Re: Bumping required kernels to 3.0 for Linux backports ?

2014-04-10 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Wed, 9 Apr 2014 14:06:13 -0700, > Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 01:52:29PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> > On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman >> > wrote: >> > > On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] pinctrl: Rename Broadcom Capri pinctrl driver

2014-04-10 Thread Matt Porter
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 06:51:12PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Linus Walleij > wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Sherman Yin wrote: > > > >> To be consistent with other Broadcom drivers, the Broadcom Capri pinctrl > >> driver and its related CONFIG

Re: [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: Introduce DEBUG_VMALLOCINFO to reduce spinlock contention

2014-04-10 Thread Andi Kleen
Richard Yao writes: > Performance analysis of software compilation by Gentoo portage on an > Intel E5-2620 with 64GB of RAM revealed that a sizeable amount of time, > anywhere from 5% to 15%, was spent in get_vmalloc_info(), with at least > 40% of that time spent in the _raw_spin_lock() invoked

[PATCH] perf machine: Search for modules in %s/lib/modules/%s

2014-04-10 Thread Richard Yao
Modules installed outside of the kernel's build system should go into "%s/lib/modules/%s/extra", but at present, perf will only look at them when they are in "%s/lib/modules/%s/kernel". Lets encourage good citizenship by relaxing this requirement to "%s/lib/modules/%s". This way open source

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] pinctrl: Rename Broadcom Capri pinctrl driver

2014-04-10 Thread Linus Walleij
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Sherman Yin wrote: > >> To be consistent with other Broadcom drivers, the Broadcom Capri pinctrl >> driver and its related CONFIG option are renamed to bcm281xx. >> >> Devicetree compatible string and

Re: pstore wierdness on Dell Latitude E6530.

2014-04-10 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Wed, 09 Apr 2014 14:02:04 -0700, Tony Luck said: > Take a look at this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/30/83 > > I think there were some bugs in the console-efi code a while > back - perhaps you ran a kernel had the bug and made all these > duplicate entries? The cited patch pair isn't

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] pinctrl: Rename Broadcom Capri pinctrl driver

2014-04-10 Thread Linus Walleij
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Sherman Yin wrote: > To be consistent with other Broadcom drivers, the Broadcom Capri pinctrl > driver and its related CONFIG option are renamed to bcm281xx. > > Devicetree compatible string and binding documentation use > "brcm,bcm11351-pinctrl" to match the

[PATCH] mm/vmalloc: Introduce DEBUG_VMALLOCINFO to reduce spinlock contention

2014-04-10 Thread Richard Yao
Performance analysis of software compilation by Gentoo portage on an Intel E5-2620 with 64GB of RAM revealed that a sizeable amount of time, anywhere from 5% to 15%, was spent in get_vmalloc_info(), with at least 40% of that time spent in the _raw_spin_lock() invoked by it. The spinlock call is

Re: [PATCH v2 08/14] DMA: edma: Use different eventq for cyclic channels

2014-04-10 Thread Joel Fernandes
On 04/01/2014 08:06 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > To improve latency with cyclic DMA operation it is preferred to > use different eventq/tc than the default which is used by all > other drivers (mmc, spi, i2c, etc). > When preparing the cyclic dma ask for non default queue for the > channel which is

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth0: Hardware Error

2014-04-10 Thread Borislav Petkov
Hi guys, let me answer to all of you here: On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 03:45:41PM +, Ertman, DavidX M wrote: > Could you also provide some information about the configuration > of the system when this happens? AFAIR, this happens when I stick the network cable in. I'll pay attention to the

Re: WARNING ... drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c...

2014-04-10 Thread poma
On 08.04.2014 03:29, poma wrote: > ... > Command line: initrd=initrd.img > inst.stage2=hd:LABEL=Fedora\x20rawhide\x20x86_64 xdriver=modesetting > BOOT_IMAGE=vmlinuz > Kernel command line: initrd=initrd.img > inst.stage2=hd:LABEL=Fedora\x20rawhide\x20x86_64 xdriver=modesetting >

Re: hpsa driver bug crack kernel down!

