Re: portable encypted filesystem

[Efraim Flashner]

git-annex? I know there's a Windows port but I've never set it up, and I've 
used it before successfully on android. Everything is encrypted on the backends 
using gpg and setup is pretty easy.

On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 12:51:36 +0200
Erez D  wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Rabin Yasharzadehe  wrote:
> 
> > TrueCrypt ?
> >
> just reading about it ;-)
> however it is unmaintained (should i use veracrypt ? no audit done on it,)
> and i do not need all this functionality

I believe truecrypt has some CVEs filed against it this year.

> 
> what i liked about ecryptfs is that it is the default ubuntu encryption
> (which raise my trust in it), and that it encrypts file by file rather than
> volume (which better fits to running it over dropbox or gdrive)
> 
> >
> > --
> > Rabin
> >
> > On 17 November 2015 at 11:27, Erez D  wrote:
> >
> >> Hello
> >>
> >> It is very nice to hold some data on the cloud accessible from everywhere
> >> however if i do not want the cloud to have access to it, it requires
> >> encryption
> >>
> >> i could mount gdrive, dropbox or other cloud fs localy
> >> and mount ecryptfs on it so i have transparent encryption
> >>
> >> my only problem is that it works on linux only
> >>
> >> does anyone knows a way of having a portable transparent encryption
> >> which will support linux, and windows ?
> >> (would be nice if it will also support android (even if  i can not
> >> insmod) and ios)
> >>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> Linux-il mailing list
> >> Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
> >> http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
> >>


pgpxty18BhUFy.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il

Re: persistent private browsing ?

[Rabin Yasharzadehe]

In my case for each new Chrome session I install `ublock origin` , which
allow you to backup your setting to a file.
but you may find where the plugin save it configuration and re-apply them
after chrome start.

I also now about `proxy switchysharp` which allow you to export it
configurations.



--
Rabin

On 17 November 2015 at 12:52, Erez D  wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Rabin Yasharzadehe 
> wrote:
>
>> That's right, Incognito/Privet Browsing mode share the same session.
>> this is why you need to create a new profile for each case.
>>
>> Chrome & Firefox can be configure to run with pre-installed addons,
>> but you may need to configure them if needed.
>> but there some extension which allow you to export there settings (so
>> maybe you can automate the import ?).
>>
> do you know which ?
>
>>
>> --
>> Rabin
>>
>> On 17 November 2015 at 11:19, Erez D  wrote:
>>
>>> you are correct
>>>
>>> however, it is  needed to re-configire each and every profile - plugins,
>>> master password etc
>>>
>>> would be nice to have different profiles with some common settings, on
>>> different tabs on same window ...
>>>
>>> btw, i found that even 'private browsing' is not so private as if you
>>> open multiple tabs or windows of private browsing, they all share the same
>>> cookies.
>>> the only thing different about private browsing is that the cookies are
>>> deleted when all the private browsing sessions end.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 5:53 PM, E.S. Rosenberg  wrote:
>>>
 If I'm not mistaken you should be able to accomplish this by starting
 Firefox with a different profile (firefox -P or firefox --profile)

