Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] x86: Intel Processor Trace Logger

2015-07-28 Thread Takao Indoh
On 2015/07/29 14:44, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > Takao Indoh writes: > >> Hi all, >> >> This patch creates log buffer for Intel PT and enable logging at boot >> time. When kernel panic occurs, we can get this log buffer from >> crashdump file by kdump, and reconstruct the flow that led to the

RE: Re: [V2 PATCH 1/3] x86/panic: Fix re-entrance problem due to panic on NMI

2015-07-28 Thread 河合英宏 / KAWAI,HIDEHIRO
Hi, > From: linux-kernel-ow...@vger.kernel.org > [mailto:linux-kernel-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Hidehiro Kawai > (2015/07/27 23:34), Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Mon 27-07-15 10:58:50, Hidehiro Kawai wrote: [...] > > The check could be also relaxed a bit and nmi_panic would > > return

Re: [PATCH] input: twl4030-vibra: Fix ERROR: Bad of_node_put() warning

2015-07-28 Thread Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller
Hi all, Am 29.07.2015 um 05:13 schrieb Rob Herring : > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Belisko Marek > wrote: >> Hi Dmitry, >> >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:53 PM, Dmitry Torokhov >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:38:34PM +0200, Marek Belisko wrote: Fix following: [

Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: Avoid attempts to create duplicate symbolic links

2015-07-28 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 29-07-15, 03:38, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > The rule is supposed to be "all of the present CPUs which do not own > a policy should point to one, unless it doesn't exist". The right > approach is then to create links from them to a policy object as soon > as we create one for them. Waiting for

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] x86: Intel Processor Trace Logger

2015-07-28 Thread Alexander Shishkin
Takao Indoh writes: > Hi all, > > This patch creates log buffer for Intel PT and enable logging at boot > time. When kernel panic occurs, we can get this log buffer from > crashdump file by kdump, and reconstruct the flow that led to the panic. Good to see this work going forward! > Takao

Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] iommu/mediatek: Add mt8173 IOMMU driver

2015-07-28 Thread Yong Wu
On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 16:49 +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 27/07/15 16:31, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 02:23:26PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > >> On 16/07/15 10:04, Yong Wu wrote: > >>> This patch adds support for mediatek m4u (MultiMedia Memory Management > >>>

[PATCH 1/8] x86/vm86: Move vm86 fields out of thread_struct

2015-07-28 Thread Brian Gerst
Allocate a separate structure for the vm86 fields. Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst --- arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 11 +++--- arch/x86/include/asm/vm86.h | 19 - arch/x86/kernel/process.c| 3 +++ arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c| 46

[PATCH 3/8] x86/vm86: Eliminate kernel_vm86_struct

2015-07-28 Thread Brian Gerst
Now there is no vm86-specific data left on the kernel stack while in userspace, except for the 32-bit regs. Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst --- arch/x86/include/asm/vm86.h | 25 +--- arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c | 95 +++-- 2 files changed, 42

[PATCH 5/8] x86/vm86: Add a separate config option for hardware IRQ handling

2015-07-28 Thread Brian Gerst
Allow disabling hardware interrupt support for vm86. Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst --- arch/x86/Kconfig | 8 arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h | 10 -- arch/x86/include/asm/vm86.h| 20 ++-- arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c | 12

[PATCH 7/8] x86/vm86: Rename vm86->vm86_info to user_vm86

2015-07-28 Thread Brian Gerst
Make it clearer that this is the pointer to the userspace vm86 state area. Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst --- arch/x86/include/asm/vm86.h | 2 +- arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c | 70 +++-- 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH 4/8] x86/vm86: Use the normal pt_regs area for vm86

2015-07-28 Thread Brian Gerst
Change to use the normal pt_regs area to enter and exit vm86 mode. This is done by increasing the padding at the top of the stack to make room for the extra vm86 segment slots in the IRET frame. It then saves the 32-bit regs in the off-stack vm86 data, and copies in the vm86 regs. Exiting back

[PATCH 2/8] x86/vm86: Move fields from kernel_vm86_struct

2015-07-28 Thread Brian Gerst
Move the non-regs fields to the off-stack data. Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst --- arch/x86/include/asm/vm86.h | 16 arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c | 42 ++ 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH 8/8] x86/vm86: Rename vm86->v86flags and v86mask

2015-07-28 Thread Brian Gerst
Rename v86flags to veflags, and v86mask to veflags_mask. Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst --- arch/x86/include/asm/vm86.h | 4 ++-- arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c | 20 ++-- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/vm86.h

