Not so fast...
On Sun, 8 Feb 2009 21:18:13 -0800, Aviram Jenik avi...@jenik.com wrote:
Tal Kaplan, from pczlaw, was kind enough to give me a detailed
explanation(*)
about this matter.
First, to answer both Dotan and Boaz, it should be a relatively simple
process
to get 1,000 NIS for
Omer Zak wrote:
From the contents of a relatively unfiltered mailbox (which fortunately
is not widely advertised and I check it only once each few weeks),
Leiberman indeed uses very much the political exemption.
I got in that mailbox a lot of spam from:
* Israel Beitanu (Leiberman's party) -
b...@rymland.com wrote:
You may want to start with this:
http://www.moital.gov.il/NR/exeres/1A0A7AB5-68D4-4739-801D-44390FEE7A39.htm
That's exactly the reason why I haven't done it myself as well. The
necessity to appear in court
which means taking a day off or something.
A few
b...@rymland.com wrote:
That's exactly the reason why I haven't done it myself as well. The
necessity to appear in court
which means taking a day off or something.
You can add that cost to the claim.
A few complimentary questions:
1) Have anyone heard of successful small claims suits so
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
Well, I find that hard to believe. You will eventually have to prove
that you received the SPAM from them. and that you did not alter it in
any way.
The law is very specific that having your name appearing on the spam as
the one being advertised is sufficient
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 11:24:34AM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
The law is very specific that having your name appearing on the spam as
the one being advertised is sufficient evidence that you are the
presumed spammer. I imagine that, should the spammer want to claim they
are not, the burden
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 11:24:34AM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
The law is very specific that having your name appearing on the spam
as the one being advertised is sufficient evidence that you are the
presumed spammer. I imagine that, should the spammer want to
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009, Shachar Shemesh wrote about Re: OFFTOPIC: Re: Hebrew
spam: what to do about it?:
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
Well, I find that hard to believe. You will eventually have to prove
that you received the SPAM from them. and that you did not alter it in
any way
Nadav Har'El wrote:
What do you do in such a case?
Sue.
The law specifically says that the person in charge of marketing must
make a personal effort to make sure that the company is spam free, or
face PERSONAL consequences.
In any case, like I said before, it's up to the spammer to prove
On Sunday 08 February 2009 23:42:54 b...@rymland.com wrote:
The only down side is that in small claims you have to file and appear
yourself, without a lawyer. This is basically the reason I haven't done
it
yet.
That's exactly the reason why I haven't done it myself as well. The
According to a couple of recent Hebrew spams that I got, there's a loophole
allowing ONE spam message per spammer per email address. They say that the
law allows sending one message if it is an offer for registration to a
publicity list (they can't send you more if you do not respond), so
Amit Aronovitch wrote:
According to a couple of recent Hebrew spams that I got, there's a
loophole allowing ONE spam message per spammer per email address. They
say that the law allows sending one message if it is an offer for
registration to a publicity list (they can't send you more if you
Quoting Aviram Jenik, from the post of Mon, 09 Feb:
On Sunday 08 February 2009 23:42:54 b...@rymland.com wrote:
The only down side is that in small claims you have to file and appear
yourself, without a lawyer. This is basically the reason I haven't done
Agreed. The only reason I wrote
From the contents of a relatively unfiltered mailbox (which fortunately
is not widely advertised and I check it only once each few weeks),
Leiberman indeed uses very much the political exemption.
I got in that mailbox a lot of spam from:
* Israel Beitanu (Leiberman's party) - sends tons of spam.
Similarly, due to time constraints I'm not currently performing any
active steps with the several spam emails that I have received lately,
all from some coaching/spiritual spammer.
If there's a lawyer or someone with enough spare time on his hands in
the crowd who wishes to raise the glove
Tal Kaplan, from pczlaw, was kind enough to give me a detailed explanation(*)
about this matter.
First, to answer both Dotan and Boaz, it should be a relatively simple process
to get 1,000 NIS for every incoming hebrew spam. Think about it as a gift
from a stranger. The process is documented
16 matches
Mail list logo