 2015-11-15 10:36 GMT+02:00 Efraim Flashner :
 > I'm using privacy badger to block the following aspects of the
 different ads, including facebook. Doesn't sandbox them, but does keep them
 all from following me around the web.  I'm also using privoxy with tor to
 pass my browser traffic through tor, but that's not really going to make a
 difference in relation to your question.
 >
 >
 > On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:26:18 +0200
 > Rabin Yasharzadehe  wrote:
 >
 >> I'm using chrome and launch it with a new DATADIR each time. (see
 here
 >> <
 http://blog.rabin.io/linux/start-chrome-temp-profile-with-preinstalled-extension
 >
 >> )
 >> useful for sites which need flash.
 >>
 >> I was having problems downloading the CRX files so now i just point
 them
 >> directly in the config file
 >> and each new Chrome run will download them.
 >>
 >> --
 >> Rabin
 >>
 >> On 15 November 2015 at 10:18, Erez D  wrote:
 >>
 >> > Hello
 >> >
 >> > Today browsers support Private Browsing mode (e.g. sandbox) .
 however,
 >> > when i close that window, all it's data is lost, next time i will
 again
 >> > need to supply my login, password, etc
 >> >
 >> > What i want, is a way to sandbox a site (e.g. facebook), and
 reopen it
 >> > tomorrow in the same sandbox. i.e. when i am going to a web page
 not from
 >> > that sandbox, if that web page includes pages from facebook, it
 will not be
 >> > able to track my facebook identity as i login to facebook only
 from the
 >> > sandbox.
 >> >
 >> > the only way i can do it right now is by accessing facebook from a
 >> > different browser than the rest of the pages.
 >> >
 >> > however there are many websites (facebook, google twiter etc.) and
 i do
 >> > not have so many browsers
 >> >
 >> > is there a way to open a private browsing page, and be able to
 access it
 >> > again after reopening the browser ?
 >> >
 >
 > --
 > Efraim Flashner      אפרים פלשנר
 > GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
 > Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received
 unencrypted
 >
 > ___
 > Linux-il mailing list
 > Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
 > http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
 >

>>>
>>>
>>
>
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il

Re: persistent private browsing ?

[Erez D]

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Rabin Yasharzadehe  wrote:

> That's right, Incognito/Privet Browsing mode share the same session.
> this is why you need to create a new profile for each case.
>
> Chrome & Firefox can be configure to run with pre-installed addons,
> but you may need to configure them if needed.
> but there some extension which allow you to export there settings (so
> maybe you can automate the import ?).
>
do you know which ?

>
> --
> Rabin
>
> On 17 November 2015 at 11:19, Erez D  wrote:
>
>> you are correct
>>
>> however, it is  needed to re-configire each and every profile - plugins,
>> master password etc
>>
>> would be nice to have different profiles with some common settings, on
>> different tabs on same window ...
>>
>> btw, i found that even 'private browsing' is not so private as if you
>> open multiple tabs or windows of private browsing, they all share the same
>> cookies.
>> the only thing different about private browsing is that the cookies are
>> deleted when all the private browsing sessions end.
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 5:53 PM, E.S. Rosenberg  wrote:
>>
>>> If I'm not mistaken you should be able to accomplish this by starting
>>> Firefox with a different profile (firefox -P or firefox --profile)
>>>
>>> 2015-11-15 10:36 GMT+02:00 Efraim Flashner :
>>> > I'm using privacy badger to block the following aspects of the
>>> different ads, including facebook. Doesn't sandbox them, but does keep them
>>> all from following me around the web.  I'm also using privoxy with tor to
>>> pass my browser traffic through tor, but that's not really going to make a
>>> difference in relation to your question.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:26:18 +0200
>>> > Rabin Yasharzadehe  wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> I'm using chrome and launch it with a new DATADIR each time. (see here
>>> >> <
>>> http://blog.rabin.io/linux/start-chrome-temp-profile-with-preinstalled-extension
>>> >
>>> >> )
>>> >> useful for sites which need flash.
>>> >>
>>> >> I was having problems downloading the CRX files so now i just point
>>> them
>>> >> directly in the config file
>>> >> and each new Chrome run will download them.
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Rabin
>>> >>
>>> >> On 15 November 2015 at 10:18, Erez D  wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > Hello
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Today browsers support Private Browsing mode (e.g. sandbox) .
>>> however,
>>> >> > when i close that window, all it's data is lost, next time i will
>>> again
>>> >> > need to supply my login, password, etc
>>> >> >
>>> >> > What i want, is a way to sandbox a site (e.g. facebook), and reopen
>>> it
>>> >> > tomorrow in the same sandbox. i.e. when i am going to a web page
>>> not from
>>> >> > that sandbox, if that web page includes pages from facebook, it
>>> will not be
>>> >> > able to track my facebook identity as i login to facebook only from
>>> the
>>> >> > sandbox.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > the only way i can do it right now is by accessing facebook from a
>>> >> > different browser than the rest of the pages.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > however there are many websites (facebook, google twiter etc.) and
>>> i do
>>> >> > not have so many browsers
>>> >> >
>>> >> > is there a way to open a private browsing page, and be able to
>>> access it
>>> >> > again after reopening the browser ?
>>> >> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Efraim Flashner      אפרים פלשנר
>>> > GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
>>> > Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received
>>> unencrypted
>>> >
>>> > ___
>>> > Linux-il mailing list
>>> > Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
>>> > http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il

