No personal experience but iSCSI is a block level protocol so this should
depend on the filesystem you are running. Theoretically it is the same as
running any filesystem on a regular scsi device.
Yonah
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:42 PM, Amos Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25,
Hi,
For a LAN, AOE seems to have less overhead, so performance *might* be better
(assuming the network is the bottleneck).
iSCSI is much more popular in the industry, though.
My experience is with iSCSI - feel free to ask me if you need more info on
setting up iSCSI initiators targets.
ronys wrote:
Hi,
For a LAN, AOE seems to have less overhead, so performance *might* be better
(assuming the network is the bottleneck).
iSCSI is much more popular in the industry, though.
My experience is with iSCSI - feel free to ask me if you need more info on
setting up iSCSI initiators
The disadvantage of AOE is that it is Ethernet, Layer II, and not routable.
iSCSI is an IP protocol and so you can use it even over a WAN.
Although AOE sounds like a good idea, it is not very supported. Only one
company I've ever heard of makes commercial AOE devices. iSCSI on the other
hand is
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:26 AM, Yonah Russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The disadvantage of AOE is that it is Ethernet, Layer II, and not routable.
iSCSI is an IP protocol and so you can use it even over a WAN.
Although AOE sounds like a good idea, it is not very supported. Only one
company