[PATCH 6/8] x86/vm86: Clean up vm86.h includes

2015-07-28 Thread Brian Gerst
vm86.h was being implicitly included in alot of places via processor.h, which in turn got it from math_emu.h. Break that chain and explicitly include vm86.h in all files that need it. Also remove unused vm86 field from math_emu_info. Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst ---

[PATCH v4] x86: vm86 cleanups

2015-07-28 Thread Brian Gerst
The goal of this set of patches is to change vm86 support to return to userspace with the normal exit paths instead of leaving data on the kernel stack and jumping directly into the exit asm routines. This fixes issues like ptrace and syscall auditing not working with vm86, and makes possible

Re: [PATCH v1 7/7] ARM: dts: ifc6410: add inforce LVDS panel support

2015-07-28 Thread Archit Taneja
Hi Srini, On 07/28/2015 06:24 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: This patch adds LVDS panel for IFC6410. Signed-off-by: Rob Clark [Rob Clark: WIP patch] Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla --- arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-ifc6410.dts | 66 ++ 1 file changed, 66

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Replace recover_policy with new_policy in cpufreq_online()

2015-07-28 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 29-07-15, 03:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > The recover_policy is unsed in cpufreq_online() to indicate whether > a new policy object is created or an existing one is reinitialized. > > The "recover" part of the name is slightly confusing (it should be >

Re: Next round: revised futex(2) man page for review

2015-07-28 Thread Darren Hart
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 09:11:41PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:23:51PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Jul 2015, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > > ... > > > >FUTEX_REQUEUE (since Linux 2.6.0) > > > .\" FIXME(Torvald) Is there some indication

Re: [Update 2x][PATCH 7/7] cpufreq: Separate CPU device registration from CPU online

2015-07-28 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 29-07-15, 03:03, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > +static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif) > +{ > + unsigned cpu = dev->id; > + int ret; > + > + dev_dbg(dev, "%s: adding CPU%u\n", __func__, cpu); > + > + if (cpu_online(cpu)) { > + ret =

[PATCH 2/2] rcu: Use call_rcu_func_to to replace explicit type equivalents

2015-07-28 Thread Boqun Feng
We have call_rcu_func_t for a quite while, but we still use explicit function pointer type equivalents in some places, this patch replace these equivalent types with call_rcu_func_t to gain better readability. Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng --- kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c | 2 +- kernel/rcu/tree.h

[PATCH 1/2] rcu: Use rcu_callback_t in call_rcu*() and friends

2015-07-28 Thread Boqun Feng
As we now have rcu_callback_t typedefs as the type of rcu callbacks, we should use it in call_rcu*() and friends as the type of parameters. This could save us a few lines of code and make it clear which function requires an rcu callbacks rather than other callbacks as its argument. Besides, this

[PATCH 0/2] Replace explicit function pointer types with rcu_callback_t and call_rcu_func_t

2015-07-28 Thread Boqun Feng
Commit ("rcu: Create a synchronize_rcu_mult()") in linux-rcu.git#rcu/next branch has introduced rcu_callback_t as the type for rcu callback functions and call_rcu_func_t has been introduced for a while. This patch series uses the rcu_callback_t and call_rcu_func_t to save a few lines of code.

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config option

2015-07-28 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > On 07/28/2015 08:47 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> >> On 29/07/2015 01:21, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Boris Ostrovsky >>> wrote: On 07/28/2015 01:07 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > On

Re: Next round: revised futex(2) man page for review

2015-07-28 Thread Darren Hart
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:23:51PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jul 2015, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: ... > >FUTEX_REQUEUE (since Linux 2.6.0) > > .\" FIXME(Torvald) Is there some indication that FUTEX_REQUEUE is broken > > .\" in general, or is this comment

[PATCH] Staging : wilc1000: Remove unnecessary parentheses

2015-07-28 Thread Shraddha Barke
Remove parentheses around the right hand side of an assignment as they are not needed The semantic patch used is : @@ expression E; expression f; constant C; @@ ( f = (E == C) | f = - ( E - ) ) Signed-off-by: Shraddha Barke --- drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_sdio.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1

Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] mtd: nand: Qualcomm NAND controller driver

2015-07-28 Thread Archit Taneja
On 07/29/2015 07:18 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: On 07/27/2015 09:34 PM, Archit Taneja wrote: Hi, On 07/25/2015 06:21 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: On 07/21/2015 03:34 AM, Archit Taneja wrote: + int size) +{Looks like a +struct desc_info *desc; +struct dma_async_tx_descriptor

