On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:09 AM, Aviad Mandel aviad.man...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Oleg Goldshmidt p...@goldshmidt.org wrote:
Someone gave you, i.e., conveyed, distributed, that object code
whose only purpose is to create the browser when linked to some GPLed
code.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Oleg Goldshmidt p...@goldshmidt.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:09 AM, Aviad Mandel aviad.man...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Oleg Goldshmidt p...@goldshmidt.org wrote:
Someone gave you, i.e., conveyed, distributed, that object code
Hi,
[Posting this for a friend. If interested, please send me your CV and I'll
forward it.]
A company in the Herzeliya area is looking for a person to take charge of their
configuration management needs. This is a full-time position. Requirements as
follows:
- At least 2-3 year as team
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Oleg Goldshmidt p...@goldshmidt.orgwrote:
I hope it resolves your confusion.
Unfortunately not. I am familiar with the relevant parts, and I agree that
if you read them over and over again, you get kinda convinced that mixing
GPL code with closed-source
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011, Aviad Mandel wrote about A little GPL riddle (was: GPL
as an evaluation license):
And please, I know that the mixed binary is derived work and must be
distributed further under the same license. But the thing is that nobody
The key error here is the word must. It's
Hello all,
RMS will speak at the Haifa University on July 21st, hosted by Prof. Sheizaf
Refaeli.
For further details see the facebook page:
http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=189925137718662
--
Orna Agmon Ben-Yehuda.
http://ladypine.org
___
Linux-il
