Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?

2001-01-16 Thread Ton Hospel
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Steve VanDevender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ton Hospel writes: > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > I am afraid I have missed most earlier messages in this thread. > > > However, let me remark that the problem of

Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?

2001-01-16 Thread Steve VanDevender
Ton Hospel writes: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > I am afraid I have missed most earlier messages in this thread. > > However, let me remark that the problem of assigning a > > file descriptor is the one that is usually described by > > "priority

Mainboard with Serverworks HE Chipset

2001-01-16 Thread Matthias Schniedermeyer
#include I got a "Tyan Thunder HE-SL"-Mainboard today, which has a "Severworks ServerSet III HE"-Chipset. (2xPIII 933, 2x512MB PC133 ECC-Registered SDRAM) And i have one problem and one question. First the question. I have an uptime of phenomenal 29minutes and "cat /proc/interrupts" tells

Re: 2.4.1-pre7 raid5syncd oops

2001-01-16 Thread junio
> "NB" == Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: NB> On January 16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: NB> Or in short "this cannot happen" :-) NB> Is there any chance of a memory error? NB> Has this happened more than once? I have to confess that I was not running with the stock 2.4.1-pre7

Re: Is sendfile all that sexy?

2001-01-16 Thread Ton Hospel
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > I am afraid I have missed most earlier messages in this thread. > However, let me remark that the problem of assigning a > file descriptor is the one that is usually described by > "priority queue". The version of Peter van

Re: nfs client problem in kernel 2.4.0

2001-01-16 Thread Mogens Kjaer
Trond Myklebust wrote: > I'll bet it's the lseek that's screwing things up again. IIRC IRIX has > an export option to cause it to generate 32-bit readdir cookies. Could > you please try enabling it? Sorry, I forgot to mention this: This option was already enabled. Mogens -- Mogens Kjaer,

Where to get reiserfs-utils?

2001-01-16 Thread Michael D. Crawford
www & ftp.namesys.com seem to be down (or at least I get "no route to host) so I can't go look there. I get the impression that with previous patches utilities like "mkreiserfs" were in linux/fs/reiserfs/utils, but now that ReiserFS is in the main kernel tree the utilities aren't there. I've

VM: Undead swap messages at shutdown

2001-01-16 Thread Burton Windle
Hello Linux VM God :) I think I started seeing this about 2.4.0-ac6...when I shutdown my machine, I see tons of 'VM: Undead swap entry ###', where ### is some memory address. I can also reproduce this 100% by (for example) going into X, loading a lot of crap so that my 112mb ram is full

Re: .br blacklisted ?

2001-01-16 Thread Rik van Riel
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, David Ford wrote: > Rik van Riel wrote: > > On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, John O'Donnell wrote: > > > > > Only on my company's e-mail server. My company typically gets "zero" > > > emails from outside the US. If I get a piece of spam (sorry they are > > > typically from outside the

Re: [PLEASE-TESTME] Zerocopy networking patch, 2.4.0-1

2001-01-16 Thread Rik van Riel
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > BTW, I noticed what is left in blk-13B seems to be my work Yeah yeah, we'll buy you beer at the next conference... ;) Rik -- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...

Re: Caches, page coloring, virtual indexed caches, and more

2001-01-16 Thread Anton Blanchard
Hi, > Where do you do this? And how do you handle the case of aliases with kseg, > the giant kernel mapping. Aliases between user and kernel mappings of a page are handled by flush_page_to_ram the old interface) or {copy,clear}_user_page, flush_dcache_page and update_mmu_cache (new

Re: Caches, page coloring, virtual indexed caches, and more

2001-01-16 Thread Anton Blanchard
> Did you find any software that breaks due to the additional restriction > on the virtual addresses of mappings? Not yet. A good test of shared mmap coherency is a recent samba (2.2 and above) that uses tdb. Tdb relies on shared mmaps heavily and uncovered the bug when running on a dual

Re: 2.4.0-vmbigpatch compile problem

2001-01-16 Thread Rik van Riel
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote: > PF_RSSTRIM is not declared anywhere either in the linux-2.4.0 > sources or in the 2.4.0-vmbigpatch. Humm, I seem to have forgotten a `cp $i $i.orig` ;) Should be fixed in a newer patch. regards, -- Rik -- Virtual memory is like a game you