2014-04-10 Thread Woodhouse, David
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 09:19 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > dmar: DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [02:00.0] fault addr > > > > > >> > > > > 7f61e000 > > > > That "Present bit in context entry is clear" fault means that we have > > not set up *any* mappings for this PCI deviceā€¦

[PATCH] ARM: zImage: ensure header in LE format for BE8 kernels

2014-04-10 Thread Taras Kondratiuk
From: Nico Pitre All known BE8-capable systems have LE bootloaders, so we need to ensure that the magic number and image start/end values are in little endian format. [ben.do...@codethink.co.uk: from nico's original email on this subject] Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks [taras.kondrat...@linaro.org:

Re: mm: kernel BUG at mm/huge_memory.c:1829!

2014-04-10 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
Hi, On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 04:44:36PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > Okay, below is my attempt to fix the bug. I'm not entirely sure it's > correct. Andrea, could you take a look? The possibility the interval tree implicitly broke the walk order of the anon_vma list didn't cross my mind,

Re: [PATCHv3 5/5] net: rfkill: gpio: hard-code the gpio names

2014-04-10 Thread Linus Walleij
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > There is no need to dynamically generate the names. This > will fix a static checker warning.. > > net/rfkill/rfkill-gpio.c:144 rfkill_gpio_probe() > warn: variable dereferenced before check 'rfkill->name' > > Reported-by: Dan

Re: [PATCHv3 2/5] net: rfkill: gpio: remove unused and obsolete platform parameters

2014-04-10 Thread Linus Walleij
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > After upgrading to descriptor based gpios, the gpio numbers > are not used anymore. The power_clk_name and the platform > specific setup and close hooks are not used by anybody, and > we should not encourage use of such things, so removing

Re: [PATCH v2 05/14] arm: common: edma: Select event queue 1 as default when booted with DT

2014-04-10 Thread Joel Fernandes
On 04/01/2014 08:06 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > Use the EVENTQ_1 for default and leave the EVENTQ_0 to be used by high > priority channels, like audio. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi This looks good, though another way to do it would be to leave default to Queue 0. Put audio in Queue 1, and

Re: [PATCH] gpio / ACPI: Prevent potential wrap of GPIO value on OpRegion read

2014-04-10 Thread Linus Walleij
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote: > Dan Carpenter's static code checker reports: > > The patch 473ed7be0da0: "gpio / ACPI: Add support for ACPI GPIO > operation regions" from Mar 14, 2014, leads to the following static > checker warning: > >

Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: MSM8974: Add pinctrl node

2014-04-10 Thread Linus Walleij
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Timur Tabi wrote: >> Back in July, Qualcomm submitted a patch that added this information into >> the device tree: >> >> http://marc.info/?t=13718516613=1=2 >> >> However, this was rejected. Now it

Re: [PATCH 1/5] sched: Convert thread_group_cputime() to use for_each_thread()

2014-04-10 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 09:49:57PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Anyway, I'll look over the stuff tomorrow. That patch was missing useful clues.. Also, I shot __for_each_thread in the head, it seemed useless. --- include/linux/sched.h | 11 ++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5

[GIT PULL] X86 platform driver updates

2014-04-10 Thread Matthew Garrett
Hi Linus, Support for the new keyboard features on the Thinkpad Carbon, a bunch of updates for the Sony and Toshiba drivers, a new driver for upcoming Alienware hardware and a few misc fixes. There's a couple of patches that got Acked today but aren't invasive, so I'll send a further PR for

Re: [PATCH 4/4] pinctrl: msm: Add definitions for the APQ8064 platform

2014-04-10 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > This adds pinctrl definitions for the GPIO pins of the TLMM v2 block in the > Qualcomm APQ8064 platform. > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson Patch applied for next. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

[PATCH v2] x86/xen: Fix 32-bit PV guests's usage of kernel_stack

2014-04-10 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
Commit 198d208df4371734ac4728f69cb585c284d20a15 ("x86: Keep thread_info on thread stack in x86_32") made 32-bit kernels use kernel_stack to point to thread_info. That change missed a couple of updates needed by Xen's 32-bit PV guests: 1. kernel_stack needs to be initialized for secondary CPUs 2.

