On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 09:41:55AM -0500, Mark Hahn wrote:
> > Since this looks like either a chipset, drive, or driver problem, I am
>
> no: the only entities involved with udma crc's are the drive,
> the controller (and the cable). the kernel is not involved in any way
> (except to configure
Lars Marowsky-Bree writes:
> This just goes on to show that khttpd is unnecessary kernel bloat
> and can be "just as well" handled by a userspace application, minus
> some rather very special cases which do not justify its inclusion
> into the main kernel.
My take on this is that khttpd is
Hi!
I'm the current maintainer of the VIA driver. I'm pretty sure the
version in 2.4.0 programs the chips correctly for harddrives at various
speeds, even leaving some margins where it shouldn't need to.
I think there is not any problem with Western Digital drives, I've got
many reports of them
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Same cam be applied to shm ? Thus kernel Documentation/Changes
> should be changed:
[...]
>
> none/dev/shmshm defaults0 0
>
> to
>
> shm/dev/shmshm defaults0 0
>
Yes, I thought that I changed that :-( I
On 2001-01-11T22:20:56,
Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Then we decided to switch persistant connection off... But boa still wins.
>
> What is wrong here? I would expect transferates of a 3-4 megabytes over a
> localhost interface. The file is certainly in some kind of cache.
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 06:01:19PM +0100, Franz Sirl wrote:
> Why do the input handlers depend on CONFIG_USB_HID? On PPC we already have
> trouble with them depending on CONFIG_USB, so everybody has to select
> CONFIG_USB even if he just has ADB hardware.
Don't these input drivers _require_
Hi
I am very sorry for disturbing the kernel development with this question
which I suspect might be off topic. If I am totally off topic please tell
me where to find help in your flame mails.
I am developing a device driver (will be GPL) for a PCI board hosting two
Digital Signal Processors
Michael> Please read and comment! :)
There should be some discussion on what to do about filenames which
contain colons in such a setup. Moving a file w/ a colon from a fs
which does not support named streams to one which does should DTRT;
exactly what TRT is should be discussed.
-JimC
--
I got into a bragging game whose webserver is the fastest with Jim Nelson
one of the authors of the boa webserver. We finally settled on the Zeus
test to decide the battle.
First boa won hands down because it supports persistant connections. Boa
on port 6000. Khttpd on port 80:
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Could people with Athlons please verify that pre3 works for them?
It works very well wrt. fxsr.
-Udo.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Could people with Athlons please verify that pre3 works for them?
>
>
> Linus
Running nowuptime 6 minutes.
===
-- Tim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
ÏëÒªÓµÓÐÖ§³Ö2000ÈËͬʱÔÚÏߵĸöÈËÁÄÌìÊÒÂð?ÄãÀ´µ±¹ÜÀíÔ±!
¿ìÀ´ÉêÇëÍøÒ×Ãâ·Ñ¸öÈËÁÄÌìÊÒ http://ichat.163.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > us who have via chipset motherboards, suggesting that it is limited
> > to that chipset, that chipset is ubiquitous, or via chipset
> > motherboard owners are generally the complaining type. no idea which
> > applies there, either.
Sheesh, when you
on kernel.org you can get old kernels clear back to 0.01 in
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/Historic/
but some things are missing, though nothing major
what's missing that I'm most interested in is the linux boot-disk that
apparently came into being around .11.
to quote from
I think you missed an ifdef in ksyms,
We don't all have smp
also update Makefile
Garst
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Hi,
There is a compiler package that runs on DOS but not on Linux.
I was wondered how can i emulate DOS under linux so that i run the compile
package?. I have kernel 2.2.14-12. RH 6.2.
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> pretty darned impressive :-). Another oddity that someone else
> already reported: the ipv6 module shows a reference count of -1.
a ref count of -1 means the module decides when to unload.
-d
begin:vcard
n:Ford;David
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:www.blue-labs.org
adr:;;
version:2.1
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> Note that there was a precise reason for not implementing it as the TSC disable
> (infact at first in 2.2.x I was clearing the bigflag in x86_capabilities too).
> The reason is that the way TSC gets disabled breaks /proc/cpuinfo.
No.
It FIXES
Alan Cox wrote:
>> us who have via chipset motherboards, suggesting that it is limited
>> to that chipset, that chipset is ubiquitous, or via chipset
>> motherboard owners are generally the complaining type. no idea which
>> applies there, either.