Re: portable encypted filesystem

[Rabin Yasharzadehe]

VeraCrypt is fork which continue the TrueCrypt legacy,
TrueCrypt had some audit (crowd source founded) on the encryption part
(algorithm and stuff), the boot loader,  and the windows kernel driver
(IIRC).

they found few  vulnerabilities at first (3 I think), but nothing critical,
and they were patched in VeraCrypt.

next was a bug in the windows driver which allowed a user/process to gain
SYSTEM privileges.
which also was patched.





--
Rabin

On 17 November 2015 at 12:51, Erez D  wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Rabin Yasharzadehe 
> wrote:
>
>> TrueCrypt ?
>>
> just reading about it ;-)
> however it is unmaintained (should i use veracrypt ? no audit done on it,)
> and i do not need all this functionality
>
> what i liked about ecryptfs is that it is the default ubuntu encryption
> (which raise my trust in it), and that it encrypts file by file rather than
> volume (which better fits to running it over dropbox or gdrive)
>
>>
>> --
>> Rabin
>>
>> On 17 November 2015 at 11:27, Erez D  wrote:
>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> It is very nice to hold some data on the cloud accessible from everywhere
>>> however if i do not want the cloud to have access to it, it requires
>>> encryption
>>>
>>> i could mount gdrive, dropbox or other cloud fs localy
>>> and mount ecryptfs on it so i have transparent encryption
>>>
>>> my only problem is that it works on linux only
>>>
>>> does anyone knows a way of having a portable transparent encryption
>>> which will support linux, and windows ?
>>> (would be nice if it will also support android (even if  i can not
>>> insmod) and ios)
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Linux-il mailing list
>>> Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
>>> http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
>>>
>>>
>>
>
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il

Re: portable encypted filesystem

[Rabin Yasharzadehe]

TrueCrypt ?

--
Rabin

On 17 November 2015 at 11:27, Erez D  wrote:

> Hello
>
> It is very nice to hold some data on the cloud accessible from everywhere
> however if i do not want the cloud to have access to it, it requires
> encryption
>
> i could mount gdrive, dropbox or other cloud fs localy
> and mount ecryptfs on it so i have transparent encryption
>
> my only problem is that it works on linux only
>
> does anyone knows a way of having a portable transparent encryption
> which will support linux, and windows ?
> (would be nice if it will also support android (even if  i can not insmod)
> and ios)
>
>
> ___
> Linux-il mailing list
> Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
> http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
>
>
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il

Re: portable encypted filesystem

[Erez D]

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Rabin Yasharzadehe  wrote:

> TrueCrypt ?
>
just reading about it ;-)
however it is unmaintained (should i use veracrypt ? no audit done on it,)
and i do not need all this functionality

what i liked about ecryptfs is that it is the default ubuntu encryption
(which raise my trust in it), and that it encrypts file by file rather than
volume (which better fits to running it over dropbox or gdrive)

>
> --
> Rabin
>
> On 17 November 2015 at 11:27, Erez D  wrote:
>
>> Hello
>>
>> It is very nice to hold some data on the cloud accessible from everywhere
>> however if i do not want the cloud to have access to it, it requires
>> encryption
>>
>> i could mount gdrive, dropbox or other cloud fs localy
>> and mount ecryptfs on it so i have transparent encryption
>>
>> my only problem is that it works on linux only
>>
>> does anyone knows a way of having a portable transparent encryption
>> which will support linux, and windows ?
>> (would be nice if it will also support android (even if  i can not
>> insmod) and ios)
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Linux-il mailing list
>> Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
>> http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
>>
>>
>
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il

Re: portable encypted filesystem

[ronys]

https://www.boxcryptor.com

Note that they have a freemium business model. The free version should be
good enough for simple stuff.