RE: [PATCH v3 1/1] kernel/sysctl.c: Add /proc/sys/vm/shrink_memory feature

2015-07-28 Thread PINTU KUMAR
Sorry, for late reply. > -Original Message- > From: Mel Gorman [mailto:mgor...@suse.de] > Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 7:36 PM > To: PINTU KUMAR > Cc: a...@linux-foundation.org; cor...@lwn.net; vba...@suse.cz; > gorcu...@openvz.org; mho...@suse.cz; emun...@akamai.com; >

Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] toshiba_acpi: Remove "*not supported" feature prints

2015-07-28 Thread Darren Hart
Hi Azael, On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 07:22:26PM -0600, Azael Avalos wrote: > Currently the driver prints "*not supported" if any of the features > queried are in fact not supported, let us print the available > features instead. > > This patch removes all instances pr_info printing "*not

Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] toshiba_acpi: Change *available functions return type

2015-07-28 Thread Darren Hart
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 07:22:25PM -0600, Azael Avalos wrote: > This patch changes the *available functions return type from int to > void. > > The checks for support of their respective features are done inside > such functions and there was no need to return anything as we can > flag the

[PATCH RFC 2/3] x86: Add Intel PT logger

2015-07-28 Thread Takao Indoh
This patch provides Intel PT logging feature. When system boots with a parameter "intel_pt_log", log buffers for Intel PT are allocated and logging starts, then processor flow information is written in the log buffer by hardware like flight recorder. This is very helpful to investigate a cause of

Re: [PATCH v1 0/7] DT: APQ8064 for qcom-dt-next

2015-07-28 Thread Andy Gross
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 01:52:36PM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: > Hi Andy, > > As discussed here are some dt patches which depend on > pmic header "dt-bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.h" which is availble in > linux-next. Ok. I took all of these and put them on top of my 4.3 tags on the

Re: [PATCH v2] toshiba_acpi: Add set_fan_status function

2015-07-28 Thread Darren Hart
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 07:22:23PM -0600, Azael Avalos wrote: > This patch adds a new function named "set_fan_status" to complement > its get* counterpart, as well as to avoid code duplication between > "fan_proc_write" and "fan_store". > > Also, both functions (get*, set*) are now checking for

[PATCH RFC 3/3] x86: Stop Intel PT and save its registers when panic occurs

2015-07-28 Thread Takao Indoh
When panic occurs, Intel PT logging is stopped to prevent it from overwrite its log buffer. The registers of Intel PT are saved in the memory on panic, they are needed for debugger to find the last position where Intel PT wrote data. Signed-off-by: Takao Indoh ---

[PATCH RFC 1/3] x86: Add Intel PT common files

2015-07-28 Thread Takao Indoh
Rename existing intel_pt.h to intel_pt_perf.h as a perf-specific header, and make a new intel_pt.h as a common header of Intel PT feature. Also add intel_pt_cap.c for Intel PT capability stuff. Signed-off-by: Takao Indoh --- arch/x86/include/asm/intel_pt.h | 82 ++

Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] toshiba_acpi: Refactor *{get, set} functions return value

2015-07-28 Thread Darren Hart
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 07:22:27PM -0600, Azael Avalos wrote: > This patch changes the default return value of the driver *{get, set} > functions from 0 (success) to -EIO, since the driver default error > value is -EIO. > > All the functions now check for TOS_FAILURE, TOS_NOT_SUPPORTED and >

[PATCH RFC 0/3] x86: Intel Processor Trace Logger

2015-07-28 Thread Takao Indoh
Hi all, These patch series provide logging feature for Intel Processor Trace (Intel PT). Intel PT is a new feature of Intel CPU "Broadwell", it captures information about program execution flow. Here is a article about Intel PT. https://software.intel.com/en-us/blogs/2013/09/18/processor-tracing

RE: [PATCH] [trivial] i2c: Fix typo in i2c-bfin-twi.c

2015-07-28 Thread Zhang, Sonic
Acked-by: Sonic Zhang >-Original Message- >From: Masanari Iida [mailto:standby2...@gmail.com] >Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 7:11 PM >To: triv...@kernel.org; Zhang, Sonic; w...@the-dreams.de; >linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; >bryan...@analog.com >Cc: Masanari

Re: [PATCH] of/irq: introduce of_has_named_irqs helper

2015-07-28 Thread Vignesh R
On 07/28/2015 11:37 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:16:44PM +0530, R, Vignesh wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 7/28/2015 10:53 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 06:53:52PM +0530, Vignesh R wrote: Hi Dmitry, On 07/25/2015 01:46 AM, Dmitry Torokhov

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config option

2015-07-28 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > On 07/28/2015 08:47 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> >> On 29/07/2015 01:21, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Boris Ostrovsky >>> wrote: On 07/28/2015 01:07 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > On

Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] stm class: Introduce an abstraction for System Trace Module devices

2015-07-28 Thread Chunyan Zhang
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > A System Trace Module (STM) is a device exporting data in System Trace > Protocol (STP) format as defined by MIPI STP standards. Examples of such > devices are Intel Trace Hub and Coresight STM. > > This abstraction provides a unified

Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: rework spi nor read and write.