>
>
> Or there are a lot of them. 90% of
"Christopher Friesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Manfred Bartz wrote:
>
> > Why a new system call?
> Well, you'd be accessing a different kernel variable--"ytime" instead of
> "xtime". This new variable wouldn't be adjusted when the system
> time/date was, it would start at zero and always
Dooh! Please ignore earlier bogus report of module loading
"trouble". This was my bad: an old init script was running
"modprobe -a". Sigh...
--
Bob Tracy[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
"We might
Maybe I missed the discussion, but why might "depmod -a" result
in every module getting installed? This didn't happen under any
of the 2.4.0-testX releases that I recall, and I ran every one of
those and the prerelease without this "trouble". Gotta say, the
screen output from running "lsmod"
e i think it was just fixed in pre3 ;-)
+ if (offsetof(struct task_struct, thread.i387.fxsave) & 15) {
+ extern void __buggy_fxsr_alignment(void);
+ __buggy_fxsr_alignment();
+ }
> GCC 2.95.2 -> PGCC 2.95.2(3?) patched. 2.4.0 compiles fine
>
>
On Fri, Jan 12 2001, Bill Crawford wrote:
> depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
>/lib/modules/2.4.0-ac7/kernel/drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.o
> depmod: queued_sectors
Apologies, I didn't think of modular SCSI/IDE for this...
--- /opt/kernel/linux-2.4.0-ac7/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c Fri
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 06:08:21PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Could people with Athlons please verify that pre3 works for them?
It works fine.
> It also makes the fxsr disable act the same way the TSC disable does.
Note that there was a precise reason for not implementing it as the TSC
GCC 2.95.2 -> PGCC 2.95.2(3?) patched. 2.4.0 compiles fine
init/main.o: In function `check_fpu':
init/main.o(.text.init+0x53): undefined reference to `__buggy_fxsr_alignment'
make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
On compiling (and recompiling) i get this fatal error. This function
does not exist
patch to let 2.4.1-pre3 compile on PIII
we are moving from HAVE_XMM to cpu_has_xmm right?
--
=
Mohammad A. Haque http://www.haque.net/
[EMAIL
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.0-ac7/kernel/drivers/scsi/scsi_mod.o
depmod: queued_sectors
--
/* Bill Crawford, Unix Systems Developer, ebOne, formerly GTS Netcom */
#include "stddiscl.h"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 08:58:00PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> A Duron box running 2.4.0-ac5 (and -ac6) shows NaN in many
> places (such as df output showing usage "nan%"). Right now I
> reverted back to 2.4.0-ac4 which does not show the problem.
> The kernel was compiled with CONFIG_MK7
Kernel 2.4.0-prerelease through 2.4.1-pre2
I recently got a Pioneer 105S 16x slot loading DVD drive and have been
getting lots os the following messages when playing dvds and cdroms
hdb: DSC timeout
hdb: cdrom_decode_status: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hdb:
Hello all,
I have kernel verison 2.2.14-12 version with RH6.2.
I do "cd /sbin" and i see "depmod" there in the /sbin
directory. But somehow seems like load module is not
working. Maybe this is the reason why system freezes happen
in my RH. A driver for a custom built pci card is not
loaded
The man pages for open, read and write say that if a file is opened
using the O_NONBLOCK flag, then read() and write() will always return
immediately and not block the calling process. This does not appear to
be true; but perhaps I am doing something wrong. If I open() a file (on
2.2.18) from a
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001 03:12:47 +0100,
Ingo Oeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>So why don't we use sth. like depmod for these issues and get the
>link order automagically (like we get module load order)?
depmod handles dependencies on symbols. Module Y needs a symbol from
module X so modprobe must
Could people with Athlons please verify that pre3 works for them?
It's basically Andrea's patch, but I moved the FPU save/restore games away
from arch/i386/lib/mmx.c, so that everything is properly done in one place
and others call the appropriate helper functions instead of thinking that
they
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 11:14:54AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>
> kiobufs are crap. Face it. They do NOT allow proper multi-page scatter
> gather, regardless of what the kiobuf PR department has said.
It's not surprising, since they were designed to
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 03:36:13PM -0600, Jens Petersohn wrote:
> My appologies if this has been asked before. I'm looking for
> Ingo Molnar's RAID patch for 2.2.18-final. I tried applying A2, but
> it has a number of conflicts in raid1.c which I cannot resolve in
> my meager spare time.