On יום ג׳, 17 בנוב׳ 2015 at 11:27 Erez D  wrote:

> Hello
>
> It is very nice to hold some data on the cloud accessible from everywhere
> however if i do not want the cloud to have access to it, it requires
> encryption
>
> i could mount gdrive, dropbox or other cloud fs localy
> and mount ecryptfs on it so i have transparent encryption
>
> my only problem is that it works on linux only
>
> does anyone knows a way of having a portable transparent encryption
> which will support linux, and windows ?
> (would be nice if it will also support android (even if  i can not insmod)
> and ios)
>
> ___
> Linux-il mailing list
> Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
> http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
>
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il

Re: persistent private browsing ?

[Erez D]

you are correct

however, it is  needed to re-configire each and every profile - plugins,
master password etc

would be nice to have different profiles with some common settings, on
different tabs on same window ...

btw, i found that even 'private browsing' is not so private as if you open
multiple tabs or windows of private browsing, they all share the same
cookies.
the only thing different about private browsing is that the cookies are
deleted when all the private browsing sessions end.

On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 5:53 PM, E.S. Rosenberg  wrote:

> If I'm not mistaken you should be able to accomplish this by starting
> Firefox with a different profile (firefox -P or firefox --profile)
>
> 2015-11-15 10:36 GMT+02:00 Efraim Flashner :
> > I'm using privacy badger to block the following aspects of the different
> ads, including facebook. Doesn't sandbox them, but does keep them all from
> following me around the web.  I'm also using privoxy with tor to pass my
> browser traffic through tor, but that's not really going to make a
> difference in relation to your question.
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:26:18 +0200
> > Rabin Yasharzadehe  wrote:
> >
> >> I'm using chrome and launch it with a new DATADIR each time. (see here
> >> <
> http://blog.rabin.io/linux/start-chrome-temp-profile-with-preinstalled-extension
> >
> >> )
> >> useful for sites which need flash.
> >>
> >> I was having problems downloading the CRX files so now i just point them
> >> directly in the config file
> >> and each new Chrome run will download them.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Rabin
> >>
> >> On 15 November 2015 at 10:18, Erez D  wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hello
> >> >
> >> > Today browsers support Private Browsing mode (e.g. sandbox) . however,
> >> > when i close that window, all it's data is lost, next time i will
> again
> >> > need to supply my login, password, etc
> >> >
> >> > What i want, is a way to sandbox a site (e.g. facebook), and reopen it
> >> > tomorrow in the same sandbox. i.e. when i am going to a web page not
> from
> >> > that sandbox, if that web page includes pages from facebook, it will
> not be
> >> > able to track my facebook identity as i login to facebook only from
> the
> >> > sandbox.
> >> >
> >> > the only way i can do it right now is by accessing facebook from a
> >> > different browser than the rest of the pages.
> >> >
> >> > however there are many websites (facebook, google twiter etc.) and i
> do
> >> > not have so many browsers
> >> >
> >> > is there a way to open a private browsing page, and be able to access
> it
> >> > again after reopening the browser ?
> >> >
> >
> > --
> > Efraim Flashner      אפרים פלשנר
> > GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
> > Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received
> unencrypted
> >
> > ___
> > Linux-il mailing list
> > Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
> > http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
> >
>
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il

portable encypted filesystem

[Erez D]

Hello

It is very nice to hold some data on the cloud accessible from everywhere
however if i do not want the cloud to have access to it, it requires
encryption

i could mount gdrive, dropbox or other cloud fs localy
and mount ecryptfs on it so i have transparent encryption

my only problem is that it works on linux only

does anyone knows a way of having a portable transparent encryption
which will support linux, and windows ?
(would be nice if it will also support android (even if  i can not insmod)
and ios)
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il

Any Chrome extension developers around here?

