Add back function that was dropped when reworking the SCM code.
Signed-off-by: Andy Gross
---
drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
index 84330c5..89c3775 100644
Add back function that was dropped when reworking the SCM code.
Signed-off-by: Andy Gross
---
drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
index 84330c5..89c3775 100644
---
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 04:08:20PM -0400, Jon Mason wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:35:28AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> >> On 06/29/2016 07:13
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 04:08:20PM -0400, Jon Mason wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:35:28AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> >> On 06/29/2016 07:13 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> >> >
Hi, Yinghai,
Yinghai Lu writes:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Ye Xiaolong wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:59:37AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
output is:
Hi, Yinghai,
Yinghai Lu writes:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Ye Xiaolong wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:59:37AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
output is:
early console in setup code
early console in extract_kernel
This comment with a mysterious unfinished line confuses the kernel-doc
system since, because it starts with /**, it thinks it is documenting a
function.
Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt
---
fs/befs/linuxvfs.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git
This comment with a mysterious unfinished line confuses the kernel-doc
system since, because it starts with /**, it thinks it is documenting a
function.
Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt
---
fs/befs/linuxvfs.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/befs/linuxvfs.c
Log error only when silent flag is not set.
Fixes: dbe6460388bc ("fs/befs/linuxvfs.c: check silent flag before logging
errors")
Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt
---
Hi,
Reading the backlog of latest patches to befs, I noticed that Salah's patch
missed one call to
Log error only when silent flag is not set.
Fixes: dbe6460388bc ("fs/befs/linuxvfs.c: check silent flag before logging
errors")
Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt
---
Hi,
Reading the backlog of latest patches to befs, I noticed that Salah's patch
missed one call to befs_error() when setting
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 04:08:20PM -0400, Jon Mason wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:35:28AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >> On 06/29/2016 07:13 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >> > Hi Jon
> >> >
> >> > I know you are just
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 04:08:20PM -0400, Jon Mason wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:35:28AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >> On 06/29/2016 07:13 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >> > Hi Jon
> >> >
> >> > I know you are just refactoring code,
If the master device has callbacks for _get/put_device()
and this MTD has slaves a get_mtd_device() call on paritions
will never issue the registered callbacks.
Fix this by propergating _get/put_device() down.
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger
---
Hi!
I've found this issue while
On June 29, 2016 12:46:35 PM PDT, Greg KH wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 09:05:47PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:35:11AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> > copyleft-next [0] [1] is an openly evolved copyleft license, its an
>> >
If the master device has callbacks for _get/put_device()
and this MTD has slaves a get_mtd_device() call on paritions
will never issue the registered callbacks.
Fix this by propergating _get/put_device() down.
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger
---
Hi!
I've found this issue while heavily
On June 29, 2016 12:46:35 PM PDT, Greg KH wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 09:05:47PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:35:11AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> > copyleft-next [0] [1] is an openly evolved copyleft license, its an
>> > effort to evolve copyleft
vbin_printf() and bstr_printf() are used by trace_printk(), when it is
possible to optimize to copying the binary arguments into the ring buffer
and doing the final conversions at the time of reading the ring buffer.
This is advantageous as it removes computer processing from the executing
of
vbin_printf() and bstr_printf() are used by trace_printk(), when it is
possible to optimize to copying the binary arguments into the ring buffer
and doing the final conversions at the time of reading the ring buffer.
This is advantageous as it removes computer processing from the executing
of
From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
vbin_printf() is used in conjunction with bstr_printf() to record some
printf() statment and to show it later. It is currently used exclusively
with trace_printk() which records the binary format into the trace ring
buffer and formats the
From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
printk() allows a %pb to print out cpumasks. As it uses a pointer to
reference the mask it can be problematic for vbin_printf() to use, as the
referencing is done at a later time (via bstr_printf()). Instead of saving
the pointer to the
From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
vbin_printf() is used in conjunction with bstr_printf() to record some
printf() statment and to show it later. It is currently used exclusively
with trace_printk() which records the binary format into the trace ring
buffer and formats the output at a later time
From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
printk() allows a %pb to print out cpumasks. As it uses a pointer to
reference the mask it can be problematic for vbin_printf() to use, as the
referencing is done at a later time (via bstr_printf()). Instead of saving
the pointer to the cpumask, simply save the
From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
Some architectures require a dereference of function pointers (See powerpc).
The dereferenced poiner must be saved into the buffer in vbin_printf() to be
safe to access it later.
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker
Cc: Jiri Olsa
From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
Some architectures require a dereference of function pointers (See powerpc).
The dereferenced poiner must be saved into the buffer in vbin_printf() to be
safe to access it later.