Re: [PATCH 3/4] pinctrl: msm: Add documentation for pinctrl-apq8064 binding

2014-04-10 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > DT bindingdocumentation for qcom,apq8064-pinctrl driver. > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson No news in this binding. Patch applied for next. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: [PATCH 2/4] pinctrl: msm: Make number of functions variable

2014-04-10 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > The various pins may have different number of functions defined, so make this > number definable per pin instead of just increasing it to the largest one for > all of the platforms. > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson Patch applied for

[PATCHSET 0/7] perf tools: Update on filtered entries' percentage output (v8)

2014-04-10 Thread Namhyung Kim
Hello, I added --percentage option to perf report to control display of percentage of filtered entries. usage: perf report [] --percentage how to display percentage of filtered entries "relative" means it's relative to filtered entries only so that the sum

[PATCH 1/7] perf hists: Add support for showing relative percentage

2014-04-10 Thread Namhyung Kim
When filtering by thread, dso or symbol on TUI it also update total period so that the output shows different result than no filter - the percentage changed to relative to filtered entries only. Sometimes this is not desired since users might expect same results with filter. So new filtered_*

Re: [PATCH 1/4] pinctrl: msm: Correct interrupt code for TLMM v2

2014-04-10 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > Acking interrupts are done differently between on v2 and v3, so add an extra > attribute to the pingroup struct to let the platform definitions control this. > Also make sure to start dual edge detection by detecting the rising edge. > >

Re: [PATCH] gpio / ACPI: Don't crash on NULL chip->dev

2014-04-10 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote: > Commit aa92b6f689ac (gpio / ACPI: Allocate ACPI specific data directly in > acpi_gpiochip_add()) moved ACPI handle checking to acpi_gpiochip_add() but > forgot to check whether chip->dev is NULL before dereferencing it. > > Since

[PATCH 4/7] perf diff: Add --percentage option

2014-04-10 Thread Namhyung Kim
The --percentage option is for controlling overhead percentage displayed. It can only receive either of "relative" or "absolute" and affects -c delta output only. For more information, please see previous commit same thing done to "perf report". Acked-by: Jiri Olsa Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim

[PATCH 2/7] perf report: Add --percentage option

2014-04-10 Thread Namhyung Kim
The --percentage option is for controlling overhead percentage displayed. It can only receive either of "relative" or "absolute". "relative" means it's relative to filtered entries only so that the sum of shown entries will be always 100%. "absolute" means it retains the original value before

Re: [PATCH RFC v5 2/2] clk: Add handling of clk parent and rate assigned from DT

2014-04-10 Thread Rob Herring
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 6:26 AM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > This patch adds a helper function to configure clock parents and > rates as specified in clock-parents, clock-rates DT properties > for a consumer device and a call to it before driver is bound to > a device. > > Signed-off-by: Sylwester

[PATCH 5/7] perf tools: Add hist.percentage config option

2014-04-10 Thread Namhyung Kim
Add hist.percentage option for setting default value of the symbol_conf.filter_relative. It affects the output of various perf commands (like perf report, top and diff) only if filter(s) applied. An user can write .perfconfig file like below to show absolute percentage of filtered entries by

[PATCH 3/7] perf top: Add --percentage option

2014-04-10 Thread Namhyung Kim
The --percentage option is for controlling overhead percentage displayed. It can only receive either of "relative" or "absolute". Move the parser callback function into a common location since it's used by multiple commands now. For more information, please see previous commit same thing done to

[PATCH 6/7] perf ui/tui: Add 'F' hotkey to toggle percentage output

2014-04-10 Thread Namhyung Kim
Add 'F' hotkey to toggle relative and absolute percentage of filtered entries. Suggested-by: Jiri Olsa Acked-by: Jiri Olsa Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim --- tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c |4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c

Re: hpsa driver bug crack kernel down!

2014-04-10 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
[+cc Steve and iss_storagedev, remove "storagedev" which bounced (apparent typo)] On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Baoquan He wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The kernel is 3.14.0+ which is pulled just now. >> >> >> [ 18.402695] systemd[1]: Set

[PATCH 7/7] perf tools: Show absolute percentage by default

2014-04-10 Thread Namhyung Kim
Now perf report will show absolute percentage on filter entries by default. Suggested-by: Jiri Olsa Acked-by: Jiri Olsa Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim --- tools/perf/util/symbol.c |1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/symbol.c b/tools/perf/util/symbol.c index

[PATCH] softirq: punt to ksoftirqd if __do_softirq recently looped

2014-04-10 Thread Rik van Riel
Jiri noticed that netperf throughput had gotten worse in recent years, for smaller message sizes. In the past, ksoftirqd would take around 80% of a CPU, and netserver would take around 100% of another CPU. On current kernels, sometimes all the softirq processing is done in the context of the