I had
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
2.4.0-ac7
o Export a KMALLOC_MAXSIZE for drivers to check (Hans Grobler)
| this is needed to verify things like firmware
| sizes passed by users
o Fix highmem compile issues (Ingo
Using 2.4, and the prereleases since about early December or so, I
have been seeing rsync dying with an error "write: unable to allocate
memory". Rsync is writing on a socket which is set non-blocking and
the write is apparently returning ENOMEM.
Is this actually a new behaviour, or just
--- linux-2.4.1-pre2-rfs-i/arch/i386/kernel/i386_ksyms.c~ Thu Dec
7 06:00:12 2000
+++ linux-2.4.1-pre2-rfs-i/arch/i386/kernel/i386_ksyms.cFri Jan
12 01:58:37 2001
@@ -71,6 +71,8 @@
EXPORT_SYMBOL(apm_info);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(gdt);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmu_cr4_features);
+
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 12:14:44AM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
> >What happens when we get a loop in init order because of binding and other init
> >order conflicts?
>
> The kernel does not support circular dependencies between providers and
> consumers. It does not matter whether they are built
On Thursday 11 January, Richard B. Johnson wrote ("Re: [2.2.18] outgoing connections
getting stuck in SYN_SENT"):
[...]
> You probably compiled your kernel with "CONFIG_INET_ECN" set.
> If so, you need to turn it OFF in /proc/sys/net/...something_ecn.
I don't have an ECN option available in
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, rdunlap wrote:
> Here's a patch to 2.2.19-pre7 that is essentially a backport of the
> 2.4.0 gate-A20 code.
>
> This speeds up booting on my fast-A20 board (Celeron 500 MHz, no KBC)
> from 2 min:15 seconds to .
>
> Kai, you reported that your system was OK with
Obvious, I guess.
--Kai
diff -ur linux-2.4.1-pre2/net/sunrpc/sunrpc_syms.c
linux-2.4.1-pre2-makefixes-3/net/sunrpc/sunrpc_syms.c
--- linux-2.4.1-pre2/net/sunrpc/sunrpc_syms.c Sat Apr 22 01:08:52 2000
+++ linux-2.4.1-pre2-makefixes-3/net/sunrpc/sunrpc_syms.c Fri Jan 12 01:00:40
+2001
I think the way to go is to do the INT 15-first; possibly augmented with
a "test before even doing INT 15"...
-hpa
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at work, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
-
To
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 02:23:53PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, if you boot a Linux 2.4.0 kernel with the
> "noapic" command line option, does behavior improve?
For the curious, here's a summary of some tests I did:
apic, 2 cpu's, no smp affinity -> network hangs under
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Mark Longair wrote:
> I'm having a problem where twice a day or so, any new tcp connection
> it gets stuck in SYN_SENT. Eventually this situation rights itself,
> but obviously in the meantime many services (e.g. squid, X) are
> broken. The machine does IP masquerdading
I sent this about a month ago. I think it's important. For what it's worth,
Doug Gilbert thought it was a good idea too. Can you please reconsider and
drop it in.
-
Late in the game, and possibly questionable, but it would be helpful to have
the (new) scsi timer functions externalized
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Takacs Sandor wrote:
> If I see it there is no raid patch for 2.2.18 final, only
> 2.2.18pre13. This patch (raid-2.2.18-A2) rejects some diffs. I will apply
> it by hand :)
I've allready done it:
http://www.escape.de/users/outback/linux/raid-2.2.18.bz2
But it's untested,
init/main.o: In function `check_fpu':
init/main.o(.text.init+0x53): undefined reference to
`__buggy_fxsr_alignment'
make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
On compiling (and recompiling) i get this fatal error. This function
does not exist anymore?
Shawn Starr.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
I'm having a problem where twice a day or so, any new tcp connection
it gets stuck in SYN_SENT. Eventually this situation rights itself,
but obviously in the meantime many services (e.g. squid, X) are
broken. The machine does IP masquerdading with ipchains, and
masqueraded connections through
The signature on man-pages-1.34.tar.gz is bad:
gpg: Signature made Sun Dec 24 10:56:01 2000 CST using DSA key ID
517D0F0E
gpg: BAD signature from "Linux Kernel Archives Verification Key
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
I retrieved the man pages from ftp.kernel.org and ftp.us.kernel.org
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Gregg Lloyd wrote:
>Hi,
>I have downloaded linux kernel 2.4.