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker
Cc: Jiri Olsa
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt
---
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-28 at 15:34 -0400, Jon Mason wrote:
>> The bgmac_* print wrappers call dev_* prints with the dev pointer from
>> the bcma core. In anticipation of removing the bcma requirement for
>> this driver, these must
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-28 at 15:34 -0400, Jon Mason wrote:
>> The bgmac_* print wrappers call dev_* prints with the dev pointer from
>> the bcma core. In anticipation of removing the bcma requirement for
>> this driver, these must be changed to not
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Ye Xiaolong wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:59:37AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>output is:
>>>
>>>early console in setup code
>>>early console in extract_kernel
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Ye Xiaolong wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:59:37AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>output is:
>>>
>>>early console in setup code
>>>early console in extract_kernel
>>>input_data: 0x08fbb276
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:35:28AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 06/29/2016 07:13 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> > Hi Jon
>> >
>> > I know you are just refactoring code, but at some point it would be
>> > good to take a
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:35:28AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 06/29/2016 07:13 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> > Hi Jon
>> >
>> > I know you are just refactoring code, but at some point it would be
>> > good to take a closer look at this
From: Huang Ying
ACPI/APEI is designed to verifiy/report H/W errors, like Corrected
Error(CE) and Uncorrected Error(UC). It contains four tables: HEST,
ERST, EINJ and BERT. The first three tables have been merged for
a long time, but because of lacking BIOS support for
From: Huang Ying
ACPI/APEI is designed to verifiy/report H/W errors, like Corrected
Error(CE) and Uncorrected Error(UC). It contains four tables: HEST,
ERST, EINJ and BERT. The first three tables have been merged for
a long time, but because of lacking BIOS support for BERT, the
support for BERT
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:46:35PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 09:05:47PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:35:11AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > copyleft-next [0] [1] is an openly evolved copyleft license, its an
> > > effort to evolve
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:46:35PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 09:05:47PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:35:11AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > copyleft-next [0] [1] is an openly evolved copyleft license, its an
> > > effort to evolve
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 13:47:23 -0600
Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:09:46 +0800
> Yongji Xie wrote:
>
> > Hi, Alex
> >
> > On 2016/6/25 0:43, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 23:37:02 +0800
> > >
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 13:47:23 -0600
Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:09:46 +0800
> Yongji Xie wrote:
>
> > Hi, Alex
> >
> > On 2016/6/25 0:43, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 23:37:02 +0800
> > > Yongji Xie wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi, Alex
> > >>
> > >>
From: Dave Hansen
Every time we add a word to our cpu features, we need to add
something like this in two places:
(((bit)>>5)==16 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & REQUIRED_MASK16))
The trick is getting the "16" in this case in both places. I've
now screwed this up
From: Dave Hansen
We had a new CPUID "NCAPINT" word added, but the REQUIRED_MASK and
DISABLED_MASK macros did not get updated. Update them.
None of the features was needed in these masks, so there was no
harm, but we should keep them updated anyway.
From: Dave Hansen
Every time we add a word to our cpu features, we need to add
something like this in two places:
(((bit)>>5)==16 && (1UL<<((bit)&31) & REQUIRED_MASK16))
The trick is getting the "16" in this case in both places. I've
now screwed this up twice, so as pennance, I've
From: Dave Hansen
We had a new CPUID "NCAPINT" word added, but the REQUIRED_MASK and
DISABLED_MASK macros did not get updated. Update them.
None of the features was needed in these masks, so there was no
harm, but we should keep them updated anyway.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen
---
From: Dave Hansen
x86 has two macros which allow us to evaluate some CPUID-based
features at compile time:
REQUIRED_MASK_BIT_SET()
DISABLED_MASK_BIT_SET()
They're both defined by having the compiler check the bit
argument against some constant
From: Dave Hansen
x86 has two macros which allow us to evaluate some CPUID-based
features at compile time:
REQUIRED_MASK_BIT_SET()
DISABLED_MASK_BIT_SET()
They're both defined by having the compiler check the bit
argument against some constant masks of features.
But, when
On 29 June 2016 at 21:54, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> This is the latest patchset needed to get brcmfmac working reasonably well
> with BCM4366.
>
> Both patches were already sent as V2 RFC (10 days ago), there were no more
> comments since then and this is the same code as in V2
On 29 June 2016 at 21:54, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> This is the latest patchset needed to get brcmfmac working reasonably well
> with BCM4366.
>
> Both patches were already sent as V2 RFC (10 days ago), there were no more
> comments since then and this is the same code as in V2 RFC. I was mostly
>
So far when receiving event about in-firmware-interface removal our
event worker was notifying listener and afterwards it was removing Linux
interface.