Re: [PATCH for 3.14.y] x86/efi: Make efi virtual runtime map passing more robust

2014-04-10 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 03:00:09PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > Hi Greg, > > please take the patch into the stable 3.14.y queue. It fixes a number > of EFI machines which makes a stable backport a good thing. Before you > apply it though, cherry-pick 42a5477251f on which this patch depends. >

Re: [PATCH 3.4 000/134] 3.4.87-stable review

2014-04-10 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 01:31:31AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 04/09/2014 08:21 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.4.87 release. > >There are 134 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > >to this one. If anyone has any

Re: system hang

2014-04-10 Thread g...@kroah.com
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 07:59:38AM +, Narasimharao Bolisetti wrote: > > Hi, > > I have checked the same in the recent kernel versions also. Issue is still > remain. What versions have you tried, and what are the logs from those versions? > ::DISCLAIMER:: >

[GIT PULL] Block fixes for 3.15-rc1

2014-04-10 Thread Jens Axboe
Hi Linus, A small collection of fixes that should go in before -rc1. The pull request contains: - A two patch fix for a regression with block enabled tagging caused by a commit in the initial pull request. One patch is from Martin and ensures that SCSI doesn't truncate 64-bit block flags,

RE: [E1000-devel] e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth0: Hardware Error

2014-04-10 Thread Ronciak, John
Boris, What kind of system (platform) is this happening on? It's a LOM correct? Can you run 'lspci -vvv' and output the results? Thanks. Cheers, John > -Original Message- > From: Borislav Petkov [mailto:b...@alien8.de] > Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 5:00 AM > To:

Re: hpsa driver bug crack kernel down!

2014-04-10 Thread Davidlohr Bueso
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 16:34 +0800, Jiang Liu wrote: > Hi Baoquan, > Could you please help to give output of "lspci -"? Attached. > Is device "hpsa :03:00.0" a legacy PCI device(non-PCIe)? > It may have relationship with IOMMU driver. I honestly don't know. PCI is way out of my

RE: [E1000-devel] e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth0: Hardware Error

2014-04-10 Thread Ertman, DavidX M
> -Original Message- > From: Fujinaka, Todd [mailto:todd.fujin...@intel.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 7:59 AM > To: Borislav Petkov; e1000-de...@lists.sourceforge.net > Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; lkml > Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] e1000e :00:19.0 eth0: Hardware Error > > We

Re: hpsa driver bug crack kernel down!

2014-04-10 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Baoquan He wrote: > Hi, > > The kernel is 3.14.0+ which is pulled just now. > > > [ 18.402695] systemd[1]: Set hostname to > . > [ 18.408456] random: systemd urandom read with 70 bits of entropy > available > [ 18md[1]: Expecting device >

Re: [PATCH V3 4/5] mfd: palmas: support IRQ inversion at the board level

2014-04-10 Thread Stephen Warren
On 04/10/2014 01:04 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > Stephen, any news about this patch? I'm waiting for it to be merged in > order to resend some Tegra DTs, but still cannot see it in -next. To be honest, this became too painful to work on just to fix a warning at boot which has no practical

Re: [RFC PATCH RT] rwsem: The return of multi-reader PI rwsems

2014-04-10 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:03:36 +0200 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 04/10/2014 04:44 PM, Clark Williams wrote: > > The means of each group of five test runs are: > > > > vanilla.log: 1210117 rt.log: 17210953 (14.2 x slower than > > vanilla) rt-fixes.log: 10062027 (8.3 x slower than

Re: hpsa driver bug crack kernel down!

2014-04-10 Thread Woodhouse, David
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 09:14 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > Thus, my first guess would be that we are quite happily setting up the > > requested DMA maps on the *wrong* IOMMU, and then taking faults when the > > device actually tries to do DMA. > > > I like the "wrong IOMMU (or no IOMMU at all)"

Re: hpsa driver bug crack kernel down!

