On Sat, 20 Dec 2003, Dovix wrote:
Numbering is really not an issue. See, it can always
start at 3.0 as the first stable version. That
practice worked quite well with NT ;)
By that time Linux may still be at 2.8, and if for
some reason Linus will decide to go for the magic
Number 3.0, Hurd
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Meir Kriheli wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 19 December 2003 21:10, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
A Microsoft networking division manager has been contacting LUGs
(including LUGoD) regarding what appear to be focus groups concerning
where
http://optusxmas.optin.com.au/cgi-bin/FormGenerator?rin=169440753-11900567t
hankyou=/optusxmas/flash/penguin1.html
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
I second you indeed.
behdad
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Shlomi Fish wrote:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Meir Kriheli wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 19 December 2003 21:10, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
A Microsoft networking division manager has been contacting LUGs
Another approach is for Hurd to implement interfaces, which will allow
it to use Linux drivers (this approach is almost as heretical as
developing a layer for allowing Linux to use NDIS-compatible drivers).
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Shlomi Fish wrote:
On Sat, 20 Dec 2003, Dovix wrote:
Numbering
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 07:46:56AM +0200, Official Flamer/Cabal NON-Leader wrote:
Aha! Yes, that is correct - this will print \thepage on first page.
Ok - three solutions:
0. use [titlepage]
1. use book or report as class
2. use fancyhdr
As I already wrote, \usepackage{nopageno} is the
docbook is hardly something that no one knows anything about it. You can always read
the docbook book (or by it) and it is indeed a very sophisticated document creation
system that far exceeds in depth and flexibility any WYSIWYG systems.
You can generate the output in multiple forms, such as
I was joking of course, about version numbers. That's why I added the [OT].
Funny, but it is a common knowledge that M$ apps become usable after their third
version, and starting NT from 3.x didn't change that paradigm. I have the feeling that
The Hurd will be fine WHEN and IF it is finally
21 2003, 07:20,Behdad Esfahbod:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
linux? what linux?
in 5 years i would like to use the hurd! :)
What does the hypothetical hurd has promised you to do that you
like to use it? Is it the name that is better than linux? IMHO
forget about
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Oded Arbel wrote:
21 2003, 07:20, ?? ??? ?? Behdad Esfahbod:
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
linux? what linux?
in 5 years i would like to use the hurd! :)
What does the hypothetical hurd has promised you to do
My system could help you, though note that it is much less sophisticated than
docbook and/or Borges, is still being updated from time to time (i.e. the XSL is still
a mess as I'm learning the technology while writing it), supports only HTML generation
and the documentation is still not
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 07:46:56AM +0200, Official Flamer/Cabal NON-Leader wrote:
Quoth Micha Feigin:
But the following isn't:
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
\title{Title}
\author{Author}
\maketitle
Aha! Yes, that is correct - this will print \thepage on
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 11:34:46AM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 07:46:56AM +0200, Official Flamer/Cabal NON-Leader wrote:
Aha! Yes, that is correct - this will print \thepage on first page.
Ok - three solutions:
0. use [titlepage]
1. use book or report as class
2.
I wonder, does anyone here have experience / heard of someone with experience /
would like to share his wild guesses / about registring domain names in China?
And no, I do not plan to initiate an offshore spam-spredding business there.
Are there special things to worry about? Will just any
21 2003, 14:52,Shlomi Fish:
since Mandrake 7.2 I never had to re-compile the kernel, except
UML kernels for kernel development
HURD offers something very interesting in this areana: you won't need UML with
HURD because each user can run her own drivers/filesystems/etc or even a full
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Oded Arbel wrote:
21 2003, 14:52, ?? ??? ?? Shlomi Fish:
since Mandrake 7.2 I never had to re-compile the kernel, except
UML kernels for kernel development
HURD offers something very interesting in this areana: you won't need UML with
21 2003, 19:41,Shlomi Fish:
Is the situation considerably better in x86-based BSD systems?
Not AFAIK. marginly better I mightsay.
Hmmm... so it's not as much a problem of Linux as it is the problem of the
wacky i386 architecture. And since Linux has to run there,
I think that it
21 2003, 19:42,Gilad Ben-Yossef:
On Sunday 21 December 2003 18:37, Oded Arbel wrote:
HURD offers something very interesting in this areana: you won't need UML
with HURD because each user can run her own drivers/filesystems/etc or
even a full kernel on a running system w/o affecting
21 2003, 18:37,Oded Arbel:
BTW - as Debian GNU/Hurd have been mentioned here, here are the
installation instruction if anybody wants to try it out.
http://www.debian.org/ports/hurd/hurd-install
Correction- don't use that manual. look for a debian package called crosshurd.
AFAIU
Quoth Dan Kenigsberg on Sun, Dec 21, 2003:
I wonder, does anyone here have experience / heard of someone with experience /
would like to share his wild guesses / about registring domain names in China?
Google would:
http://www.cnnic.net.cn/en/index/index.htm
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 02:17:29AM -0800, Dovix wrote:
I was joking of course, about version numbers. That's why I added the [OT].
Funny, but it is a common knowledge that M$ apps become usable after
I would say barely usable, not usable. Taking win 3.11 as an example ;-)
Actually when
21 matches
Mail list logo