First of all it was resulting in slightly unexpected order. The listener
(del_virtual_intf callback) was (usually) returning with success before
So far when receiving event about in-firmware-interface removal our
event worker was notifying listener and afterwards it was removing Linux
interface.
First of all it was resulting in slightly unexpected order. The listener
(del_virtual_intf callback) was (usually) returning with success before
New firmwares (e.g. 10.10.69.36 for BCM4366) support "interface_remove"
for removing interfaces. Try to use this method on cfg80211 request. In
case of older firmwares (e.g. 7.35.177.56 for BCM43602 as I tested) this
will just result in firmware rejecting command and this won't change any
New firmwares (e.g. 10.10.69.36 for BCM4366) support "interface_remove"
for removing interfaces. Try to use this method on cfg80211 request. In
case of older firmwares (e.g. 7.35.177.56 for BCM43602 as I tested) this
will just result in firmware rejecting command and this won't change any
On 06/16/2016 03:40 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The driver doesn't set the struct v4l2_capability bus_info field so the
> v4l2-compliance tool reports the following errors for VIDIOC_QUERYCAP:
>
> Required ioctls:
> VIDIOC_QUERYCAP returned 0 (Success)
>
On 06/16/2016 03:40 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The driver doesn't set the struct v4l2_capability bus_info field so the
> v4l2-compliance tool reports the following errors for VIDIOC_QUERYCAP:
>
> Required ioctls:
> VIDIOC_QUERYCAP returned 0 (Success)
>
Hi all,
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 03:55:04PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Currently, the compat /proc/cpuinfo is provided only if a task has the
> PER_LINUX32 personality, either by setting it explicitly or by
> inheriting it from the parent task. This is in line with the "uname -m"
> behaviour.
From: Florian Fainelli
Add an ARCH_BRCMSTB Kconfig symbol which allows us not to update the
dependencies for all STB-related drivers. Select BRCMSTB_L2_IRQ and
GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP which are required for proper functioning.
Signed-off-by: Doug Berger
Hi all,
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 03:55:04PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Currently, the compat /proc/cpuinfo is provided only if a task has the
> PER_LINUX32 personality, either by setting it explicitly or by
> inheriting it from the parent task. This is in line with the "uname -m"
> behaviour.
From: Florian Fainelli
Add an ARCH_BRCMSTB Kconfig symbol which allows us not to update the
dependencies for all STB-related drivers. Select BRCMSTB_L2_IRQ and
GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP which are required for proper functioning.
Signed-off-by: Doug Berger
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli
Signed-off-by:
On 06/28/16 at 07:18pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 28 Juni 2016, 15:20:55 schrieb Dave Young:
> > On 06/27/16 at 04:21pm, Dave Young wrote:
> > > Please ignore previous reply, I mistakenly send a broken mail without
> > > subject, sorry about it. Resend the reply here.
> > >
> >
On 06/28/16 at 07:18pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 28 Juni 2016, 15:20:55 schrieb Dave Young:
> > On 06/27/16 at 04:21pm, Dave Young wrote:
> > > Please ignore previous reply, I mistakenly send a broken mail without
> > > subject, sorry about it. Resend the reply here.
> > >
> >
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 7:51 PM, John Youn wrote:
> On 6/21/2016 7:26 PM, Bruno Herrera wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Bruno Herrera
>
> Please add a commit message describing the purpose of your changes,
> some information about the platform you're
On 06/28/16 at 07:18pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 23 Juni 2016, 10:25:06 schrieb Dave Young:
> > On 06/22/16 at 08:30pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch, 22 Juni 2016, 18:20:47 schrieb Dave Young:
> > > > The patch looks good, but could the subject be more
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 7:51 PM, John Youn wrote:
> On 6/21/2016 7:26 PM, Bruno Herrera wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Bruno Herrera
>
> Please add a commit message describing the purpose of your changes,
> some information about the platform you're adding, and the special
> handling of the GGPIO.
>
On 06/28/16 at 07:18pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 23 Juni 2016, 10:25:06 schrieb Dave Young:
> > On 06/22/16 at 08:30pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch, 22 Juni 2016, 18:20:47 schrieb Dave Young:
> > > > The patch looks good, but could the subject be more
On Saturday, June 25, 2016 2:37:24 PM CEST Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> The series is aimed at getting rid of CURRENT_TIME, CURRENT_TIME_SEC macros
> and replacing current_fs_time() with current_time().
> The macros are not y2038 safe. There is no plan to transition them into being
> y2038 safe.