2014-04-10 Thread Linda Knippers
On 4/10/2014 11:14 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:46 AM, Woodhouse, David > wrote: > >>> DMAR:[fault reason 02] Present bit in context entry is clear >>> dmar: DRHD: handling fault status reg 602 >>> dmar: DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [02:00.0]

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] usb: ehci-exynos: Return immediately from suspend if ehci_suspend fails

2014-04-10 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Vivek Gautam wrote: > Patch 'b8efdaf USB: EHCI: add check for wakeup/suspend race' > adds a check for possible race between suspend and wakeup interrupt, > and thereby it returns -EBUSY as error code if there's a wakeup > interrupt. > So the platform host controller should

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] usb: ehci-platform: Return immediately from suspend if ehci_suspend fails

2014-04-10 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Vivek Gautam wrote: > Patch 'b8efdaf USB: EHCI: add check for wakeup/suspend race' > adds a check for possible race between suspend and wakeup interrupt, > and thereby it returns -EBUSY as error code if there's a wakeup > interrupt. > So the platform host controller should

[PATCH v6] ASoC: fsl_sai: Add clock controls for SAI

2014-04-10 Thread Nicolin Chen
The SAI mainly has the following clocks: bus clock control and configure registers and to generate synchronous interrupts and DMA requests. mclk1, mclk2, mclk3 to generate the bit clock when the receiver or transmitter is configured for an internally generated bit clock. So

[GIT PULL] sound fixes for 3.15-rc1

2014-04-10 Thread Takashi Iwai
Linus, please pull sound fixes for v3.15-rc1 from: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound.git tags/sound-fix-3.15-rc1 The topmost commit is a5065eb6da55b226661456e6a7435f605df98111 sound fixes for 3.15-rc1

[PATCH v6] ASoC: fsl_sai: Add clock controls for SAI

2014-04-10 Thread Nicolin Chen
The SAI mainly has the following clocks: bus clock control and configure registers and to generate synchronous interrupts and DMA requests. mclk1, mclk2, mclk3 to generate the bit clock when the receiver or transmitter is configured for an internally generated bit clock. So

Re: hpsa driver bug crack kernel down!

2014-04-10 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:46 AM, Woodhouse, David wrote: >> > > >> > > > > DMAR:[fault reason 02] Present bit in context entry is clear >> > > >> > > > > dmar: DRHD: handling fault status reg 602 >> > > >> > > > > dmar: DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [02:00.0] fault addr >> > > >> > > > >

Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/2] tracing: syscall_regfunc() should not skip kernel threads

2014-04-10 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:46:55 +0200 Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > I mean, the tracepoint is > > activated usually by humans, and if they enabled it just as a usermode > > helper is activated, and those are really fast to run, do we even care > > if it is missed? > > A user space task spawned by

[PATCH] staging: unisys: fix copyright notices

2014-04-10 Thread Romer, Benjamin M
This patch replaces the inconsistent copyright symbols in each source file with (C). Signed-off-by: Benjamin Romer --- drivers/staging/unisys/channels/channel.c | 2 +- drivers/staging/unisys/channels/chanstub.c | 2 +-

Re: [RFC PATCH RT] rwsem: The return of multi-reader PI rwsems

2014-04-10 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 04/10/2014 04:44 PM, Clark Williams wrote: > The means of each group of five test runs are: > > vanilla.log: 1210117 rt.log: 17210953 (14.2 x slower than > vanilla) rt-fixes.log: 10062027 (8.3 x slower than vanilla) > rt-multi.log: 3179582 (2.x x slower than vanilla) > > > As expected,

Re: [RFC PATCH RT] rwsem: The return of multi-reader PI rwsems

2014-04-10 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 09:44:30 -0500 Clark Williams wrote: > I wrote a program named whack_mmap_sem which creates a large (4GB) > buffer, then creates 2 x ncpus threads that are affined across all the > available cpus. These threads then randomly write into the buffer, > which should cause page

Re: [Query]: tick-sched: can idle_active be false in tick_nohz_idle_exit()?

2014-04-10 Thread Frederic Weisbecker
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 05:28:57PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Hi Guys, > > File: kernel/time/tick-sched.c > function: tick_nohz_idle_exit() > > We are checking here if idle_active is true or not and then > do some stuff. But is it possible that idle_active be false > here? > > The sequence as

[PATCH 2/2] [RFC v2 with seqcount] reservation: add suppport for read-only access using rcu

2014-04-10 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
op 10-04-14 13:08, Thomas Hellstrom schreef: On 04/10/2014 12:07 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: Hey, op 10-04-14 10:46, Thomas Hellstrom schreef: Hi! Ugh. This became more complicated than I thought, but I'm OK with moving TTM over to fence while we sort out how / if we're going to use this.