>In /usr/src, I did untar the file:
>gzip -cd linux-2.4.0.tar.gz | tar xvf -
>I see several files being copied to several locations (/linux/Documentation,
>/linux/arch/..etc..). The problem is that there's no
On 2001.01.12 Gregg Lloyd wrote:
> the right 2.4 kernel?? (Kernel howto talks about going to /usr/src/linux and
> start compiling..but current /usr/src/linux is a link to my current 2.2.5
> kernel !!!)
>
So you have just wrote kernel2.4 OVER your kernel2.2.
Kernel tarballs always untar and
> > I don't know if it's the 2.4.0 I installed since few days, but before I
> never seen that on my PC.
>
> The PC (RH 6.2 + updates), looked fully freezed and Sysreq didn't
> work.
Sorry, It couldn't: the sysreq value in /proc/kernel/sysreq was 0, as the log
says. So maybe it could work and
Hi,
I have downloaded linux kernel 2.4.
In /usr/src, I did untar the file:
gzip -cd linux-2.4.0.tar.gz | tar xvf -
I see several files being copied to several locations (/linux/Documentation,
/linux/arch/..etc..). The problem is that there's no linux 2.4 directory created
under /usr/src
On 2001.01.11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > The "none" bit puzzles me the most.
>
> It is a common misconfiguration. Given a line
>
> device dir type options garbage
>
> in /etc/fstab, some umount versions will complain "device busy"
> when the umount fails. Thus, it is better to use
>
I don't know if it's the 2.4.0 I installed since few days, but before I never
seen that on my PC.
The PC (RH 6.2 + updates), looked fully freezed and Sysreq didn't
work. I had a Netscape window on my screen. The mouse didn't move.
I login without problem from another PC. I tried to kill the X
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Jens Petersohn wrote:
> > > try http://www.linuxraid.org/
> >
> Check lower on the page. There is a patch for the patch to bring it up
> to A3. This resulting patch will apply semi-cleanly (with fuzz) to the
> final kernel.
Oh, I see it. So, mingo why not create an A3
rpc_release_task is required by nfs.o.
--- net/sunrpc/sunrpc_syms.cFri Apr 21 19:08:52 2000
+++ net/sunrpc/sunrpc_syms.cThu Jan 11 18:01:50 2001
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpciod_up);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpc_new_task);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpc_wake_up_status);
I would just like to thank every one for your help. I have found the
problem and it is now working wonderfuly.
Micah
-Original Message-
From: "David Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Micah Gorrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, January 11, 2001 3:42 PM
"Udo A. Steinberg" wrote:
> "Udo A. Steinberg" wrote:
> >
> > The very strange stuff is umount at reboot:
> >
> > umount: none busy - remounted read-only
> > umount: /: device is busy
> > Remounting root-filesystem read-only
> > mount: / is busy
> > Rebooting.
Are you using devfs and do kernel
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 01:06:32PM +0100, Rasmus Andersen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 01:59:31PM +0200, Hans Grobler wrote:
> > Yes we know about this one. This is a bug that was killed, and then came
> > back to life. We're still trying to figure out how... :)
> >
> I feel that I must step
Andrea Arcangeli writes:
> This patch looks fine w.r.t. alignment but given the below seems called
> at runtime (not just at mount time) for performance and to save a dozen of bytes
> of kernel stack it would probably better to use the nfs_fh structure in
> 2.2.19pre7 for the in-kernel
>
> On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > > I tried to apply it. If I finish it I will send the patch to mingo :)
> >
> > try http://www.linuxraid.org/
>
> If I see it there is no raid patch for 2.2.18 final, only
> 2.2.18pre13. This patch (raid-2.2.18-A2) rejects some diffs. I will
sys_mount(), and probably others, calls free_page(0) when
no page was got. free_pages() allows for this explicitly if
CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM, and _appears_ to allow for it generally
by testing VALID_PAGE() - but that test is inadequate, if
over 1GB of memory then pagenr 0x4 can be wrongly freed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> These days umount is done by directory, not by device,
> since a device may be mounted multiple times, so
> I expect the silly message is gone.
> (Is your umount recent?)
>
> [But this is only about the "none". I don't know what is
> wrong in your situation.]