>
On Saturday, June 25, 2016 2:37:24 PM CEST Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> The series is aimed at getting rid of CURRENT_TIME, CURRENT_TIME_SEC macros
> and replacing current_fs_time() with current_time().
> The macros are not y2038 safe. There is no plan to transition them into being
> y2038 safe.
>
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 09:05:47PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:35:11AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > copyleft-next [0] [1] is an openly evolved copyleft license, its an
> > effort to evolve copyleft without participation of the Church (TM)
> > or State (R),
On 06/16/2016 03:40 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> According to the V4L2 documentation the driver and card fields should be
> used to identify the driver and the device but the s5p-mfc driver fills
> those field using the platform device name, which in turn is the name of
> the device DT
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 09:05:47PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:35:11AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > copyleft-next [0] [1] is an openly evolved copyleft license, its an
> > effort to evolve copyleft without participation of the Church (TM)
> > or State (R),
On 06/16/2016 03:40 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> According to the V4L2 documentation the driver and card fields should be
> used to identify the driver and the device but the s5p-mfc driver fills
> those field using the platform device name, which in turn is the name of
> the device DT
On 06/16/2016 03:40 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The driver doesn't set the struct v4l2_capability cap_info field so the
> v4l2-compliance tool reports the following errors for VIDIOC_QUERYCAP:
>
> Required ioctls:
> VIDIOC_QUERYCAP returned 0 (Success)
>
On 06/16/2016 03:40 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The driver fills in both the struct v4l2_capability driver and card fields
> the same values, that is the driver's name plus the information if the dev
> is a decoder or an encoder.
>
> But the driver field has a fixed length of 16 bytes
On 06/16/2016 03:40 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The driver doesn't set the struct v4l2_capability cap_info field so the
> v4l2-compliance tool reports the following errors for VIDIOC_QUERYCAP:
>
> Required ioctls:
> VIDIOC_QUERYCAP returned 0 (Success)
>
On 06/16/2016 03:40 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The driver fills in both the struct v4l2_capability driver and card fields
> the same values, that is the driver's name plus the information if the dev
> is a decoder or an encoder.
>
> But the driver field has a fixed length of 16 bytes
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 05:56:02AM -0700, tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> +static inline u64 rdlbr_from(unsigned int idx)
> +{
> + u64 val;
> +
> + rdmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_from + idx, val);
> +
> + return lbr_from_signext_quirk_rd(val);
> +}
> +
> +static inline u64 rdlbr_to(unsigned
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 05:56:02AM -0700, tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> +static inline u64 rdlbr_from(unsigned int idx)
> +{
> + u64 val;
> +
> + rdmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_from + idx, val);
> +
> + return lbr_from_signext_quirk_rd(val);
> +}
> +
> +static inline u64 rdlbr_to(unsigned
`daqboard2000_find_boardinfo()` is supposed to check if the
DaqBoard/2000 series model is supported, based on the PCI subvendor and
subdevice ID. The current code is wrong as it is comparing the PCI
device's subdevice ID to an expected, fixed value for the subvendor ID.
It should be comparing the
`daqboard2000_find_boardinfo()` is supposed to check if the
DaqBoard/2000 series model is supported, based on the PCI subvendor and
subdevice ID. The current code is wrong as it is comparing the PCI
device's subdevice ID to an expected, fixed value for the subvendor ID.
It should be comparing the
From: Dave Hansen
Len Brown noticed something was amiss in our INTEL_FAM6_*
definitions. It seems like model 0x1F was a Nehalem part,
marketed as "Intel Core i7 and i5 Processors" (according to the
SDM). But, although it was a Nehalem 0x1F had some uncore events
From: Dave Hansen
Len Brown noticed something was amiss in our INTEL_FAM6_*
definitions. It seems like model 0x1F was a Nehalem part,
marketed as "Intel Core i7 and i5 Processors" (according to the
SDM). But, although it was a Nehalem 0x1F had some uncore events
which were shared with
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:03:47AM +0530, Amitoj Kaur Chawla wrote:
> This script detects cases which have incorrect error handling for
> devm_ioremap_resource function, employing a NULL test instead of an
> IS_ERR() test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amitoj Kaur Chawla
Why don't we
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:03:47AM +0530, Amitoj Kaur Chawla wrote:
> This script detects cases which have incorrect error handling for
> devm_ioremap_resource function, employing a NULL test instead of an
> IS_ERR() test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amitoj Kaur Chawla
Why don't we fix the code at the
On 06/29, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> But it seems that further changes I am
> planning in this area will benefit from stable task->mm in this path
Oh, so I hope you will cleanup this later,
> Just pull the task->mm !=
> NULL check inside the function.
