I'm not sure I agree with your claim about old Actcom's staff. I know most
of them (except one, I think) were not hired by Bezeq Int.
Really? They assured me that the staff stayed, and I have gotten
L-word help when I needed it. Netvision would not help me when I
couldn't tell the nice young
On Sunday 14 June 2009 14:34:50 Dotan Cohen wrote:
Use a header 301 redirect only! It moves pagerank to the new page.
Don't use javascript or meta redirects.
I used Redirect permanent. No luck there.
Yes, that's a 301. What do you mean by no luck?
It didn't help. Google eventually lost
Yes, that's a 301. What do you mean by no luck?
It didn't help. Google eventually lost the page rank for the old domain before
the redirect and I had to slowly regain it.
The only thing that you could have done here was to make sure that
there was a redirect long before the old domain went
On Monday 15 June 2009 13:11:44 Dotan Cohen wrote:
Yes, that's a 301. What do you mean by no luck?
It didn't help. Google eventually lost the page rank for the old domain
before the redirect and I had to slowly regain it.
The only thing that you could have done here was to make sure that
Up until recently I used to have smbfs mounts to all the development
and some of the production servers in my company. I used to mount as a
particular user in the host machine, and then every write, mode
change, time set etc. was done as that user on the server side, and
everything was
It didn't help. Google eventually lost the page rank for the old domain
before the redirect and I had to slowly regain it.
The only thing that you could have done here was to make sure that
there was a redirect long before the old domain went cold.
I did. But it didn't help. Did you mean
when i switched from smbfs to cifs - i added the 'domain=' parameter,
and used the name defined on the samba server - and had no similar
problems. did you try this?
also, i didn't use the file_mode, dir_mode or setuids optoins, that you
are using. i would try to remove them and see if
Dotan Cohen wrote:
I'm not sure I agree with your claim about old Actcom's staff. I know most
of them (except one, I think) were not hired by Bezeq Int.
Really? They assured me that the staff stayed, and I have gotten
L-word help when I needed it. Netvision would not help me when I
couldn't
She has a Linux laptop fully functional with Kbuntu 9.04. It is
connected via Ethernet to a cable modem. The cable modem is
working and the computer receives a cable IP .
She has a Netvision account and the connect script was tested with
a cable modem at my place and it worked. The
On 15/06/2009, at 23:31, guy keren wrote:
when i switched from smbfs to cifs - i added the 'domain='
parameter, and used the name defined on the samba server - and had
no similar problems. did you try this?
also, i didn't use the file_mode, dir_mode or setuids optoins, that
you are
Hi Oleg,
We tried to get a direct connection without a dialer, when we
opened the account for her.
Netvision although a few months after the merge with Barak, refused to give a
Barak account with no dialer.
I have a Barak account, no dialer, but they are not giving it any more ( the
last time
On Tuesday 16 June 2009, Gal Goldschmidt wrote:
Hi Oleg,
We tried to get a direct connection without a dialer, when we
opened the account for her.
Netvision although a few months after the merge with Barak, refused to
give a Barak account with no dialer.
I have a Barak account, no dialer,
12 matches
Mail list logo