Re: Subtle MM bug

2001-01-16 Thread Rik van Riel
On 9 Jan 2001, Zlatko Calusic wrote: > Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Now if 2.4 has worse _performance_ than 2.2 due to one > > reason or another, that I'd like to hear about ;) > > > > Oh, well, it seems that I was wrong. :) > > First test: hogmem 180 5 = allocate 180MB and

Re: 'native files', 'object fingerprints' [was: sendpath()]

2001-01-16 Thread dean gaudet
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Ingo Molnar wrote: > But even user-space code could use 'native files', via the following, safe > mechanizm: so here's an alternative to ingo's proposal which i think solves some of the other objections raised. it's something i've proposed in the past under the name

Re: 2.4.1-pre7 raid5syncd oops

2001-01-16 Thread Neil Brown
On January 16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0003 > c01ccf91 > *pde = > Oops: 0002 > CPU:0 > EIP:0010:[] > Using defaults from ksymoops -t elf32-i386 -a i386 > EFLAGS: 00010086 > eax: ebx:

Re: 2.0.37 crashes immediately

2001-01-16 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Stefan Ring wrote: >Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 00:35:39 +0100 (MET) >From: Stefan Ring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII >Subject: 2.0.37 crashes immediately > >2.0.37+ kernels crash even before I can see the "Uncompressing

Re: Can't compile shmem.c in 2.4.0-ac9

2001-01-16 Thread Michael D. Crawford
My apologies I see this was already encountered and a patch submitted. 2.4.0-pre8 builds OK for me. Mike -- Michael D. Crawford GoingWare Inc. - Expert Software Development and Consulting http://www.goingware.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tilting at Windmills for a Better Tomorrow. - To

Re: Problem: Blank screen in X after heavy disk access (2.4 only)

2001-01-16 Thread Shane Shrybman
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Rodney M. Jokerst wrote: > Yes, I have the same motherboard / chipset. Thanks for your help! > > Rodney M. Jokerst > > On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Nathan Thompson wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 03:11:01PM -0600, Rodney M. Jokerst wrote: > > > This action causes my screen

eepro100 error messages

2001-01-16 Thread Kostas Nikoloudakis
Message from syslogd@zeus at Tue Jan 16 00:17:29 2001 ... zeus kernel: 00 to4 0 0 0 0011001. Message from syslogd@zeus at Tue Jan 16 00:26:38 2001 ... zeus kernel: 0:0: 0:0:0: 0: 0:0: 0:0: 0:0: 0:0:0: 0:0:0: 0:0: 0:0: 0 ind. Message from syslogd@zeus at

Can't compile shmem.c in 2.4.0-ac9

2001-01-16 Thread Michael D. Crawford
I get the following errors trying to build 2.4.0-ac9 just now. I'll send you my .config upon request, or post it on my website gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/home/mike/Kernel/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=i686-c -o shmem.o shmem.c

Re: Compiling 2.4.1-preX series

2001-01-16 Thread Shawn Starr
Fair enough, but something in bugs.h changed from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1-preX and broke my GCC, I shall recompile GCC with no PGCC patches however if this happens still then there's a problem somewhere. I dont know what FXSR is but there was no problem in 2.4.0 with this. diff include/asm-i386/bugs.h

Re: Compiling 2.4.1-preX series

2001-01-16 Thread Jes Sorensen
> "Shawn" == Shawn Starr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Shawn> Which compiler will compile the 2.4.1-preX series? Since 2.4.0, Shawn> my GCC 2.95.2 patched with PGCC 2.95.3 (which creates Shawn> pgcc-2.95.2) refuses to compile any versions after this. Which Shawn> is the next stable and binary

Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?

2001-01-16 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Michael Meissner] > Ummm, I just reread the 2.4 Changes file once again just to be sure, > and it did not cover this issue. So how the *$@% are people supposed > to "read some docs" to know about this, if the docs don't mention the > information. I know people have been complaining about this

Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix

2001-01-16 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Peter Samuelson] > > What if you copy both 'filename' and 'filename:ext' onto the same > > fs? Do they get combined into one file? [Michael Rothwell] > ON Ext2, you get two files. On NTFS, you get one file, and a stream > on that file. Yeah. I think that's broken. It gets worse when you

Re: eth1: Transmit timed out, status 0000, PHY status 0000

2001-01-16 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Urban Widmark wrote: >Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 23:59:33 +0100 (CET) >From: Urban Widmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: richard.morgan9 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: Mike A. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Linux Kernel mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN;

Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix

2001-01-16 Thread Michael Rothwell
> What if you copy both 'filename' and 'filename:ext' onto the same fs? > Do they get combined into one file? ON Ext2, you get two files. On NTFS, you get one file, and a stream on that file. > Any semantics by which 'filename:stream' and 'filename' refer to the > same file would be b0rken.

