áéåí øàùåï, 6 áàå÷èåáø 2002, 19:38, Dvir Volk ëúá:
> I highly doubt it's legal. I've looked in fraunhofer's site, which
> refered me to an mp3 licensing site, that said:
>
From that Q&A it seems to me that developers are required to get a license,
but not users - you are expected to use a licen
On Friday 04 October 2002 19:10, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2002, voguemaster wrote about "Re: xmms rh8":
> > Honestly I don't quite get it.
> > How can they break such a behaviour or supported feature of the system ??
> >
> > RH at previous versions could play mp3 easily, now you can't
I use windows-1255 on http://portal.jce.ac.il
take a look at the source code of the resulting html, you need to hack
the header.php file, if i remember to add the meta tag.
On Sun, 2002-10-06 at 22:45, Arie Folger wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > Did anybody attempt to force nukephp, postnuke or php
hi,
Did anybody attempt to force nukephp, postnuke or phpwebsite to use utf8
everywere instead of iso-8859-1? I am no php cognoscenti (although it does
look very much like a cross between perl and html), so I am likely to
overlook some calls that automatically generate a default charset.
Does
for all those job seekers, checkout www.jobnet.co.il
there is a lot of linux requests.
--
QOTD:
"I tried buying a goat instead of a lawn tractor; had to return
it though. Couldn't figure out a way to connect the snow blower."
===
Aviram Jenik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just to be historically correct, it was decided about 2 years ago that
> job _offers_ that are related to Linux are acceptable.
My recollection is different, but I may be mistaken and the archives
don't go back even two years. In any case, links to resu
>
> IIRC, it has been decided long ago (longer than the archives are kept,
> I guess, though I have not checked) that postings regarding (linux)
> jobs - both ways - were acceptable on the list.
Just to be historically correct, it was decided about 2 years ago that
job _offers_ that are related
I highly doubt it's legal. I've looked in fraunhofer's site, which
refered me to an mp3 licensing site, that said:
"Do you license mp3/mp3PRO software to end users?
No. We license mp3/mp3PRO software and patents to developers and
manufacturers of software applications and hardware devices.
Many
I ___Think its
legal for u, not legal for them. why should you care.
you cannot be held liable for using something that is buried under a
million lines of code, and no warning, or cease and desist kind of
message for every user that "in good conscience" d/led a plugin.
But IANAL.
* - * - *
Tz
04/10/02 14:11:16, Oleg Kobets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Besides, you can easily d/l the missing rpm from xmms website.
>
>Oleg.
And is THAT legal ?? Those libraries use a technology which is
patented, how is that allowed ???
Eli
"There's so many different worlds
So many different suns
04/10/02 15:58:09, Amir Tal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Friday 04 October 2002 11:28 am, voguemaster wrote:
>> Honestly I don't quite get it.
>> How can they break such a behaviour or supported feature of the system ??
>>
>> RH at previous versions could play mp3 easily, now you can't use XMMS
04/10/02 13:39:57, Mark Veltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>What is so strange ? MP3 is a COPYRIGHTED format. A german research
>institution holds the copy right and has started to sue companies who
>distribute mp3 players without paying them royalties (since they can't sue
>the users themselv
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> In addition, I would also like to know what is going on because it
> seems that many people are loosing their job lately. I consider this
> information on topic as well.
Ah, well, there are several reasons:
The quarter has just ended, and with it, dire financial res
are we living in the same country as the reporter who wrote this ??
http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-2160334,00.html
and i thought things were bad... ;) (i know they are for me)
tal.
To unsubscribe, send
mail to [EMAIL PR
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
>
> Yaacov Fenster - System Engineering Troubleshooting and other miracles
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > c) A certain company just decided to get rid of this person.
>
> This piece of information was not in the OP. But thanks for the
It was.
As an indirect-indirect
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 03:24:11PM +0300, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> > own personal job-searching agenda PLEASE at least give a URL with their
> > resume?
>
> Since nobody posted here their "job-searching agenda" without a CV URL,
> why do you even bother complaining about this non-issue?
Actually,
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 04:33:15PM +0300, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 03:24:11PM +0300, Nadav Har'El wrote:
>
> > > own personal job-searching agenda PLEASE at least give a URL with their
> > > resume?
> >
> > Since nobody posted here their "job-searching agenda" without a
Yaacov Fenster - System Engineering Troubleshooting and other miracles
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> c) A certain company just decided to get rid of this person.
This piece of information was not in the OP. But thanks for the
"respected" part - I was hoping someone would think so... ;-)
Peopl
Guy Cohen wrote:
>
> Well since every one dont give a f*ck about the list and
> thinks it's their mothers, i want too.
The original posting was short, to the point and on topic. It told me
(and anyone who bothered to read it) that
a) A respected member of this list is looking for a job.
b) A po
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> In addition, I would also like to know what is going on because it
> seems that many people are loosing their job lately.
Or quit. The latest several job-seeking leeches have not discussed the
reasons.
--
Oleg Goldshmidt | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
Nadav Har'El wrote:
>On Sun, Oct 06, 2002, Shachar Shemesh wrote about "Re: job wanted also - NOT - YES!":
>
>
>>Will the people on this list who want to shamelessly leach it for their
>>
>>
>
>Again, I don't think the phrase "shamelessly leach" is appropriate here.