RE: [E1000-devel] e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth0: Hardware Error

2014-04-10 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
We also need to know what part you're using. "lspci | grep Ethernet" should narrow that down. Thanks. Todd Fujinaka Software Application Engineer Networking Division (ND) Intel Corporation todd.fujin...@intel.com (503) 712-4565 -Original Message- From: Borislav Petkov

Re: [PATCH v5] ASoC: fsl_sai: Add clock controls for SAI

2014-04-10 Thread Nicolin Chen
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:07:47PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 07:23:12PM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote: > > The SAI mainly has the following clocks: > > bus clock > > control and configure registers and to generate synchronous > > interrupts and DMA requests. > > > >

Re: [PATCH] unisys: staging: Check for s-Par firmware before initializing s-Par modules

2014-04-10 Thread Romer, Benjamin M
On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 12:25 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > Patches need to do only one thing, so can you please split this up in to > multiple patches, each one only doing one thing. Sorry about that! I'll send another patch that fixes all of the copyright statements at once then. :) > You

Re: [PATCH v7 4/6] pci: Introduce a domain number for pci_host_bridge.

2014-04-10 Thread Liviu Dudau
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 03:07:44PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 10 April 2014 07:50:52 Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Wednesday 09 April 2014 21:48:14 Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > >> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Liviu Dudau

Re: [PATCH 0/6] File Sealing & memfd_create()

2014-04-10 Thread Colin Walters
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:32 AM, ty...@mit.edu wrote: Looking at your patches, and what files you are modifying, you are enforcing this in the low-level file system. I would love for this to be implemented in the filesystem level as well. Something like the ext4 immutable bit, but with the

Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/2] tracing: syscall_regfunc() should not skip kernel threads

2014-04-10 Thread Oleg Nesterov
On 04/10, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:38:55 +0200 > Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > > However, this means that a user-space task spawned by > > > > call_usermodehelper() won't report the system calls if > > > > kernel_execve() is called when sys_tracepoint_refcount != 0. > > > >

Re: [RFC PATCH RT] rwsem: The return of multi-reader PI rwsems

2014-04-10 Thread Clark Williams
On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 15:19:22 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote: > This patch is built on top of the two other patches that I posted > earlier, which should not be as controversial. > > If you have any benchmark on large machines I would be very happy if > you could test this patch against the

Re: mm: kernel BUG at mm/huge_memory.c:1829!

2014-04-10 Thread Sasha Levin
On 04/10/2014 10:37 AM, Dave Jones wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 04:45:58PM +0800, Bob Liu wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:37 PM, Sasha Levin > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > While fuzzing with trinity inside a KVM tools guest running the latest > -next > > > kernel, I've

Re: [PATCH 5/9] crypto: qce: Adds sha and hmac transforms

2014-04-10 Thread Stanimir Varbanov
Hi Stephen, thanks for the comments. On 04/09/2014 03:09 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 04/03, Stanimir Varbanov wrote: >> +static void qce_ahash_dma_done(void *data) >> +{ >> +struct crypto_async_request *async_req = data; >> +struct ahash_request *req = ahash_request_cast(async_req); >>

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] managed token devres interfaces

2014-04-10 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:46:53 +0100 One Thousand Gnomes escreveu: > > For example, some devices provide standard USB Audio Class, handled by > > snd-usb-audio for the audio stream, while the video stream is handled > > via a separate driver, like some em28xx devices. > > Which is what mfd is

Re: [Query]: tick-sched: why don't we stop tick when we are running idle task?

2014-04-10 Thread Frederic Weisbecker
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 04:19:44PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 9 April 2014 16:03, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > Hi Frederic, > > > > File: kernel/time/tick-sched.c > > Function: tick_nohz_full_stop_tick() > > > > We are doing this: > > > > if (!tick_nohz_full_cpu(cpu) || is_idle_task(current)) > >

Re: mm: kernel BUG at mm/huge_memory.c:1829!