[Amos Shapira]

Hi,

I have a itch with Chrome I'd like to scratch but don't have time to learn
how to program a Chrome extension.

Does anyone here know how to program Chrome extensions and is interested in
a small project?

It's about controlling which of multiple parallel logged in Chrome users
(think - workplace Google Apps login in paralel to a personal Google login)
will be used when opening a link from another app (in my case - on OSX)
based on URL matching.

Thanks.

-- 

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il

Re: persistent private browsing ?

[Rabin Yasharzadehe]

That's right, Incognito/Privet Browsing mode share the same session.
this is why you need to create a new profile for each case.

Chrome & Firefox can be configure to run with pre-installed addons,
but you may need to configure them if needed.
but there some extension which allow you to export there settings (so maybe
you can automate the import ?).

--
Rabin

On 17 November 2015 at 11:19, Erez D  wrote:

> you are correct
>
> however, it is  needed to re-configire each and every profile - plugins,
> master password etc
>
> would be nice to have different profiles with some common settings, on
> different tabs on same window ...
>
> btw, i found that even 'private browsing' is not so private as if you open
> multiple tabs or windows of private browsing, they all share the same
> cookies.
> the only thing different about private browsing is that the cookies are
> deleted when all the private browsing sessions end.
>
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 5:53 PM, E.S. Rosenberg  wrote:
>
>> If I'm not mistaken you should be able to accomplish this by starting
>> Firefox with a different profile (firefox -P or firefox --profile)
>>
>> 2015-11-15 10:36 GMT+02:00 Efraim Flashner :
>> > I'm using privacy badger to block the following aspects of the
>> different ads, including facebook. Doesn't sandbox them, but does keep them
>> all from following me around the web.  I'm also using privoxy with tor to
>> pass my browser traffic through tor, but that's not really going to make a
>> difference in relation to your question.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:26:18 +0200
>> > Rabin Yasharzadehe  wrote:
>> >
>> >> I'm using chrome and launch it with a new DATADIR each time. (see here
>> >> <
>> http://blog.rabin.io/linux/start-chrome-temp-profile-with-preinstalled-extension
>> >
>> >> )
>> >> useful for sites which need flash.
>> >>
>> >> I was having problems downloading the CRX files so now i just point
>> them
>> >> directly in the config file
>> >> and each new Chrome run will download them.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Rabin
>> >>
>> >> On 15 November 2015 at 10:18, Erez D  wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Hello
>> >> >
>> >> > Today browsers support Private Browsing mode (e.g. sandbox) .
>> however,
>> >> > when i close that window, all it's data is lost, next time i will
>> again
>> >> > need to supply my login, password, etc
>> >> >
>> >> > What i want, is a way to sandbox a site (e.g. facebook), and reopen
>> it
>> >> > tomorrow in the same sandbox. i.e. when i am going to a web page not
>> from
>> >> > that sandbox, if that web page includes pages from facebook, it will
>> not be
>> >> > able to track my facebook identity as i login to facebook only from
>> the
>> >> > sandbox.
>> >> >
>> >> > the only way i can do it right now is by accessing facebook from a
>> >> > different browser than the rest of the pages.
>> >> >
>> >> > however there are many websites (facebook, google twiter etc.) and i
>> do
>> >> > not have so many browsers
>> >> >
>> >> > is there a way to open a private browsing page, and be able to
>> access it
>> >> > again after reopening the browser ?
>> >> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Efraim Flashner      אפרים פלשנר
>> > GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
>> > Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received
>> unencrypted
>> >
>> > ___
>> > Linux-il mailing list
>> > Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
>> > http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
>> >
>>
>
>
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il

Re: persistent private browsing ?