My
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I tried to apply it. If I finish it I will send the patch to mingo :)
>
> try http://www.linuxraid.org/
If I see it there is no raid patch for 2.2.18 final, only
2.2.18pre13. This patch (raid-2.2.18-A2) rejects some diffs. I will apply
it by hand :)
--
> I have been trying to increase the scalabilty of an email server that has
> been ported to Linux. It was originally written for Netware, and there we
> are able to provide over 30,000 connections at any given time. On Linux
> however select stops working after the first 1024 connections. I
> The "none" bit puzzles me the most.
It is a common misconfiguration. Given a line
device dir type options garbage
in /etc/fstab, some umount versions will complain "device busy"
when the umount fails. Thus, it is better to use
proc/proc proc
devpts /dev/pts devpts
> what's the maximum swap size
See mkswap(8), making sure you have a non-ancient page
(one that mentions Linux 2.1.117).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Matthias Juchem wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Richard Torkar wrote:
>
> > I do not have any PPP, and no kdb installed on that machine, neither do I
> > have procinfo. Shouldn't it say N/A or not found instead of the above? The
> > ppp part is not true ;-).
>
> > Other thing I thought about was
> I tried to apply it. If I finish it I will send the patch to mingo :)
try http://www.linuxraid.org/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Jens Petersohn wrote:
> My appologies if this has been asked before. I'm looking for
> Ingo Molnar's RAID patch for 2.2.18-final. I tried applying A2, but
> it has a number of conflicts in raid1.c which I cannot resolve in
> my meager spare time.
I tried to apply it. If I
CORRECTION:
> existing, widely-deployed filesystems (e.g., NFS, XFS, BeFS, HFS, etc.),
NTFS---^
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at
Its cool with me...
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Marcel J.E. Mol wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Below is a patch to fix some problems in the OnStream tape drive support
> in ide-tape.c.
>
> - It implements Early Warning (e.g. retuns ENOSPC) for reaching end-of-tape.
> This fixes a real nasty problem when
Hi guys,
Below is a patch to fix some problems in the OnStream tape drive support
in ide-tape.c.
- It implements Early Warning (e.g. retuns ENOSPC) for reaching end-of-tape.
This fixes a real nasty problem when writing beyond end-of-tape, rendering
the 'backup' more ore less useless.
-
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 04:47:00PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Are you judging based on the error message? The 'netdev watchdog ...'
> message is a generic error message that could have any number of
> causes. It's just saying, well, what it says :) The kernel was unable
> to transmit a packet
Frank de Lange wrote:
>
> OK, just one last addition to what has nearly become my own thread...
>
> I now am fairly certain that the problem (network stalls on multiprocessor systems)
>is not BP6 or NE2K-PCI specific. I found several postings which relate to similar
>problems on dissimilar
Udo, you write:
> Anyway, disabled both lpd and httpd from the startup scripts
> and now the bug is triggered *every* time. I cannot reboot
> a single time without partitions being busy. When neither
> lpd nor httpd run, fsck finds nothing wrong.
>
> The very strange stuff is umount at reboot:
>
My appologies if this has been asked before. I'm looking for
Ingo Molnar's RAID patch for 2.2.18-final. I tried applying A2, but
it has a number of conflicts in raid1.c which I cannot resolve in
my meager spare time.
Thanks in advance,
--Jens Petersohn
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
> I've checked a couple of other machines, different setups etc.
> all with -ac6 and all show this behavior - also the umount stuff.
Wait for -ac7 and see if that fixes it. I think I know whats up there
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
Nigel Gamble writes:
> That's why MontaVista's kernel preemption patch uses sleeping mutex
> locks instead of spinlocks for the long held locks.
Anyone who uses sleeping mutex locks is asking for trouble. Priority
inversion is an issue I dearly hope we never have to deal with in the
Linux
Em Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 04:01:08PM -0500, Richard B. Johnson escreveu:
> If all you need is a kernel buffer to store the stuff that will be
> written to NVRAM, then just use kmalloc(). It is virtual and will
s/kmalloc/vmalloc/
> seem contiguous to your driver.
- Arnaldo
-
To unsubscribe from
OK, just one last addition to what has nearly become my own thread...