RE: int. assignment on SMP + ServerWorks chipset

2001-01-16 Thread Duncan Laurie
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > > > > A Linux-USB user (pem@ = Petr) reported that USB (OHCI) wasn't > > working on his Intel STL2 system. This system uses a ServerWorks > > chipset, hence the OHCI part. > > Does it work with

Compiling 2.4.1-preX series

2001-01-16 Thread Shawn Starr
Which compiler will compile the 2.4.1-preX series? Since 2.4.0, my GCC 2.95.2 patched with PGCC 2.95.3 (which creates pgcc-2.95.2) refuses to compile any versions after this. Which is the next stable and binary compatable compiler? Anyone have any suggestions? I dont wish to use the development

/proc/PID/stat format

2001-01-16 Thread apark
What is the format of /proc/PID/stat for 2.2.x? In particular I'm interested in knowing start time of a process. Thanks - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Does reiserfs really meet the "Linux-2.4.x patch submissionpolicy"?

2001-01-16 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Aaron Lehmann wrote: > On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 08:55:58PM +0100, Andr? Dahlqvist wrote: > > I was very surprised when I checked my local kernel.org mirror this > > morning, and noticed that the latest 2.4.1 pre-patch had grown to > > ~180 kb in size. I was even more

Re: Does reiserfs really meet the "Linux-2.4.x patch submission policy"?

2001-01-16 Thread Aaron Lehmann
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 08:55:58PM +0100, Andr? Dahlqvist wrote: > I was very surprised when I checked my local kernel.org mirror this > morning, and noticed that the latest 2.4.1 pre-patch had grown to > ~180 kb in size. I was even more surprised when I realized that the > inclusion of reiserfs

Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?

2001-01-16 Thread Michael Meissner
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 12:32:05AM +0100, J . A . Magallon wrote: > If that is your idea of the average user... You're a system administrator, > you can have tons of scsi cards in your system if you want. > > You want to make things SOOO easy for a 'dummy' user, and that user will never > use

Re: [PATCH] maestro3 oops + fix (for ac9!)

2001-01-16 Thread Zach Brown
> D'oh, looks like if power management is disabled, pmdev is NULL (I get > that message when I load the module), but we try to derefence it anyways. > The fix is obvious: duh, yeah, I'll send out a proper patch that handles the pm_register failure too. thanks. -- zach - To unsubscribe from

Re: named streams, extended attributes, and posix

2001-01-16 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Michael Rothwell] > It seems that if you move a file with a colon -- "file:colon" -- in > the name from Ext2 to "StreamFS," you would end up with a file named > "file" with a stream named "colon". When copying back, you would get > "file:colon" back. What if you copy both 'filename' and

What happened to merge_segments()?

2001-01-16 Thread D . W . Howells
Can someone tell me what happened to the merge_segments() function in mm/mmap.c? I was using it in my Wine accelerator module, but it's no longer present. Cheers, David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 2.0.37 crashes immediately

2001-01-16 Thread Dr. Kelsey Hudson
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Stefan Ring wrote: > 2.0.37+ kernels crash even before I can see the "Uncompressing linux..." > message. I use the same configuration for 2.0.36 and 2.0.37 (basically > it's the default configuration without anything interesting changed), and > the latter just won't work. It

Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?

2001-01-16 Thread Dr. Kelsey Hudson
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, J . A . Magallon wrote: > You want to make things SOOO easy for a 'dummy' user, and that user will never > use them. The average user you are targetting says: 'daddy, buy me a PC to > run Quake and do my school jobs' or 'please, dear vendor, I want a PC to > do my

console spin_lock

2001-01-16 Thread James Simmons
Some time ago a intel i810 framebuffer driver was written. It only worked for 2.2.X. With 2.4.X a spinlock is used in the upper layers of the console system. Sooner or later we are going to run into the situtation where we will have graphics hardware which has no vga core and wih be purely

Re: [patch] sendpath() support, 2.4.0-test3/-ac9

2001-01-16 Thread dean gaudet
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, dean gaudet wrote: > > > > just for kicks i've implemented sendpath() support. > > > > > > _syscall4 (int, sendpath, int, out_fd, char *, path, off_t *, off, size_t, size) > > > > hey so how do you implement transmit timeouts with

Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?

