You mentioned FreeNX but from my experience the proprietary version is still
light years ahead (http://www.nomachine.com/).
It will definitely serve actual desktop sessions as well.
Very low hassle to configure and should work out of the box.
Tom
2011/10/17 Guy Tetruashvyly guy@gmail.com
On 10/17/2011 12:21 AM, Tom Goren wrote
You mentioned FreeNX but from my experience
the proprietary version is still light years ahead (http://www.nomachine.com/).
It will definitely serve actual desktop sessions as well.
Very low
They have a 'free' edition:
http://www.nomachine.com/select-package.php?os=linuxid=1
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Guy Tetruashvyly guy@gmail.com wrote:
**
On 10/17/2011 12:21 AM, Tom Goren wrote
You mentioned FreeNX but from my experience the proprietary version is
still light
On 10/17/2011 01:16 AM, Tom Goren wrote :
They have a 'free' edition:
http://www.nomachine.com/select-package.php?os=linuxid=1
That is true, but the free version will act as a terminal
server , rather then
Hi,
I have a gcc-related question. Problematic platform is Fedora 15 with
gcc 4.6.1, as well as Fedora 14 with gcc 4.5.1.
I am used to keeping RCS/CVS/SVN keywords (e.g., $Id$) in all my code.
In the case of C/C++ this normally amounts to
static const char foo_src_id[] = $Id$;
in the source
2011/10/17 Guy Tetruashvyly guy@gmail.com
**
On 10/17/2011 01:16 AM, Tom Goren wrote :
They have a 'free' edition:
http://www.nomachine.com/select-package.php?os=linuxid=1
That is true, but the free version will act as a terminal server , rather
then presenting you your real
Hi Oleg,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 06:29:58PM +0200, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
...
Now, put the above line in a C or C++ file, say foo.cc, and do the
following:
$ g++ -g -O2 foo.cc -c -o foo.o
$ ident foo.o
foo.o:
$Id: foo.cc 673 2011-10-17 09:48:11Z oleg $
This works up to and
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote about Newer gcc swallow version
control keywords:
static const char foo_src_id[] = $Id$;
I remember many years ago (when I was probably still using SCCS with its %..%
macros, and SCCS's what(1) instead of ident(1)), there was already an argument
on
On 10/17/2011 06:29 PM, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Hi,
I have a gcc-related question. Problematic platform is Fedora 15 with
gcc 4.6.1, as well as Fedora 14 with gcc 4.5.1.
I am used to keeping RCS/CVS/SVN keywords (e.g., $Id$) in all my code.
In the case of C/C++ this normally amounts to
Nadav Har'El n...@math.technion.ac.il writes:
In any case, because there was always a fear that the compiler might
optimize these out, someone invented a new directive, #ident, as in:
#ident $Id$
This has always been there, but it has never been standard, AFAIK. It
is not a GCC extension,
Baruch Siach bar...@tkos.co.il writes:
The -O2, as well as -O and -Os, gcc options enable a set of specific
optimizations that can each be turned off. The full list is at
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.6.1/gcc/Optimize-Options.html. Just
go over this list and disable each optimization,
Shachar Shemesh shac...@shemesh.biz writes:
Leaving aside the question of whether that is a good idea
This saved my butt enough times in the past that I think it is ;-)
- did you try
changing that to:
static const volatile char foo_src_id[] = $Id$;
Hmm... const volatile hadn't occurred to
On 10/17/2011 10:29 PM, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
- did you try
changing that to:
static const volatile char foo_src_id[] = $Id$;
Hmm... const volatile hadn't occurred to me before, but I have just
tried it and it did not work.
Just tested it myself. It does, indeed, not work. I wonder why?
Shachar Shemesh shac...@shemesh.biz writes:
Just tested it myself. It does, indeed, not work. I wonder why?
Seems like it SHOULD work. After all, that's what volatile is for,
right?
I suspected that const was more important than volatile, but it looks
(after I removed const) that what
Shachar Shemesh wrote on Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 22:47:49 +0200:
On 10/17/2011 10:29 PM, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
- did you try
changing that to:
static const volatile char foo_src_id[] = $Id$;
Hmm... const volatile hadn't occurred to me before, but I have just
tried it and it did not work.
Nadav Har'El n...@math.technion.ac.il writes:
#if (__GNUC__ = 4) (__GNUC_MINOR__ 4)
#define USED(x) x __attribute__((used))
#else
#define USED(x) x
#endif
#define IDENT(x) static const char USED(foo_src_id[]) = x;
and then in each file just do
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-04/msg01429.html
I do have three suggestions for you:
1) The current way to tell the compiler not to throw away
apparently-unused data is __attribute__((used)), like this:
static const char __attribute__((used)) rcs_sccs_id[] =
$Id: @(#)%M%
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:23:38PM +0200, Raz wrote:
http://sos-linux.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/sos-linux/LinuxHebrew/gitcourse/
To those who are too lazy to read git-pro in english, I have translated
git-pro important parts
to hebrew.
1. Great!
2. But why that choice of version control?
18 matches
Mail list logo