2015-07-28 Thread Michal Suchanek
On 28 July 2015 at 20:15, Marek Vasut wrote: > On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 at 11:23:02 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote: >> The spi_nor read and write functions pass thru the mtd retlen to the >> chip-specific read and write function. This makes it difficult to check >> for errors in read and write

Re: [PATCH 3/6] pci:host: Add Altera PCIe host controller driver

2015-07-28 Thread Rob Herring
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Ley Foon Tan wrote: > This patch adds the Altera PCIe host controller driver. > > Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan > --- > drivers/pci/host/Kconfig | 9 + > drivers/pci/host/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/pci/host/pcie-altera.c | 576 >

Re: [PATCH 4/6] pci: altera: Add Altera PCIe MSI driver

2015-07-28 Thread Dinh Nguyen
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:07 PM, Ley Foon Tan wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Ley Foon Tan wrote: >>> This patch adds Altera PCIe MSI driver. This soft IP supports configurable >>> number of vectors, which is a dts parameter. >>>

Re: Bug: shared usb dt document is incorrect

2015-07-28 Thread Rob Herring
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:12 PM, Peter Chen wrote: > >> > I was just doing some testing with USB on a Qualcomm SoC. >> > >> > I followed the instructions in the binding document: >> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci-hdrc-usb2.txt >> > >> > which has a compatible for "qcom,ci-hdrc", and

Re: [PATCH] input: twl4030-vibra: Fix ERROR: Bad of_node_put() warning

2015-07-28 Thread Rob Herring
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Belisko Marek wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:53 PM, Dmitry Torokhov > wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:38:34PM +0200, Marek Belisko wrote: >>> Fix following: >>> [8.862274] ERROR: Bad of_node_put() on /ocp/i2c@4807/twl@48/audio >>>

RE: Bug: shared usb dt document is incorrect

2015-07-28 Thread Peter Chen
> > I was just doing some testing with USB on a Qualcomm SoC. > > > > I followed the instructions in the binding document: > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci-hdrc-usb2.txt > > > > which has a compatible for "qcom,ci-hdrc", and is, in general, for > > chipidea-based USB controllers. > >

Re: [PATCH] arch/*/io.h: Add ioremap_uc() to all architectures

2015-07-28 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Luis, On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 11:22:07 -0700 "Luis R. Rodriguez" wrote: > > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" > > This adds ioremap_uc() only for architectures that do not > include asm-generic.h/io.h as that already provides a default > definition for them for both cases where you have CONFIG_MMU >

Re: [PATCH 4/6] pci: altera: Add Altera PCIe MSI driver

2015-07-28 Thread Ley Foon Tan
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Ley Foon Tan wrote: >> This patch adds Altera PCIe MSI driver. This soft IP supports configurable >> number of vectors, which is a dts parameter. >> @@ -154,4 +154,11 @@ config PCIE_ALTERA >> Say Y

Re: [PATCH 3/6] pci:host: Add Altera PCIe host controller driver

2015-07-28 Thread Ley Foon Tan
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Ley Foon Tan wrote: >> This patch adds the Altera PCIe host controller driver. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan >> --- >> drivers/pci/host/Kconfig | 9 + >> drivers/pci/host/Makefile | 1 +

Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm: mach-socfpga: enable pci support

2015-07-28 Thread Ley Foon Tan
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Ley Foon Tan wrote: >> Enable CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORT_MSI and CONFIG_PCI in SOCFPGA platform. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan >> --- >> arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config option

2015-07-28 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 07/28/2015 08:47 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: On 29/07/2015 01:21, Andy Lutomirski wrote: On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: On 07/28/2015 01:07 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote: I suspect that the set_ldt(NULL, 0) call

Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] Add MediaTek display PWM driver

