On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 07:26:36PM +0200, Elias Vanderstuyft wrote:
> Just like the EVIOCSABS(abs) macro, use the more compact
> _IOW(..., type) instead of _IOC(_IOC_WRITE, ..., sizeof(type))
> for the EVIOCSFF macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elias Vanderstuyft
Applied, thank
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Elias Vanderstuyft wrote:
> Just like the EVIOCSABS(abs) macro, use the more compact
> _IOW(..., type) instead of _IOC(_IOC_WRITE, ..., sizeof(type))
> for the EVIOCSFF macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elias Vanderstuyft
> ---
>
Just like the EVIOCSABS(abs) macro, use the more compact
_IOW(..., type) instead of _IOC(_IOC_WRITE, ..., sizeof(type))
for the EVIOCSFF macro.
Signed-off-by: Elias Vanderstuyft
---
include/uapi/linux/input.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
Hi everyone,
After inspecting the linux/input.h header file, I found that there
is one single ioctl value macro that is inconsistent w.r.t. the other
macros that do an IOC_WRITE :
EVIOCSFF _IOC(_IOC_WRITE, 'E', 0x80, sizeof(struct ff_effect))
Why not define it as follows? :
EVIOCSFF
Hi ELias,
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 08:14:13PM +0200, Elias Vanderstuyft wrote:
Hi everyone,
After inspecting the linux/input.h header file, I found that there
is one single ioctl value macro that is inconsistent w.r.t. the other
macros that do an IOC_WRITE :
EVIOCSFF _IOC(_IOC_WRITE,
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Elias,
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 08:14:13PM +0200, Elias Vanderstuyft wrote:
Hi everyone,
After inspecting the linux/input.h header file, I found that there
is one single ioctl value macro that is inconsistent
On Monday, September 08, 2014 09:03:11 PM Elias Vanderstuyft wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Elias,
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 08:14:13PM +0200, Elias Vanderstuyft wrote:
Hi everyone,
After inspecting the linux/input.h
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, September 08, 2014 09:03:11 PM Elias Vanderstuyft wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Elias,
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 08:14:13PM +0200, Elias