware and kernel related to APIC
The P5 has a local APIC and an I/O APIC for interrupts on SMP - so I
assume there is a kernel patch to
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Oron Peled
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 4:43 PM
To: Danny Lieberman
Cc: Gilad Ben-Yossef; Tzafrir Cohen; Linux-Israel list
Subject: Re: system clock loops
On Monday 21 February 2005 15:51, Danny Lieberman wrote:
It sounds to me like a case of a very sick
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
After many tinkerrings I rebotted the computer to see if it could make
the problem go away. It has. For about an hour or so.
please check that all your fans are working properly and there's no
over-heating.
it smells to me like a hardware problem
26 matches
Mail list logo