2001-01-16 Thread Dr. Kelsey Hudson
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Michael Meissner wrote: > > you're forgetting that in /etc/lilo.conf there is a directive called > > 'append='... all the user has to do is merely add > > 'append="scsihosts=whatever,whatever"' into their config file and rerun > > lilo. problem solved > > That's assuming

Re: lance.c @ 100Mbit

2001-01-16 Thread Eli Carter
Thanks to all who pointed out the pcnet32.c driver! (And quickly, too. Perhaps one day I'll learn to do a "grep -i 79C973 drivers/net/*" first. *sigh*) Now to see if I can get it to work on an ARM-based system...gotta love lack of cache-coherance. ;) (dma_cache_inv, etc.) I'm open to

2.0.37 crashes immediately

2001-01-16 Thread Stefan Ring
2.0.37+ kernels crash even before I can see the "Uncompressing linux..." message. I use the same configuration for 2.0.36 and 2.0.37 (basically it's the default configuration without anything interesting changed), and the latter just won't work. It also doesn't matter if I use zImage or bzImage.

Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?

2001-01-16 Thread J . A . Magallon
On 2001.01.16 Michael Meissner wrote: > On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 12:01:12PM -0800, Dr. Kelsey Hudson wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Venkatesh Ramamurthy wrote: .. > > besides, how many 'end-users' do you know of that will have multiple scsi > > adapters in one system? how many end-users -period-

[Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]

2001-01-16 Thread Rick Jones
> : >Agreed -- the hard-coded Nagle algorithm makes no sense these days. > : > : The fact I dislike about the HP-UX implementation is that it is so > : _obviously_ stupid. > : > : And I have to say that I absolutely despise the BSD people. They did > : sendfile() after both Linux and HP-UX had

Re: Locking problem in 2.2.18/19-pre7? (fs/inode.c and fs/dcache.c)

2001-01-16 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 12:10:31PM -0800, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > Actually, looking at the fast path of down_trylock compared to huge mess > of code that's currently there, I actually suspect that using > down_trylock() would actually be faster, since in the fast path case > there would only

Re: super_operations in -pre7

2001-01-16 Thread Andreas Dilger
Mattew Wilcox writes: > several new operations have been added to super_operations, presumably > as part of the reiserfs merge. write_super_lockfs and unlockfs are > never called. can we remove them? These operations were added to co-ordinate filesystem backups/snapshots for journalling

Re: eth1: Transmit timed out, status 0000, PHY status 0000

2001-01-16 Thread Urban Widmark
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, richard.morgan9 wrote: > I have the same problem as Urban with a recent DLink 530tx > (rhine2). Pulling the power cable from my atx psu (while the > computer was "off") fixed the card, until my next reboot from > win98. I'm not the one with a problem but maybe it has

RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?

2001-01-16 Thread Venkatesh Ramamurthy
> You seem to be full of things that "we" can implement. So I just have > to wonder: do you by any chance have some prototype code somewhere to > figure out, reliably, which SCSI cards have BIOS extensions enabled, > and the order they hook in? > [Venkat] It would be a very bad idea

Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?

2001-01-16 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Venkatesh Ramamurthy] > [Venkatesh Ramamurthy] I think there should be a better way to handle > this , compiling is one of the options, but an end-user should not > think of compiling. The end user needs to put an another card and > connect drives and get his system up and running. He should not

Re: lance.c @ 100Mbit

2001-01-16 Thread Barry K. Nathan
> Quick question: has anyone used the lance.c driver for a 100BaseT > network PCI device? If so, what successes/failures did you run into? Never used lance.c for 100BaseT (can it do that?). I've used the pcnet32.c driver, however. > (I'm working with an Am79C973 chip.) In my case, Am79C971.