2014-04-10 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 04:45:58PM +0800, Bob Liu wrote: > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:37 PM, Sasha Levin wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > While fuzzing with trinity inside a KVM tools guest running the latest > > -next > > kernel, I've stumbled on the following: > > > > Wow! There are so many

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] managed token devres interfaces

2014-04-10 Thread Shuah Khan
On 04/10/2014 05:38 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Hi Alan, Em Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:04:35 +0100 One Thousand Gnomes escreveu: - Construct string with (dev is struct em28xx *dev) format: "tuner:%s-%s-%d" with the following:

Re: [RFC PATCH RT] rwsem: The return of multi-reader PI rwsems

2014-04-10 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:28:43 +0200 Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 16:18 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 15:19 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > If you have any benchmark on large machines I would be very happy if > > > you could test this patch

Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate rip-relative call's

2014-04-10 Thread Denys Vlasenko
On 04/10/2014 04:18 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 04/10, Denys Vlasenko wrote: >> >> There is this monstrosity, "16-bit override for branches" in 64-mode: >> >> 66 e8 nn nn callw >> >> Nobody sane uses it because it truncates instruction pointer. >> >> Or rather, *I think* it should

Re: [RFC PATCH RT] rwsem: The return of multi-reader PI rwsems

2014-04-10 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 16:18 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 15:19 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > If you have any benchmark on large machines I would be very happy if > > you could test this patch against the unpatched version of -rt. > > Too bad I don't have (and know

Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/2] tracing: syscall_regfunc() should not skip kernel threads

2014-04-10 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:38:55 +0200 Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 04/10, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 19:06:16 +0200 > > Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > > syscall_regfunc() ignores the kernel thread because "it has > > > no effect", see cc3b13c1 "Don't trace kernel thread syscalls".

Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate rip-relative call's

2014-04-10 Thread Oleg Nesterov
On 04/10, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > (2014/04/10 22:41), Denys Vlasenko wrote: > > On 04/09/2014 05:43 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > >> On 04/08, Jim Keniston wrote: > >>> > >>> On Sun, 2014-04-06 at 22:16 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > 0xe8. Anything else? > >>> > >>> No, I think e8 is the only

Re: [PATCH v7 18/22] xip: Add xip_zero_page_range

2014-04-10 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 12:15:12PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > + /* > > +* ext4 sometimes asks to zero past the end of a block. It > > +* really just wants to zero to the end of the block. > > +*/ > Then we should really fix ext4 I believe... Since

Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: governor: menu: move repeated correction factor check to init

2014-04-10 Thread Tuukka Tikkanen
On 10 April 2014 16:43, Chander Kashyap wrote: > In menu_select function we check for correction factor every time. > If it is zero we are initializing to unity. Hence move it to init function > and initialise by unity, hence avoid repeated comparisons. > > Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap > --- >

Re: [PATCH v7 17/22] Get rid of most mentions of XIP in ext2

2014-04-10 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 12:04:35PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > On Sun 23-03-14 15:08:43, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > The only remaining usage is userspace's 'xip' option. > Looks good. You can add: > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara I've been thinking about this patch, and I'm not happy with it any more :-)

Re: [PATCH v7 15/22] Remove CONFIG_EXT2_FS_XIP and rename CONFIG_FS_XIP to CONFIG_FS_DAX

2014-04-10 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 11:59:18AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > On Sun 23-03-14 15:08:41, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > The fewer Kconfig options we have the better. Use the generic > > CONFIG_FS_DAX to enable XIP support in ext2 as well as in the core. > > > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox > Looks

Re: [PATCH v7 12/22] ext2: Remove ext2_xip_verify_sb()

2014-04-10 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 11:52:54AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > - if ((sbi->s_mount_opt ^ old_mount_opt) & EXT2_MOUNT_XIP) { > > + if ((sbi->s_mount_opt ^ old_opts.s_mount_opt) & EXT2_MOUNT_XIP) { > > ext2_msg(sb, KERN_WARNING, "warning: refusing change of " > >

Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate rip-relative call's

2014-04-10 Thread Denys Vlasenko
On 04/10/2014 03:57 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > (2014/04/10 22:41), Denys Vlasenko wrote: >> On 04/09/2014 05:43 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: >>> On 04/08, Jim Keniston wrote: On Sun, 2014-04-06 at 22:16 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > 0xe8. Anything else? No, I think e8 is the

Re: [PATCH 3/3] cgroup: implement cgroup.subtree_populated for the default hierarchy

2014-04-10 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 09:04:24AM -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Except for the keeping state. If the userspace agent crashes when it > was meant to drop 100 cgroups when they become empty, then when it > restarts those 100 cgroups may never be freed. Of course userspace > can do things

Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate rip-relative call's

2014-04-10 Thread Oleg Nesterov
On 04/10, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > > There is this monstrosity, "16-bit override for branches" in 64-mode: > > 66 e8 nn nn callw > > Nobody sane uses it because it truncates instruction pointer. > > Or rather, *I think* it should truncate it (i.e. zero-extend to full width), > but