>
http://www.m-w.com/
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Guy Cohen wrote:
> an alternative would be to open linux-il-jobs.
> consider doing this because self propaganda is not in place for
> this list.
There is il.jobs.resumes , IIRC. It contains mostly spam, though.
--
Tzafrir Cohen
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.technion.a
Guy Cohen wrote:
I don't see how. consider having 200 people fired from
"whateverbigcompany" in a day, now since most of them are linux/unix
professionals they are surly subscribe to linux-il. what if 30% of them
decide to post a short message to the list saying they want a job?
you'll have 50-70
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Guy Cohen wrote:
> I don't see how. consider having 200 people fired from "whateverbigcompany"
> in a day, now since most of them are linux/unix professionals they are surly
> subscribe to linux-il. what if 30% of them decide to post a short message
> to the list saying they
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002, Shachar Shemesh wrote about "Re: job wanted also - NOT - YES!":
> Will the people on this list who want to shamelessly leach it for their
Again, I don't think the phrase "shamelessly leach" is appropriate here.
It was decided that such postings were acceptable. Moreover, as
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 02:19:37PM +0300, Guy Cohen wrote:
> Well since every one dont give a f*ck about the list and
> thinks it's their mothers, i want too.
>
> HEY... IM LOOKING FOR A JOB CAN YOU HALP ME
> I DONT CARE IF THATS OFFTOPIC/INAPPROPRIATE/RUDE/WTF I DONT CARE!!
>
> I WANT A JO
You know what, I think making a living is a bit more important then some
virtual courtesy, and if a small community can help its members then that's
exactly what it should do, otherwise what's the use of having one. Basic
Socialism. what's exactly bugging you there? seems like narrow mindless to
m
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 11:58:52AM -, Moshe Zadka wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Guy Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > And the worst thing is that im the only one who flame them.
>
> Maybe there's a good reason for you being the only one who flames
> them.
yes. im shameless.
===
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 02:47:26PM +0300, Orna Agmon wrote:
>
> I think job offers and job-wanted offers are very much on topic in
> linux-il, if they are linux related.
I don't see how. consider having 200 people fired from "whateverbigcompany"
in a day, now since most of them are linux/unix p
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Guy Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And the worst thing is that im the only one who flame them.
Maybe there's a good reason for you being the only one who flames
them.
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PR
Guy Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well since every one dont give a f*ck about the list and
> thinks it's their mothers, i want too.
>
> HEY... IM LOOKING FOR A JOB CAN YOU HALP ME
> I DONT CARE IF THATS OFFTOPIC/INAPPROPRIATE/RUDE/WTF I DONT CARE!!
>
> I WANT A JOB!
>
> will you hir
Will the people on this list who want to shamelessly leach it for their
own personal job-searching agenda PLEASE at least give a URL with their
resume? I don't think that, given the times, I want to flame the job
seekers, but there is really nothing to show my HR department unless you
also giv
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002, Guy Cohen wrote about "job wanted also - NOT - YES!":
[vulgar language removed]
> And the worst thing is that im the only one who flame them.
Hmm, maybe it's because there was a discussion about that in the past, and
it was decided that both job-offers and job-requests were
I think job offers and job-wanted offers are very much on topic in
linux-il, if they are linux related.
As a person who is constantly looking for good profesional to recommend
for hiring, I find it most useful to have job offers and job-wanted
offers published here.
I am not into flaming us
Some time ago, Shlomi Fish raised some stench about the BitKeeper license.
Now it seems that there is a big new controversy about it. See Slashdot or
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2002/debian-devel-announce-200210/msg2.html
McVoy does not want to grant free BitKeeper license
I believe that you're referring to the links. In this case - ftp.tux.org
and ftp.stealth.net are very good ones (once they are not fulfilled :).
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Amir Tal wrote:
> so I've decided to give MDK 9 a try. ;)
>
> can anyone recommend a good and fast one ? everything in the default
Well since every one dont give a f*ck about the list and
thinks it's their mothers, i want too.
HEY... IM LOOKING FOR A JOB CAN YOU HALP ME
I DONT CARE IF THATS OFFTOPIC/INAPPROPRIATE/RUDE/WTF I DONT CARE!!
I WANT A JOB!
will you hire me?
And the worst thing is that im the only one who fl
Hi everybody,
For reasons that shall remain off-topic for this list (this seems to
be a good tradition nowadays), I am in the market for a new job. My
preferences, inclinations, et caetera can be found at
http://www.goldshmidt.org/cv/
together with the "official" one-page CV in a variety of po
I'm currently D/L it from IGLU at 150K/s
Shachar
Amir Tal wrote:
>so I've decided to give MDK 9 a try. ;)
>
>can anyone recommend a good and fast one ? everything in the default list is
>either very slow or dead.
>
>tal.
>
>
>===
so I've decided to give MDK 9 a try. ;)
can anyone recommend a good and fast one ? everything in the default list is
either very slow or dead.
tal.
To unsubscribe, send
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in th
I wonder if anybody tried to compile OpenSSH on PPC platform (or with any
cross-compiler at all).
Here is what I'm trying to do:
export CFLAGS=""
export LDFLAGS=""
export CPPFLAGS=""
export CC=ppc_8xx-gcc
export LD=ppc_8xx-nm
export LD=ppc_8xx-ld
export AR=ppc_8xx-ar
export RANLIB=ppc_8xx-ranli
41 matches
Mail list logo