2015-07-28 Thread YH Huang
On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 17:10 +0800, YH Huang wrote: > On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 10:42 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > On Monday, July 20, 2015 04:17:14 PM YH Huang wrote: > > > This patch series add the use of display PWM driver, documentation > > > and device tree for Mediatek SoCs. The driver is

Re: Bug: shared usb dt document is incorrect

2015-07-28 Thread Rob Herring
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 8:06 PM, Tim Bird wrote: > Antoine and Rob, > > I was just doing some testing with USB on a Qualcomm SoC. > > I followed the instructions in the binding document: > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci-hdrc-usb2.txt > > which has a compatible for "qcom,ci-hdrc", and

linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with the pm tree

2015-07-28 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Lee, Today's linux-next merge of the mfd tree got a conflict in: drivers/acpi/scan.c between commit: 68c6b148daa6 ("ACPI / scan: Move device matching code to bus.c") from the pm tree and commit: 712e960f0ee9 ("ACPI / PM: Attach ACPI power domain only once") from the mfd tree. I

Re: Possible regression due to "tick: broadcast: Prevent livelock from event handler"

2015-07-28 Thread Simon Horman
Hi Thomas, On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 04:53:49PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 3 Jul 2015, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > So this is a single core machine and uses the em_sti timer w/o the > > > broadcast nonsense. In Simons case it looks like em_sti is used as > > > broadcast device. > > > >

Re: Next round: revised futex(2) man page for review

2015-07-28 Thread Davidlohr Bueso
On Tue, 2015-07-28 at 22:45 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Also, this code seems to use plist, which means it won't do the right > thing for SCHED_DEADLINE either. Ick, I don't look forward to seeing nice futex plists converted into rbtrees. As opposed to, eg. rtmutexes, there are a few caveats:

RE: [PATCH net v2 2/2] r8152: reset device when tx timeout

2015-07-28 Thread Hayes Wang
Oliver Neukum [mailto:oneu...@suse.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 8:59 PM [...] > > > > static void rtl8152_tx_timeout(struct net_device *netdev) { > > > > struct r8152 *tp = netdev_priv(netdev); > > > > - int i; > > > > > > > > netif_warn(tp, tx_err, netdev, "Tx

RE: [PATCH 3/5] Add calls to translate Always Running Timer (ART) to system time

2015-07-28 Thread Hall, Christopher S
> -Original Message- > From: John Stultz [mailto:john.stu...@linaro.org] > Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 9:11 PM > To: Hall, Christopher S > Cc: Thomas Gleixner; Richard Cochran; Ingo Molnar; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; > Ronciak, John; H. Peter Anvin; x...@kernel.org; lkml; >

Re: [PATCH] virtio_mmio: add ACPI probing

2015-07-28 Thread Shannon Zhao
On 2015/7/29 5:10, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 28 July 2015 at 21:28, G Gregory wrote: >> > On 28 July 2015 at 21:12, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> >> Mmm. I'm not terribly happy about stuff being in QEMU before the >>> >> ACPI spec for it has been finalised. We should not be picking >>> >> stuff

RE: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: watchdog: at91sam9_wdt: add new feature support

2015-07-28 Thread Yang, Wenyou
Hi Guenter, Thank you for your prompt answer. > -Original Message- > From: Guenter Roeck [mailto:li...@roeck-us.net] > Sent: 2015年7月29日 9:23 > To: Yang, Wenyou; w...@iguana.be; robh...@kernel.org; pawel.m...@arm.com; > mark.rutl...@arm.com; ijc+devicet...@hellion.org.uk;

Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] mtd: nand: Qualcomm NAND controller driver

2015-07-28 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 07/27/2015 09:34 PM, Archit Taneja wrote: Hi, On 07/25/2015 06:21 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: On 07/21/2015 03:34 AM, Archit Taneja wrote: + int size) +{ +struct desc_info *desc; +struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *dma_desc; +struct scatterlist *sgl; +int r; + +

Re: [PATCH 3/5] Add calls to translate Always Running Timer (ART) to system time

2015-07-28 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Hall, Christopher S wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Andy Lutomirski [mailto:l...@kernel.org] >> Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 6:32 PM >> To: Hall, Christopher S; john.stu...@linaro.org; t...@linutronix.de; >> richardcoch...@gmail.com;

RE: [PATCH 1/5] Add functions producing system time given a backing counter value

2015-07-28 Thread Hall, Christopher S
> -Original Message- > From: John Stultz [mailto:john.stu...@linaro.org] > Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 8:44 PM > To: Hall, Christopher S > Cc: Thomas Gleixner; Richard Cochran; Ingo Molnar; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; > Ronciak, John; H. Peter Anvin; x...@kernel.org; lkml; >