Re: SCSI partitions

2001-01-16 Thread David Lang
in part it is due to the major/minor split which only gives 4 bits for the partition number. if you use devfs or LVM this limit is removed. David Lang On Tue, 16 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:10:41 -0800 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Re: lance.c @ 100Mbit

2001-01-16 Thread Richard B. Johnson
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Eli Carter wrote: > Quick question: has anyone used the lance.c driver for a 100BaseT > network PCI device? If so, what successes/failures did you run into? > > (I'm working with an Am79C973 chip.) Sure. It's the pcnet32.c file (not lance from which it came). It works

Re: lance.c @ 100Mbit

2001-01-16 Thread Cort Dougan
} Quick question: has anyone used the lance.c driver for a 100BaseT } network PCI device? If so, what successes/failures did you run into? } } (I'm working with an Am79C973 chip.) I'd recommend the pcnet32.c driver for that chip, instead. I was running it for a little over a year at 100Mbps

RE: Oops with 4GB memory setting in 2.4.0 stable

2001-01-16 Thread Rainer Mager
Hi again, It looks like some progress is being made, *wonderful*, as to some earlier questions... > I'll have a look tonight or so. It works for you on non-bigmem? Yes. Absolutely no problems on non-bigmem. > smb_rename suggests mv, but the process is ls ... er? What commands where

Re: eth1: Transmit timed out, status 0000, PHY status 0000

2001-01-16 Thread richard.morgan9
>> On Sun, 14 Jan 2001, Urban Widmark wrote: >> >> >> eth1: Transmit timed out, status , PHY status , >> >> resetting... >> >[snip] >> >> Keeps going nonstop until I ifdown eth1. >> >> >> >> Card worked fine 2 days ago... >> > >> >So what did you change? >> >> Nothing. >> >> >Has the

Re: Oops with 4GB memory setting in 2.4.0 stable

2001-01-16 Thread Urban Widmark
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > If there is new dentry, which is at fpos postion, and it is child of > readdir-ed directory, we should return it anyway, no? There must not be > two ncpfs dentries with same d_parent and d_fsdata if d_fsdata != 0, > as each dentry can be in only one

Re: G400 behavior different, 2.2.18->2.4.0

2001-01-16 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 16 Jan 01 at 17:16, Chad Miller wrote: (added [EMAIL PROTECTED], as he may be interested in one range behind bridge overlapping both forwarding ranges...) > #00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8371 [KX133 AGP] (prog-if \ > #00 [Normal decode]) > # Flags: bus master, 66Mhz,

lance.c @ 100Mbit

2001-01-16 Thread Eli Carter
Quick question: has anyone used the lance.c driver for a 100BaseT network PCI device? If so, what successes/failures did you run into? (I'm working with an Am79C973 chip.) TIA, Eli . "To the systems programmer, users and applications Eli Carter | serve only to

Re: 2.4.0-x features ?

2001-01-16 Thread Pierre Rousselet
"Albert D. Cahalan" wrote: > > Pierre Rousselet writes: > > > 1) top (procps-2.0.7) gives me the messages : > > 'bad data in /proc/uptime' > > 'bad data in /proc/loadavg' > > cat /proc/uptime > > 1435.30 904.74 > > cat /proc/loadavg > > 0.01 0.21 0.29 1/17 19444 > > What is wrong ? > > Which

Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?

2001-01-16 Thread John Summerfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Like the ext2 labels? (man e2label) > [Venkatesh Ramamurthy] This re-ordering of the scsi drives should be > done by SCSI ML , so is incorporating ext2 fs data structure knowledge > on the SCSI ML a good idea?. You'd better not care what the drives ae called -

Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?

2001-01-16 Thread John Summerfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > [Venkatesh Ramamurthy] If we can truly go for label based mouting > and lilo'ing this would solve the problem. Anybody doing this? Red hat Linux 7.0. -- Cheers John Summerfield http://www2.ami.com.au/ for OS/2 & linux information. Configuration, networking,

Re: G400 behavior different, 2.2.18->2.4.0

2001-01-16 Thread Chad Miller
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 10:40:51PM +, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > [X] Output under 2.2.x is correct: '/25' for 32MB range. I have no idea > why X complains about region D600-D7FF - can you look at > '... regions behind bridge' when you boot 2.2.x (they are on 0:01.0 > device, AFAIK) ?

super_operations in -pre7

2001-01-16 Thread Matthew Wilcox
several new operations have been added to super_operations, presumably as part of the reiserfs merge. write_super_lockfs and unlockfs are never called. can we remove them? -- Revolutions do not require corporate support. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: Problem: Blank screen in X after heavy disk access (2.4 only)

2001-01-16 Thread Rodney M. Jokerst
Yes, I have the same motherboard / chipset. Thanks for your help! Rodney M. Jokerst On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Nathan Thompson wrote: > On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 03:11:01PM -0600, Rodney M. Jokerst wrote: > > This action causes my screen to go blank in X and remain blank > > unless I move the mouse

Re: 2.4.0-x features ?

2001-01-16 Thread Pierre Rousselet
John Fremlin wrote: > > "Albert D. Cahalan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > 1) top (procps-2.0.7) gives me the messages : > > > 'bad data in /proc/uptime' > > > 'bad data in /proc/loadavg' > > > cat /proc/uptime > > > 1435.30 904.74 > > > cat /proc/loadavg > > > 0.01 0.21 0.29 1/17 19444 >

Re: Problem: Blank screen in X after heavy disk access (2.4 only)

2001-01-16 Thread Nathan Thompson
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 03:11:01PM -0600, Rodney M. Jokerst wrote: > This action causes my screen to go blank in X and remain blank > unless I move the mouse or type on the keyboard. The second I stop doing > one of these activities, it goes blank again. While it is blank, it seems > to be

Re: G400 behavior different, 2.2.18->2.4.0 (was: matroxfb o

2001-01-16 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 16 Jan 01 at 15:55, Chad Miller wrote: > (CC'd to lkml) > > On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 07:31:33PM +, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > > There is something wrong with your hardware. First region for G400 should > > be 32MB, not 16MB (even if you have 16MB G400, which I doubt). > > Ooo! Here's an

Re: Oops with 4GB memory setting in 2.4.0 stable

2001-01-16 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 16 Jan 01 at 21:17, Urban Widmark wrote: > The smbfs dircache needs to find/kmap all of its cache pages since the > entries in it are variable length and the way it is called. It would be > nice to change that. > > I haven't looked at all your detailed comments yet. They may not matter if >

Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?

2001-01-16 Thread Michael Meissner
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 10:01:25PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 03:37:57PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote: > > don't assume that the way your system gets booted is the way everybody's does, > > particularly those on platforms other than the x86. > > > > I must say, as a 5

Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?

2001-01-16 Thread Andreas Dilger
Kelsey Hudson writes: > however, this brings up an interesting question: what happens if two disks > (presumably from two different machines) have the same disk label? what > happens then? for instance, i have several linux machines both at my > workplace and my home. if for some reason one of

Re: Name of SCSI Device

2001-01-16 Thread Andreas Dilger
You write: > If we install a SCSI hard disk drive, with ID3, an nothing on ID1 or ID2, > will be sda. If we install a new disk on ID1, the drive that before was > sda now change the name to sdb. > > Why the name of hard disk drive of SCSI Controller are not fixed? > ID0=sda > ID1=sdb > ID2=sdc

Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?

2001-01-16 Thread Andreas Dilger
David Woodhouse writes: > There are patches available for the 2.2 kernel which provide the facility > to mount by UUID or volume label. It seems that nobody is actively > maintaining those at the moment. If you want to update those to the current > 2.2 and 2.4 kernels, well volunteered. I'm

Problem: Blank screen in X after heavy disk access (2.4 only)

2001-01-16 Thread Rodney M. Jokerst
With all of the late 2.3 kernels, 2.4 test kernels, and the latest official 2.4.0 kernel that I have tried, I get disturbing behavior during and after heavy disk access, such as uploading a 500MB file from the local network. This action causes my screen to go blank in X and remain blank unless I

Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?

2001-01-16 Thread Timur Tabi
** Reply to message from "Christopher Friesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 16 Jan 2001 14:54:23 -0500 > > The Mac never enumerates its devices like the PC does (no C: D: etc, no > > /dev/sda, /dev/sdb, or anything like that). It also remembers the boot device > > in its EEPROM (the Startup

Re: [PATCH] make drivers/scsi/atari_scsi.c check request_irq (240p3)

2001-01-16 Thread Rasmus Andersen
Hi again. The following patch should correct the request_irq mistake. (The zero return on failure seems to be required by scsi/scsi.c and is what everybody else does.) Other comments? :) --- linux-ac9/drivers/scsi/atari_scsi.c.org Sun Jan 14 19:41:56 2001 +++

Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?

2001-01-16 Thread Andi Kleen
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 03:37:57PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote: > don't assume that the way your system gets booted is the way everybody's does, > particularly those on platforms other than the x86. > > I must say, as a 5 year Linux user (and 23 year UNIX user/administrator), I do > get tired

G400 behavior different, 2.2.18->2.4.0 (was: matroxfb on 2.4.0 / PCI: Failed to allocate...)

2001-01-16 Thread Chad Miller
(CC'd to lkml) On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 07:31:33PM +, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > There is something wrong with your hardware. First region for G400 should > be 32MB, not 16MB (even if you have 16MB G400, which I doubt). Ooo! Here's an edited diff of 'lspci -v' under 2.2.18 versus 2.4.0:

Re: 4G SGI quad Xeon - memory-related slowdowns

2001-01-16 Thread Mark Hemment
Hi Paul, > 2) Other block I/O output (eg dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdi bs=4M) also > run very slowly What do you notice when running "top" and doing the above? Does the "buff" value grow high (+700MB), with high CPU usage? If so, I think this might be down to nr_free_buffer_pages(). This

RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?

2001-01-16 Thread Venkatesh Ramamurthy
> Of course that would be better. The only complaint I have with such a > system is that of backwards compatibility...as long as the legacy device > names are still supported i would have no problem with it at all. > > however, this brings up an interesting question: what happens if two disks

Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?

2001-01-16 Thread Michael Meissner
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 12:01:12PM -0800, Dr. Kelsey Hudson wrote: > On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Venkatesh Ramamurthy wrote: > > > > This is due to the fixed ordering of the scsi drivers. You can change the > > > order of the scsi hosts with the "scsihosts" kernel parameter. See > > >

oops 2.2.18

2001-01-16 Thread octave klaba
Hi, on 2.2.17 & 2.2.18 we have this kernel panic: it begins with: no vm86_info: BAD ksymoops 2.3.7 on i686 2.2.18RAID. Options used -V (default) -k /proc/ksyms (default) -l /proc/modules (default) -o /lib/modules/2.2.18RAID/ (default) -m /usr/src/linux/System.map

Re: HP Pavilion 8290 HANGS on boot 2.4/2.4-test9

2001-01-16 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > >Is there a safe way to add debug information like simple string prints in > >arch/i386/boot/compressed/head.s and in arch/i386/kernel/head.S > >so that I can see at the console where the boot process hangs? > > Time for another version of my VIDEO_CHAR patch.] What abourt early_printk?

RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?

2001-01-16 Thread Dr. Kelsey Hudson
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Venkatesh Ramamurthy wrote: > [Venkatesh Ramamurthy] Dont you think that mounting and booting > based on disk label names is better, then relying on device nodes which can > change when a new card is added?. The existing patch for 2.2.xx is quite > small and it does

Re: Does reiserfs really meet the "Linux-2.4.x patch submission policy"?

2001-01-16 Thread Linus Torvalds
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, =?us-ascii?Q?Andr=E9?= Dahlqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Don't get me wrong, I am personally really excited that reiserfs was >included. I just thought that you basically wanted 2.4.1 to be "boring". Reiserfs inclusion in 2.4.1 was basically the plan for

Update on RTS/CTS serial problem with 2.4.0

2001-01-16 Thread Richard B. Johnson
I previously reported a problem trying to disable hardware flow-control of serial ports in the Linux kernel 2.4.0. This problem did not exist in Linux version 2.2.18. This problem occurs when the initial console has been redirected out to a serial port as is the case with one of our embedded

Re: Oops with 4GB memory setting in 2.4.0 stable

2001-01-16 Thread Urban Widmark
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > smb_get_dircache looks suspicious to me, as it can try to map unlimited > number of pages with kmap. And kmaps are not unlimited resource... > You have 512 kmaps, but one SMBFS cache page can contain about 504 > pages... So two smbfs cached

RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?