Re: [RFC PATCH RT] rwsem: The return of multi-reader PI rwsems

2014-04-10 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 15:19 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > If you have any benchmark on large machines I would be very happy if > you could test this patch against the unpatched version of -rt. Too bad I don't have (and know how to use) specjbb. I dug up old vmark, thinking I'd be able to get

Re: [PATCH v7 11/22] Replace ext2_clear_xip_target with dax_clear_blocks

2014-04-10 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 11:46:44AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > Another day, some more review ;) Comments below. I'm really grateful for all this review! It's killing me, though ;-) > > +int dax_clear_blocks(struct inode *inode, sector_t block, long size) > > +{ > > + struct block_device *bdev

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: SAMSUNG: remove gpio flags in dev-backlight

2014-04-10 Thread Alexandre Courbot
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Jingoo Han wrote: > On Thursday, April 10, 2014 1:17 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> >> Ping, can I have the Samsung folks review and ,aybe even merge this >> patch? enable_gpio_flags is never used in any code, is replaced by >> gpiod, and we would like to remove

Re: [PATCH v7 4/6] pci: Introduce a domain number for pci_host_bridge.

2014-04-10 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 10 April 2014 07:50:52 Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Wednesday 09 April 2014 21:48:14 Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Liviu Dudau wrote: > >> > On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 08:02:41AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas

Re: [PATCH v5] ASoC: fsl_sai: Add clock controls for SAI

2014-04-10 Thread Shawn Guo
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 07:23:12PM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote: > The SAI mainly has the following clocks: > bus clock > control and configure registers and to generate synchronous > interrupts and DMA requests. > > mclk1, mclk2, mclk3 > to generate the bit clock when the receiver

Re: [PATCH 3/3] cgroup: implement cgroup.subtree_populated for the default hierarchy

2014-04-10 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Tejun Heo (t...@kernel.org): > Hey, Serge. > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 05:08:55AM +0200, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > Quoting Tejun Heo (t...@kernel.org): > > > * It delivers events by forking and execing a userland binary > > > specified as the release_agent. This is a long deprecated

Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] uprobes/x86: Introduce uprobe_xol_ops and arch_uprobe->ops

2014-04-10 Thread Masami Hiramatsu
(2014/04/10 1:55), Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 04/09, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >> >> Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu > > Thanks! > > Does this mean that I can add the same into 6-8 you didn't ack > explicitely ? Ah, yes! You can add my reviewed-by to other patches in the series. Thank you, --

[PATCH v3 3/7] pinctrl: sunxi: add PL and PM pin definitions

2014-04-10 Thread Boris BREZILLON
Define PL and PM pin macros. Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON Acked-by: Maxime Ripard --- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sunxi.h | 68 + 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sunxi.h b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sunxi.h index

Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate rip-relative call's

2014-04-10 Thread Masami Hiramatsu
(2014/04/10 22:41), Denys Vlasenko wrote: > On 04/09/2014 05:43 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: >> On 04/08, Jim Keniston wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, 2014-04-06 at 22:16 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: 0xe8. Anything else? >>> >>> No, I think e8 is the only call instruction uprobes will see. >> >> Good. > >

[PATCH v3 0/7] ARM: sunxi: add multi pin controller support

2014-04-10 Thread Boris BREZILLON
Hello, This series rework the sunxi pinctrl driver to support the PL and PM pins available on the A31 SoC, which are controlled using the R_PIO block. This series add support for multi pin controller which was previously impossible for several reasons: 1) the pinctrl instance was registering a

[PATCH v3 6/7] pinctrl: sunxi: add reset control support

2014-04-10 Thread Boris BREZILLON
The A31 SoC define a reset line for the R_PIO block which needs to be deasserted. Try to retrieve a reset control and deassert if one was found. Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON --- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sunxi.c | 16 ++-- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff

[PATCH v3 4/7] pinctrl: sunxi: support multiple pin controller

2014-04-10 Thread Boris BREZILLON
Add support for multiple pin controller instances. First remove the static definition of the sunxi gpio chip struct and fill the dynamically struct instead. Then define a new pin_base field in the sunxi_pinctrl_desc which will be used to specify the gpiochip base pin. Signed-off-by: Boris

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >