You Wrote:
Oh, I read that quotation when it was published. It is a simple
statistics-based interpretation, and not something fair to base
judgement on. These 8 vulnerabilities were not Mandrake's (but
shared for all the Linuxes), and most of them are not dangerous
for people with the
You Wrote:
Last thing: There is an Axiom that RH is better for servers while
Mandrake is better for clients. But from my humble opinion, I see
the opposite, at least with the latest versions (MD7.1 vs. RH6.2):
Mandrake supports features which are important for servers (e.g.
ReiserFS, Paranoid
Thank you all, Yosi, Tzafrir, Oleg, Ira, Chen, and Izar.
To say that now I'm less confused than before, will not be correct,
but I'll try to use your generous responses to make decisions.
Anyway, some notes:
"Mandrake also wins (hands down) the "easiest distribution to break
into remotely"
On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, Eli Marmor wrote:
In addition, it is not easy to patch existing kernels with the
secure-linux patches, because usually these kernels (especially RH
and Mandrake) already contain many other patches, and are already
I never recompile their sources anyway, I DL and compile
You wrote:
Thank you all, Yosi, Tzafrir, Oleg, Ira, Chen, and Izar.
You're welcome.
I wish I could use a distro ready with special security patches
(maybe KRUD?).
Ohhh, but you can. I did not include this in my previous reply because I
thought it is irrelevant to your question. There is
[Izar: Note the question at the bottom of the message]
Regarding GNOME vs. KDE: I didn't ask which is better; It's a
religious question, and involves personal taste, etc. I only asked
if one of them is more suitable to RH while another one is more
define "suitable" then? they are not
On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, Eli Marmor wrote:
Thank you all, Yosi, Tzafrir, Oleg, Ira, Chen, and Izar.
To say that now I'm less confused than before, will not be correct,
but I'll try to use your generous responses to make decisions.
Anyway, some notes:
"Mandrake also wins (hands down) the
Hi,
I think that I asked a similar question in the past, but didn't get
a clear answer:
Does the ResierFS version, *which is built in Mandrake-7.1*, support
NFS and can be exported to other machines on the LAN?
I don't ask if ReiserFS is great, or if it had problems in some of
its versions. I
On Sun, 2 Jul 2000, Eli Marmor wrote:
Does the ResierFS version, *which is built in Mandrake-7.1*, support
NFS and can be exported to other machines on the LAN?
as before, no one here has really tested for sure, you are welcome to
tell us how it works for you or join their devel list and see
On Sun, 2 Jul 2000, Eli Marmor wrote:
And in the same issue: In the past, Mandrake developed and invested
in the KDE integration more thanin GNOME, while RedHat did the
opposite. I heard that it is not true anymore (with Mandrake7.1 and
RH6.2). What do you recommend to use with 7.1, GNOME or
Eli Marmor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
which of them (GNOME/KDE) is recommended?
For me, mostly an issue of look and feel.
Last thing: There is an Axiom that RH is better for servers while
Mandrake is better for clients. But from my humble opinion, I see
the opposite, at least with the
11 matches
Mail list logo