RE: [PATCH 00/22] ACPICA: 20150717 Release

2015-07-28 Thread Zheng, Lv
Hi, Rafael You may also need this patch: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6879621/ Which fixes a problem in this release. Sorry for noticing this late. Thanks and best regards -Lv > From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:r...@rjwysocki.net] > Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 8:58 AM > > On Thursday,

[PATCH 1/2] drm/panel: Add Sharp LS043T1LE01 panel binding documentation

2015-07-28 Thread Bjorn Andersson
From: Werner Johansson Signed-off-by: Werner Johansson Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson --- .../bindings/panel/sharp,ls043t1le01.txt | 22 ++ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/panel/sharp,ls043t1le01.txt diff

[PATCH 2/2] drm/panel: Add Sharp LS043T1LE01 MIPI DSI panel

2015-07-28 Thread Bjorn Andersson
From: Werner Johansson This adds support for the Sharp panel found on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 Dragonboard (APQ8074) Signed-off-by: Werner Johansson Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson --- drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig | 9 + drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile

Re: Bug: shared usb dt document is incorrect

2015-07-28 Thread Peter Chen
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 06:06:30PM -0700, Tim Bird wrote: > Antoine and Rob, > > I was just doing some testing with USB on a Qualcomm SoC. > > I followed the instructions in the binding document: > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci-hdrc-usb2.txt > > which has a compatible for

RE: [PATCH 3/9] x86/intel_rdt: Cache Allocation documentation and cgroup usage guide

2015-07-28 Thread Auld, Will
> -Original Message- > From: Shivappa, Vikas > Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 5:07 PM > To: Marcelo Tosatti > Cc: Vikas Shivappa; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Shivappa, Vikas; > x...@kernel.org; h...@zytor.com; t...@linutronix.de; mi...@kernel.org; > t...@kernel.org; pet...@infradead.org;

Re: [PATCH] of: Add vendor prefix for Sharp Microelectronics

2015-07-28 Thread Bjorn Andersson
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 7:01 AM, Thierry Reding > wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 01:54:09PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 03:50:44PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: >>> > From: Thierry Reding >>> > >>> > Use

Re: X-Gene: Unhandled fault: synchronous external abort in pci_generic_config_read32

2015-07-28 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 02:50:39PM -0700, Duc Dang wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:45:26AM -0700, Duc Dang wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > >> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Duc Dang wrote: > >>

Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: watchdog: at91sam9_wdt: add new feature support

2015-07-28 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 07/28/2015 05:38 PM, Yang, Wenyou wrote: Hi Guenter, Thank you very much for your review. -Original Message- From: Guenter Roeck [mailto:li...@roeck-us.net] Sent: 2015年7月28日 15:14 To: Yang, Wenyou; w...@iguana.be; robh...@kernel.org; pawel.m...@arm.com; mark.rutl...@arm.com;

Re: [PATCH 02/10] cgroup: introduce cgroup_subsys->legacy_name

2015-07-28 Thread Zefan Li
On 2015/7/25 2:43, Tejun Heo wrote: > This allows cgroup subsystems to use a different name on the unified > hierarchy. cgroup_subsys->name is used on the unified hierarchy, > ->legacy_name elsewhere. If ->legacy_name is not explicitly set, it's > automatically set to ->name and the userland

RE: [PATCH 3/5] Add calls to translate Always Running Timer (ART) to system time

2015-07-28 Thread Hall, Christopher S
> -Original Message- > From: Andy Lutomirski [mailto:l...@kernel.org] > Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 6:32 PM > To: Hall, Christopher S; john.stu...@linaro.org; t...@linutronix.de; > richardcoch...@gmail.com; mi...@redhat.com; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Ronciak, > John; h...@zytor.com;

Re: [PATCH 01/10] cgroup: don't print subsystems for the default hierarchy

2015-07-28 Thread Zefan Li
On 2015/7/25 2:43, Tejun Heo wrote: > It doesn't make sense to print subsystems on mount option or > /proc/PID/cgroup for the default hierarchy. > > * cgroup.controllers file at the root of the default hierarchy lists > the currently attached controllers. > > * The default hierarchy is

Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: Avoid attempts to create duplicate symbolic links

2015-07-28 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, July 27, 2015 08:09:35 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 27-07-15, 15:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Say the subsys add callback runs for a CPU and it doesn't have a policy. > > If it is offline, we ignore it and the add callback won't be executed > > for it again. > > > > In turn, if it