[E.S. Rosenberg]

BTW The plugins/addons/language preferences you use and advertise to
the website actually help identify you too... depending on how
standard or non-standard your settings are just your browser agent and
http headers may be enough of a fingerprint

2015-11-17 14:19 GMT+02:00 Rabin Yasharzadehe :
> In my case for each new Chrome session I install `ublock origin` , which
> allow you to backup your setting to a file.
> but you may find where the plugin save it configuration and re-apply them
> after chrome start.
>
> I also now about `proxy switchysharp` which allow you to export it
> configurations.
>
>
>
> --
> Rabin
>
> On 17 November 2015 at 12:52, Erez D  wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Rabin Yasharzadehe 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> That's right, Incognito/Privet Browsing mode share the same session.
>>> this is why you need to create a new profile for each case.
>>>
>>> Chrome & Firefox can be configure to run with pre-installed addons,
>>> but you may need to configure them if needed.
>>> but there some extension which allow you to export there settings (so
>>> maybe you can automate the import ?).
>>
>> do you know which ?
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Rabin
>>>
>>> On 17 November 2015 at 11:19, Erez D  wrote:

 you are correct

 however, it is  needed to re-configire each and every profile - plugins,
 master password etc

 would be nice to have different profiles with some common settings, on
 different tabs on same window ...

 btw, i found that even 'private browsing' is not so private as if you
 open multiple tabs or windows of private browsing, they all share the same
 cookies.
 the only thing different about private browsing is that the cookies are
 deleted when all the private browsing sessions end.

 On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 5:53 PM, E.S. Rosenberg  wrote:
>
> If I'm not mistaken you should be able to accomplish this by starting
> Firefox with a different profile (firefox -P or firefox --profile)
>
> 2015-11-15 10:36 GMT+02:00 Efraim Flashner :
> > I'm using privacy badger to block the following aspects of the
> > different ads, including facebook. Doesn't sandbox them, but does keep 
> > them
> > all from following me around the web.  I'm also using privoxy with tor 
> > to
> > pass my browser traffic through tor, but that's not really going to 
> > make a
> > difference in relation to your question.
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:26:18 +0200
> > Rabin Yasharzadehe  wrote:
> >
> >> I'm using chrome and launch it with a new DATADIR each time. (see
> >> here
> >>
> >> 
> >> )
> >> useful for sites which need flash.
> >>
> >> I was having problems downloading the CRX files so now i just point
> >> them
> >> directly in the config file
> >> and each new Chrome run will download them.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Rabin
> >>
> >> On 15 November 2015 at 10:18, Erez D  wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hello
> >> >
> >> > Today browsers support Private Browsing mode (e.g. sandbox) .
> >> > however,
> >> > when i close that window, all it's data is lost, next time i will
> >> > again
> >> > need to supply my login, password, etc
> >> >
> >> > What i want, is a way to sandbox a site (e.g. facebook), and
> >> > reopen it
> >> > tomorrow in the same sandbox. i.e. when i am going to a web page
> >> > not from
> >> > that sandbox, if that web page includes pages from facebook, it
> >> > will not be
> >> > able to track my facebook identity as i login to facebook only
> >> > from the
> >> > sandbox.
> >> >
> >> > the only way i can do it right now is by accessing facebook from a
> >> > different browser than the rest of the pages.
> >> >
> >> > however there are many websites (facebook, google twiter etc.) and
> >> > i do
> >> > not have so many browsers
> >> >
> >> > is there a way to open a private browsing page, and be able to
> >> > access it
> >> > again after reopening the browser ?
> >> >
> >
> > --
> > Efraim Flashner      אפרים פלשנר
> > GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
> > Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received
> > unencrypted
> >
> > ___
> > Linux-il mailing list
> > Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
> > http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
> >


>>>
>>
>

___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il