OK, but this means it will always return false
On 06/29, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> But it seems that further changes I am
> planning in this area will benefit from stable task->mm in this path
Oh, so I hope you will cleanup this later,
> Just pull the task->mm !=
> NULL check inside the function.
OK, but this means it will always return false
On 06/29/2016 10:39 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
Hey Jens,
Please git pull the 'stable/for-jens-4.7' branch which is based on your
'for-4.7/drivers' branch. It will nicely merge in your 'for-linus' branch:
git pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git
On 06/29/2016 10:39 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
Hey Jens,
Please git pull the 'stable/for-jens-4.7' branch which is based on your
'for-4.7/drivers' branch. It will nicely merge in your 'for-linus' branch:
git pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git
Introduce support for clocks that use a combination of two linear
multipliers (N and K factors), one linear divider (M) and one power of two
divider (P).
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
---
drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/Kconfig| 5 ++
drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/Makefile
Introduce support for clocks that use a combination of two linear
multipliers (N and K factors), one linear divider (M) and one power of two
divider (P).
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
---
drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/Kconfig| 5 ++
drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/Makefile | 1 +
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 23:05:56 +0200
Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28 2016, Emese Revfy wrote:
>
> > The kernel already has a mechanism to free up code and data memory that
> > is only used during kernel or module initialization.
> > This
Some clocks in the Allwinner SoCs clocks unit are just muxes.
However, those muxes might also be found in some other complicated clocks
that would benefit from the code in there to deal with "advanced" features,
like pre-dividers.
Introduce a set of helpers to reduce the code duplication in such
Start our new clock infrastructure by adding the registration code, common
structure and common code.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
---
drivers/clk/Kconfig | 1 +
drivers/clk/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/Kconfig | 3 ++
Introduce support for clocks that multiply and divide using two linear
multipliers and one linear divider.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
---
drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/Kconfig | 5 ++
drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c | 153
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 23:05:56 +0200
Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28 2016, Emese Revfy wrote:
>
> > The kernel already has a mechanism to free up code and data memory that
> > is only used during kernel or module initialization.
> > This plugin will teach the compiler to find more such
Some clocks in the Allwinner SoCs clocks unit are just muxes.
However, those muxes might also be found in some other complicated clocks
that would benefit from the code in there to deal with "advanced" features,
like pre-dividers.
Introduce a set of helpers to reduce the code duplication in such
Start our new clock infrastructure by adding the registration code, common
structure and common code.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
---
drivers/clk/Kconfig | 1 +
drivers/clk/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/Kconfig | 3 ++
drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/Makefile
Introduce support for clocks that multiply and divide using two linear
multipliers and one linear divider.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
---
drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/Kconfig | 5 ++
drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c | 153
setup_new_dl_entity() takes two parameters, but it only actually uses
one of them, under a different name, to setup a new dl_entity, after:
2f9f3fdc928 "sched/deadline: Remove dl_new from struct sched_dl_entity"
as we currently do
setup_new_dl_entity(>dl, >dl)
However, before Luca's change
Add support for the clocks in the CCU that introduce a phase shift from
their parent clock.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
---
drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/Kconfig | 3 +
drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/Makefile| 1 +
drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_phase.c | 126
Introduce a new binding with its documentation for the brand new clock
sub-framework.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
---
.../devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi-ccu.txt| 24 ++
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
Hi,
This is the third attempt at introducing clock support for the
Allwinner SoCs following the current model used by pretty much all the
other SoCs.
Such a conversion has been suggested on a regular basis by Mike and
Stephen, and here is a first implementation.
This new approach has a good
Some clocks in the Allwinner SoCs clocks unit are just simple gates. Add
support for those clocks.
Since it's a feature that can also be found in more complex clocks, provide
a bunch of helpers that can be reused later on.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
---
Some clocks can be switched to a mode called fractional that have two fixed
output rate you can choose from.
Add a small library to deal with those clocks.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
---
drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/Kconfig| 9
setup_new_dl_entity() takes two parameters, but it only actually uses
one of them, under a different name, to setup a new dl_entity, after:
2f9f3fdc928 "sched/deadline: Remove dl_new from struct sched_dl_entity"
as we currently do
setup_new_dl_entity(>dl, >dl)
However, before Luca's change
Add support for the clocks in the CCU that introduce a phase shift from
their parent clock.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
---
drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/Kconfig | 3 +
drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/Makefile| 1 +
drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_phase.c | 126 +++
401 - 500 of 1678 matches
Mail list logo