Bug: shared usb dt document is incorrect

2015-07-28 Thread Tim Bird
Antoine and Rob, I was just doing some testing with USB on a Qualcomm SoC. I followed the instructions in the binding document: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ci-hdrc-usb2.txt which has a compatible for "qcom,ci-hdrc", and is, in general, for chipidea-based USB controllers. It says in

[PATCH v2] watchdog: Move NMI function header declarations from watchdog.h to nmi.h

2015-07-28 Thread Guenter Roeck
The kernel's NMI watchdog has nothing to do with the watchdog subsystem. Its header declarations are in linux/nmi.h, not in linux/watchdog.h. The code provided two sets of dummy functions if HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR is not configured, one in the include file and one in kernel/watchdog.c. Remove the

Re: [PATCH V7 4/5] arm64: apei: implement arch_apei_get_mem_attributes()

2015-07-28 Thread Zhang, Jonathan Zhixiong
On 7/27/2015 2:54 AM, Matt Fleming wrote: On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 10:45 +0100, Will Deacon wrote: That bit's fine. The weird bit is: pgprot_t prot; prot = efi_mem_attributes(addr); Since that's putting the arch-independent format into the pg_prot. Oops, missed that. Yeah that's funky.

RE: [PATCH v3] ARM: dts: Add SPI CS on exynos5250-snow

2015-07-28 Thread Kukjin Kim
Michal Suchanek wrote: > > Although there is only one choice of chipselect it is necessary to > specify it. The driver cannot claim the gpio otherwise. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek > Acked-by: Javier Martinez Canillas > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > >From here

[GIT PULL] target fixes for v4.2-rc5

2015-07-28 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
Hi Linus, Here are the outstanding target-pending fixes for v4.2-rc5 code. Please go ahead and pull from: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nab/target-pending.git master This series is larger than what I'd normally be conformable with sending for a -rc5 PULL request.. However,

Re: hugetlb pages not accounted for in rss

2015-07-28 Thread Jörn Engel
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 04:30:19PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > > It's not only the oom killer, I don't believe hugeltb pages are accounted > to the "rss" in memcg. They use the hugetlb_cgroup for that. Starting to > account for them in existing memcg deployments would cause them to hit >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config option

2015-07-28 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 29/07/2015 01:21, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Boris Ostrovsky > wrote: >> On 07/28/2015 01:07 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Andrew Cooper >>> wrote: I suspect that the set_ldt(NULL, 0) call hasn't reached Xen before

[PATCH] cpufreq: Replace recover_policy with new_policy in cpufreq_online()

2015-07-28 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
From: Rafael J. Wysocki The recover_policy is unsed in cpufreq_online() to indicate whether a new policy object is created or an existing one is reinitialized. The "recover" part of the name is slightly confusing (it should be "reinitialization" rather than "recovery") and the logical not (!)

RE: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: watchdog: at91sam9_wdt: add new feature support

2015-07-28 Thread Yang, Wenyou
Hi Guenter, Thank you very much for your review. > -Original Message- > From: Guenter Roeck [mailto:li...@roeck-us.net] > Sent: 2015年7月28日 15:14 > To: Yang, Wenyou; w...@iguana.be; robh...@kernel.org; pawel.m...@arm.com; > mark.rutl...@arm.com; ijc+devicet...@hellion.org.uk;

[Update 2x][PATCH 7/7] cpufreq: Separate CPU device registration from CPU online

2015-07-28 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
From: Rafael J. Wysocki To separate the CPU online interface from the CPU device registration, split cpufreq_online() out of cpufreq_add_dev() and make cpufreq_cpu_callback() call the former, while cpufreq_add_dev() itself will only be used as the CPU device addition subsystem interface

Re: [RFC 1/4] mm, compaction: introduce kcompactd

2015-07-28 Thread David Rientjes
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > Two issues I want to bring up: > > > > (1) do non-thp configs benefit from periodic compaction? > > > > In my experience, no, but perhaps there are other use cases where > > this has been a pain. The primary candidates, in my

Re: [PATCH 00/22] ACPICA: 20150717 Release

2015-07-28 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, July 23, 2015 12:51:58 PM Lv Zheng wrote: > The 20150717 ACPICA kernel-resident subsystem updates are linuxized based > on the linux-pm/linux-next branch. > > The patchset has passed the following build/boot tests. > Build tests are performed as follows: > 1. i386 + default +

Re: [PATCH V8 4/5] arm64: apei: implement arch_apei_get_mem_attributes()