I now am fairly certain that the problem (network stalls on multiprocessor systems) is
not BP6 or NE2K-PCI specific. I found several postings which relate to similar
problems on dissimilar hardware. Another interesting one
I jsut upgraded to 2.4.0 and I started getting eth timeouts after the machine
wakes from suspend. The sequence of log events is:
Jan 11 07:16:34 HOST apmd[420]: System Suspend
Jan 11 12:20:27 HOST kernel: PCI: Found IRQ 5 for device 00:0a.0
Jan 11 12:20:41 HOST apmd[420]: Normal Resume
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001, Kambo Lohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
; I am having the same problems, I have duplicated the hard lockups / ethernet
; hangs on two intel 815EE boards. It happens when send traffic through the
; onboard eepro100 is high, and sometimes running something like vmstat 1 in
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Paul Powell wrote:
> Our driver is trying to allocate a DMA buffer to flash
> an adapter's firmware. This can require as much as
> 512K ( of contiguous DMA memory ). We are using the
> function __get_free_pages( GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA, order
> ) . The call is failing if
"Udo A. Steinberg" wrote:
>
> The very strange stuff is umount at reboot:
>
> umount: none busy - remounted read-only
> umount: /: device is busy
> Remounting root-filesystem read-only
> mount: / is busy
> Rebooting.
I just noticed another strange effect:
ps uxa misses a couple dozen
Em Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 12:39:33PM -0800, Paul Powell escreveu:
> Our driver is trying to allocate a DMA buffer to flash an adapter's
> firmware. This can require as much as 512K ( of contiguous DMA memory ).
> We are using the function __get_free_pages( GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA, order)
> . The
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
> Opinion: Personally, I think the approach in Andrew's patch
>is the way to go.
>
>Not because it can give the absolute best results.
>But rather, it is because it says "here is where a lot
> of time is spent".
>
>
> " " == Andrea Arcangeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 07:30:49PM +0100, Trond Myklebust
> wrote:
>> OK. In that case my patch, would just be amended to eliminate
>> the redundant comparison as is the case below.
> This patch looks fine w.r.t.
Our driver is trying to allocate a DMA buffer to flash
an adapter's firmware. This can require as much as
512K ( of contiguous DMA memory ). We are using the
function __get_free_pages( GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA, order
) . The call is failing if 'order' is greater than 6.
The problem is seen on
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Dan Kegel wrote:
> select() is usually limited to 1024 file descriptors
oh hey, this limit is only a libc limit these days. you can do this:
#define MY_FD_SETSIZE (16384)
typedef struct {
__fd_mask __fds_bits[MY_FD_SETSIZE / __NFDBITS];
} my_fd_set;
#define
Alexander Viro wrote:
> > umount: none busy - remounted read-only
>
> > The "none" bit puzzles me the most. /etc/fstab and /etc/mtab
> > look perfectly ok.
> >
> > Has anyone got an idea? Everything worked well with 2.4.0 and
> > Alan's tree up to -ac4, didn't try ac5, and ac6 is what messes
>
Hm, the noapic option seems to help, as I'm currently beating the network to
death but it won't die... As the problem is elusive, it is hard to tell, and it
would not surprise me if the net dropped dead the moment this mail went
through, but current indication is that noapic makes the sudden
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Tobias Ringstrom wrote:
> When copying huge files from one disk to another (hda->hdc), I get the
> following error (after some hundred megabytes):
>
> hdc: timeout waiting for DMA
> ide_dmaproc: chipset supported ide_dma_timeout func only: 14
> hdc: irq timeout: status=0xd1
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Udo A. Steinberg wrote:
> > /dev/hdb1: Inode 522901, i_blocks is 64, should be 8. FIXED
> umount: none busy - remounted read-only
> The "none" bit puzzles me the most. /etc/fstab and /etc/mtab
> look perfectly ok.
>
> Has anyone got an idea? Everything worked well with
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I just wanted to let you know that I successfully ruined
> a CD with 2.4.0 + sym-2.1.0-20001230. The system is a RH 7.0
> with glibc-2.2-9, cdrecord-1.9.
Thanks for the report.
But with so tiny information, it gives about no usefulness
Hi Tim,
>> I got this non-fatal oops while loading the ppa module for my IOMEGA parallel
>> port ZIP drive.
>It doesn't look like it's related to the ZIP drive though:
>> Warning: kfree_skb passed an skb still on a list (from c8074fc1).
>> Oops: 0002
>> CPU:0
>> EIP:
Now that 2.4 is out, it will probably be a few .x releases until 2.5
begins.
A discussion on Named Streams and Extended Attributes was put off until
2.5 earlier in the 2.4 development cycle. For compatibility with
existing, widely-deployed filesystems (e.g., NFS, XFS, BeFS, HFS, etc.),
Linux
1 - 100 of 530 matches
Mail list logo