2001-01-16 Thread Venkatesh Ramamurthy
> you're forgetting that in /etc/lilo.conf there is a directive called > 'append='... all the user has to do is merely add > 'append="scsihosts=whatever,whatever"' into their config file and rerun > lilo. problem solved > > besides, how many 'end-users' do you know of that will have multiple

Failure to mount INITRD on a 1GB or 2GB machine w/ 4GB bigmem enabled. (2.4.0)]

2001-01-16 Thread Adam Scislowicz
Using the 2.4.0 kernel and a kernel compiled with support for 4GB of memory, mounting of the initial ramdisk fails when 1GB or more of memory is installe dint he system. There is no OOPS, it simply says, unable to mount root vfs, I ma thinking the INITRD system cant handle the offset's involved

Re: Locking problem in 2.2.18/19-pre7? (fs/inode.c and fs/dcache.c)

2001-01-16 Thread tytso
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:33:34 +0100 From: Andrea Arcangeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Of course, this is utterly unsafe on an SMP machines, since access to > the "block" variable isn't protected at all. So the first question is Wrong, it's obviously protected by the inode_lock. And

[BUG] Panic in smp_call_function_interrupt

2001-01-16 Thread Jean-Marc Saffroy
Hello, When I discovered the nice "smp affinity" feature, I gave it a try on our old SMP testbed (quad P100 with 2 Adaptec AIC-7870 SCSI adapters). And by chance, I discovered that the following command causes an oops (after a couple of seconds), even without any kind of smp affinity :

Name of SCSI Device

2001-01-16 Thread Carles Pina i Estany
Hi, When we install a IDE hard disk drive, and configure as Master and connect on Primary IDE Interface, this disk WILL BE ALWAYS hda. We can install other hard disks (e.g. hdb, hdc...) but the disk that it is connected as hda, will not change. If we install a SCSI hard disk drive, with ID3,

Re: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?

2001-01-16 Thread Christopher Friesen
Timur Tabi wrote: > And this is a problem that has plagues all PC operating systems, but has never > been a problem on the Macintosh. Why? Because the Mac was designed to handle > this problem, but the PC never was. > > The Mac never enumerates its devices like the PC does (no C: D: etc, no

Re: bug (isdn-subsystem?) in 2.4.0

2001-01-16 Thread Ronny Buchmann
Kai Germaschewski wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Ronny Buchmann wrote: > > >> i have the following problem with kernel 2.4.0 (also with -ac6): >> >> kernel BUG at slab.c:1095! >> invalid operand: >> CPU: 0 > > > I could reproduce the problem, the appended patch fixes it here. Linus, >

RE: Linux not adhering to BIOS Drive boot order?

2001-01-16 Thread Dr. Kelsey Hudson
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Venkatesh Ramamurthy wrote: > > This is due to the fixed ordering of the scsi drivers. You can change the > > order of the scsi hosts with the "scsihosts" kernel parameter. See > > linux/drivers/scsi/scsi.c > [Venkatesh Ramamurthy] I think it would be a nice idea if

Does reiserfs really meet the "Linux-2.4.x patch submission policy"?

2001-01-16 Thread André Dahlqvist
Hi Linus I was very surprised when I checked my local kernel.org mirror this morning, and noticed that the latest 2.4.1 pre-patch had grown to ~180 kb in size. I was even more surprised when I realized that the inclusion of reiserfs was the reason for this. While I am certainly happy for the

Ethernet Bonding Performance under kernel 2.4.0

2001-01-16 Thread Jonathan Earle
Hi all, I've a system comprosed of two PIII machines, equipped with Znyx 346Q 4port ethernet cards (tulip driver) which I'd like to connect together in a bonded configuration. For various reasons, we require 2.4.0 kernels on our machines - currently we are using 2.4.0-test9. The setup is

[PATCH] rrunner.c

2001-01-16 Thread Val Henson
This patch for the RoadRunner HIPPI driver includes: * Fix crash on null dereference in rr_interrupt due to firmware bug * Fix crash on null dereference in rr_interrupt with better link ON/OFF handling * Fix crash due to NIC continuing to DMA after HALT (requires firmware >= 2.0.67) Plus

PROBLEM: 2.4.1-pre7 hard freeze

2001-01-16 Thread root
PROBLEM: 2.4.1-pre7 hard freeze [1.] One line summary of the problem: Hard freeze [2.] Full description of the problem/report: Hard freeze while working on the console. 2.2.18 runs without any problem on this computer. [3.] Keywords (i.e., modules, networking, kernel): kernel [4.] Kernel

Re: SCSI partitions

2001-01-16 Thread Brian Gerst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Does anyone remember the reason why SCSI drives were limited to > 15 partitions? Because of the limitations of having 8-bit major/minor device numbers. -- Brian Gerst - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

  1   2   3   4   5   >