2015-07-28 Thread Zhang, Jonathan Zhixiong
On 7/27/2015 3:03 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 12:51:08AM +0100, Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang wrote: From: "Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang" Table 8 of UEFI 2.5 section 2.3.6.1 defines mappings from EFI memory types to MAIR attribute encodings for arm64. If the physical address

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config option

2015-07-28 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > On 07/28/2015 01:07 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Andrew Cooper >> wrote: >>> >>> I suspect that the set_ldt(NULL, 0) call hasn't reached Xen before >>> xen_free_ldt() is attempting to nab back the

Re: [PATCH V8 3/5] arm64: mm: add PROT_DEVICE_nGnRnE and PROT_NORMAL_WT

2015-07-28 Thread Zhang, Jonathan Zhixiong
On 7/27/2015 2:19 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 12:51:07AM +0100, Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang wrote: From: "Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang" UEFI spec 2.5 section 2.3.6.1 defines that EFI_MEMORY_[UC|WC|WT|WB] are possible EFI memory types for AArch64. Each of those EFI memory

Re: [PATCH] x86/mm, efi: Check for valid image type

2015-07-28 Thread josh
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 09:51:57PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote: > (Pulling in Josh) Thanks, Matt. > On Wed, 22 Jul, at 05:32:44PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > I usually see > > |Ignoring BGRT: failed to allocate memory for image (wanted 264301314 bytes) > > |Ignoring BGRT: failed to

Re: [PATCH v2 0/22] On-demand device probing

2015-07-28 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 03:19:31 PM Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > Hello, > > I have a problem with the panel on my Tegra Chromebook taking longer > than expected to be ready during boot (Stéphane Marchesin reported what > is basically the same issue in [0]), and have looked into ordered > probing as a

Re: [PATCH 3/9] x86/intel_rdt: Cache Allocation documentation and cgroup usage guide

2015-07-28 Thread Vikas Shivappa
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 03:21:04PM -0700, Vikas Shivappa wrote: Adds a description of Cache allocation technology, overview of kernel implementation and usage of Cache Allocation cgroup interface. Cache allocation is a sub-feature of Resource

Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] mfd: introduce a driver for LPSS devices on SPT

2015-07-28 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 09:59:30 AM Lee Jones wrote: > Enjoy, > > The following changes since commit bc0195aad0daa2ad5b0d76cce22b167bc3435590: > > Linux 4.2-rc2 (2015-07-12 15:10:30 -0700) > > are available in the git repository at: > >

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Correct a freq check in cpufreq_set_policy

2015-07-28 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 11:34:21 AM Pan Xinhui wrote: > From: Pan Xinhui > > This check was originally added by commit 9c9a43ed2734 ("[CPUFREQ] > return error when failing to set minfreq").It attempt to return an error > on obviously incorrect limits when we echo xxx >.../scaling_max,min_freq

Re: [PATCH 7/7] x86/intel_rdt: Add CAT documentation and usage guide

2015-07-28 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:27:32AM -0700, Vikas Shivappa wrote: > > > On Thu, 26 Mar 2015, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > >I can't find any discussion relating to exposing the CBM interface > >directly to userspace in that thread ? > > > >Cpu.shares is written in ratio form, which is much more

Re: [PATCH 3/9] x86/intel_rdt: Cache Allocation documentation and cgroup usage guide

2015-07-28 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 03:21:04PM -0700, Vikas Shivappa wrote: > Adds a description of Cache allocation technology, overview > of kernel implementation and usage of Cache Allocation cgroup interface. > > Cache allocation is a sub-feature of Resource Director Technology(RDT) > Allocation or

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Add scaling frequency range support

2015-07-28 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 12:53:33 PM Pan Xinhui wrote: > hi, Viresh > thanks for your reply :) > On 2015年07月28日 12:29, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 28-07-15, 11:32, Pan Xinhui wrote: > >> From: Pan Xinhui > >> > >> Userspace at most time do cpufreq tests very much inconveniently. > >>

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Add scaling frequency range support

2015-07-28 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, July 28, 2015 11:32:19 AM Pan Xinhui wrote: > From: Pan Xinhui > > Userspace at most time do cpufreq tests very much inconveniently. > Currently they have to echo min and max cpu freq separately like below: > echo 48 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_min_freq > echo

Please Kindly Assist

2015-07-28 Thread Mrs Zhang
Please i need your assistance on a pressing matter, please kindly reply back on receipt of this message so i can give you more details. Thanks i hope to read from you soon Regards Mrs Zhang Guihua -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >