t; drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.c:567:30: warning: variable ‘tinfo’
> set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> 567 | struct ahc_initiator_tinfo *tinfo;
> | ^
>
> Cc: Hannes Reinecke
> Cc: "Daniel M. Eischen"
> Cc: Doug Ledford
FWIW, I can't seem
On Mon, 2019-10-21 at 23:51 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:09 PM Doug Ledford
> wrote:
> > This fix looks reasonable, but since I can't test this at all, and
> > I'm
> > personally tired of trying and failing to fix this issue, I need to
> &g
quot;RDMA/hns: Split hw v1 driver from hns roce
> driver")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann
This fix looks reasonable, but since I can't test this at all, and I'm
personally tired of trying and failing to fix this issue, I need to ask
if you've tried all the permutations for this just
otnuri to fix his stuff. As for the rdma tree, the 10
digit hash is still unique as of today, so I won't rebase the official
branch to fix this. However, I'll see about adding a check for this in
my workflow. Thanks.
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Fingerprint
On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 21:52 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 9:30 PM Doug Ledford
> wrote:
> > Because there are literally thousands of developers working on
> > kernel
> > bits here and there, and you're swatting this particular fly one
> &g
On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 12:41 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 12:29 PM Doug Ledford
> wrote:
> > Because there are literally thousands of developers working on
> > kernel
> > bits here and there, and you're swatting this particular fly one
> >
llionth time, and that takes longer and is more aggravating than the
> conflict would have taken to just sort out.
>
>Linus
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
to 531a64e4c35bb9844b0cf813a6c9a87e00be05ff:
RDMA/siw: Fix IPv6 addr_list locking (2019-08-28 10:29:19 -0400)
Pull request for 5.3-rc6
- Fix locking on list traversal (siw)
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford
Hi Linus,
I didn't notice I was on my personal email identity when I sent the pull
request. Sorry about that. It's really me ;-)
On Fri, 2019-08-23 at 14:48 -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> No beating around the bush: this is a monster pull request for an -rc5
> kernel
> to free 'data' before returning the error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wenwen Wang
Applied to for-rc, thanks.
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
d-off-by: Wenwen Wang
Applied to for-rc, thanks.
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
; 'tun_qp->tx_ring' whenever an error occurs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wenwen Wang
> ---
Thanks, applied to for-rc.
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 2019-08-16 at 14:39 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This line was indented a bit too far.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
Thanks, applied to for-next.
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
sign
ror code on error (core)
- Allow siw to be built on 32bit arches (siw, ABI change, but OK since
siw was just merged this merge window and there is no prior released
kernel to maintain compatibility with and we also updated the
rdma-core user space package to match)
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledf
On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 11:22 +0800, YueHaibing wrote:
> Since commit a07fc0bb483e ("RDMA/hns: Fix build error")
> these kconfig comment is obsolete, so just remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing
Thanks, applied to for-next.
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E
On Fri, 2019-08-02 at 18:32 +, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-08-02 at 11:09 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-11-06 at 16:34 -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2018-11-01 at 09:34 +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at
+-
drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c| 27 +++-
drivers/infiniband/hw/qedr/main.c | 10 ++-
drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp.c | 6 +-
include/rdma/ib_verbs.h| 4 +-
13 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID
l.org
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
> ---
Thanks, applied to for-rc.
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
gt; > Reported-by: Hulk Robot
> > Signed-off-by: YueHaibing
> > ---
> > drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c | 2 --
> > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >
>
> I'm hitting this error too.
>
> Thanks,
> Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky
Applied to fo
On Wed, 2019-07-31 at 14:52 -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-07-31 at 12:52 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > This is insufficient. The speculation windows are large:
> >
> > "Speculative execution on modern CPUs can run several
> > h
df
Thanks, I'll take a look at that. That issue aside, returning without
wasting time on two mutexes is still better IMO, so I like my patch more
than the proposed one. Tony, would you like to resubmit?
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 26
; > ---
> > drivers/infiniband/core/netlink.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
>
> Thanks,
> Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky
Thanks, applied to for-next.
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 12
... }
> ...
> -dev_err(...);
> )
> ...
> }
> //
>
> While we're here, remove braces on if statements that only have one
> statement (manually).
>
> Cc: Doug Ledford
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe
> Cc: linux-r...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman
>
return -EINVAL;
mutex_lock(>port->file_mutex);
mutex_lock(>mutex);
- if (id >= IB_UMAD_MAX_AGENTS || !__get_agent(file, id)) {
+ /*
+* Is our check of id far enough away, code wise, to prevent
+* speculative prefetch?
+*/
+ id = arra
On Mon, 2019-07-29 at 16:03 -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 02:19:35PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > On Fri, 2019-07-26 at 11:25 +0200, Anders Roxell wrote:
> > > The variable 'p' si no longer used and the compiler rightly
> > > complains
>
it subject does not exist in Linus' tree as
of today. What tree is this being merged through, and is it slated to
merge soon or is this a for-next item?
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ep->com.cm_id->rem_ref(ep->com.cm_id);
> + if (ep->com.cm_id)
> + ep->com.cm_id->rem_ref(ep->com.cm_id);
> ep->com.cm_id = NULL;
> ep->com.qp = NULL;
> }
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
lize the PCI device for hip08
> > RoCE")
> > Fixes: 08805fdbeb2d ("RDMA/hns: Split hw v1 driver from hns roce
> > driver")
> > Signed-off-by: YueHaibing
> > drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/Kconfig | 6 +++---
> > drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/Makefile | 8 ++
+
drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/verbs.h | 1 +
drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/verbs_txreq.c | 2 +-
drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/verbs_txreq.h | 3 +-
17 files changed, 174 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B
On Thu, 2019-06-20 at 12:10 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> 2d3c72ed5041 ("rdma: Remove nes")
Yeah, not much you can do about tree wide patchsets conflicting with a
removal ;-)
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B
fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your
> tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly
PACE bit is set in qp->s_flags.
Thanks, applied to for-next.
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57
2FDD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
model: Passing null pointer cq->umem to ib_umem_release,
> which dereferences it"
>
> Is the logic inverted on that null check?
>
> Colin
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57
2FDD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
minimise any
> particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
Thanks Stephen. There will be at least one more coming too. We've had
a number of -rc patches and -next patches that touch the same area of
code this cycle.
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B
On Thu, 2019-06-13 at 18:58 +0200, Håkon Bugge wrote:
> > On 13 Jun 2019, at 16:25, Doug Ledford wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2019-02-26 at 08:57 +0100, Håkon Bugge wrote:
> > > During certain workloads, the default CM response timeout is too
> > > short, leadi
On Thu, 2019-06-13 at 08:28 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 6/13/19 7:25 AM, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > So, to revive this patch, what I'd like to see is some attempt to
> > actually quantify a reasonable timeout for the default backlog
> > depth,
> > then the p
e
timeout, and then put in the ability to adjust the timeout with some
sort of doc guidance on how to calculate a reasonable timeout based on
configured backlog depth.
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57
2FDD
signa
icting tree to
> minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
>
Sorry, I forgot to back that head commit out. Once Linus committed his
fix the one in the rdma tree was superfluous (and wrong anyway).
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4
On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 21:00 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 01:13:01PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 09:48 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 9:29 AM Doug Ledford wrote:
> > > > drivers/inf
On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 09:48 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 9:29 AM Doug Ledford wrote:
> >
> > drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> This trivial one-liner is actually incorre
On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 11:42 -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 08:40 +, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 08:09:47AM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 11:52:12AM +, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > Hi Li
insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
get_page(vmf->page);
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
>
> Thanks Heiko, this looks right to me.
>
> I'm surprised to be seeing this at this point, these patches should
> have been seen by 0 day for several days now, and they were in
> linux-next already too..
>
> Doug, can you send this to Linus today?
Yep.
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
to space
> > deallocated by a call to the free or realloc function is used (7.22.3).
> >
> > Since the C standard explicitly refers to free() and realloc(), does that
> > mean that that statement about undefined behavior does not apply to munmap()
> > (for user space code) nor to kfree() (for kernel code)?
> >
> > Bart.
> >
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
nflicts.
>
Thanks Stephen, we'll add it to the (largish this release) list of
conflicts to bring to Linus' attention.
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
cm.max_backlog and
> net.iw_cm.default_backlog. The core network stack seems to use sysctl
> and not ip tool to set basically globals.
>
> To use rdma tool, we'd have to have some concept of a "module" object, I
> guess. IE there's dev, link, and resource rdma tool objects currently.
> But these cma timeout settings are really not per dev, link, nor a
> resource. Maybe we have just a "core" object: rdma core set
> cma_max_cm_retries min 8 max 30.
I don’t know, I think you make a fairly good argument for leaving it as a
sysctl. We have infrastructure in place for admins to set persistent sysctl
settings. The per device/link settings need something different because link
names and such can change. Since these are globals, I’d leave them where they
are.
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
ugh
> happens (assuming that the fall through is intentional).
>
Thanks Stephen, we'll sort it and make an appropriate fixup patch.
Kaike?
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
oug Ledford wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 15:08 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 08:03:56AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 07:16:21PM +, Christopher Lameter wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 6 Feb 2019, Doug
On Thu, 2019-02-07 at 10:41 -0500, Tom Talpey wrote:
> On 2/7/2019 10:37 AM, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > On Thu, 2019-02-07 at 10:28 -0500, Tom Talpey wrote:
> > > On 2/7/2019 10:04 AM, Chuck Lever wrote:
> > > > > On Feb 7, 2019, at 12:23 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
oesn't tell the
communication agent about a broken lease, it want's to be able to do
things 100% transparently without any work on the communication agent's
part. That works for ODP, but not for anything else. If the filesystem
notified the communication agent of the need to drop the MMU region and
rebuild
On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 14:44 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 2:25 PM Doug Ledford wrote:
> > Can someone give me a real world scenario that someone is *actually*
> > asking for with this?
>
> I'll point to this example. At the 6:35 mark Kodi talks about
On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 14:44 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 2:25 PM Doug Ledford wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 15:08 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 08:03:56AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Fe
On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 15:08 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 08:03:56AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 07:16:21PM +, Christopher Lameter wrote:
> > > On Wed, 6 Feb 2019, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > >
> > >
On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 13:04 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 12:14 PM Doug Ledford wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 11:45 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 10:52 AM Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 10
On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 12:20 -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 03:16:02PM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 11:40 -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 07:16:21PM +, Christopher Lameter wrote:
> > > > tho
On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 12:49 -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 03:47:53PM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 12:41 -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 03:28:35PM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > > > On
On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 12:41 -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 03:28:35PM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 12:20 -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 03:16:02PM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > > > On
On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 12:20 -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 03:16:02PM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 11:40 -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 07:16:21PM +, Christopher Lameter wrote:
> > > > tho
he device (something
that would have returned ETXTBSY)?
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
is a major case of dissonant cognitive behavior here if the
syscall supports ETXTBSY, even though the ability to kill apps using the
text pages is trivial, but thinks supporting EBUSY is out of the
question.
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 10:35 -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 01:32:04PM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 09:52 -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 10:31:14AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > On W
ot;this file has pinned pages that can not be freed" is not
(or should not be) totally out of the question.
Admittedly, I'm coming in late to this conversation, but did I miss the
portion where that alternative was ruled out?
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
7 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
en your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
en your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ild test robot
> > ---
>
> applied to for-next, thanks
>
> Jason
This caused a conflict with your make write() handlers use a consistent
flow series, which I fixed up during git am run. Just FYI in case you
want to check out the conflict spot as a double check (but it was a
sim
ild test robot
> > ---
>
> applied to for-next, thanks
>
> Jason
This caused a conflict with your make write() handlers use a consistent
flow series, which I fixed up during git am run. Just FYI in case you
want to check out the conflict spot as a double check (but it was a
sim
/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_mr.c
> > @@ -1219,7 +1219,7 @@ struct ib_mr *hns_roce_alloc_mr(struct ib_pd *pd,
> > enum ib_mr_type mr_type,
> > int ret;
> >
> > page_size = 1 << (hr_dev->caps.pbl_buf_pg_sz + PAGE_SHIFT);
> > - length = max_num_sg * p
/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_mr.c
> > @@ -1219,7 +1219,7 @@ struct ib_mr *hns_roce_alloc_mr(struct ib_pd *pd,
> > enum ib_mr_type mr_type,
> > int ret;
> >
> > page_size = 1 << (hr_dev->caps.pbl_buf_pg_sz + PAGE_SHIFT);
> > - length = max_num_sg * p
es, my v2
> was partly original submission plus a v2. That probably fooled
> both the kbuild bot and patchwork
>
> 2.14.3
Thanks, applied.
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
es, my v2
> was partly original submission plus a v2. That probably fooled
> both the kbuild bot and patchwork
>
> 2.14.3
Thanks, applied.
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
the first load and not worry if it can be
> completed with a dependent load/store [1].
>
> [1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=152449131114778=2
>
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
Thanks, applied to for-rc.
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3
the first load and not worry if it can be
> completed with a dependent load/store [1].
>
> [1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=152449131114778=2
>
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
Thanks, applied to for-rc.
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3
the first load and not worry if it can be
> completed with a dependent load/store [1].
>
> [1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=152449131114778=2
>
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
Thanks, applied to for-rc.
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3
the first load and not worry if it can be
> completed with a dependent load/store [1].
>
> [1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=152449131114778=2
>
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva
Thanks, applied to for-rc.
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3
On Tue, 2018-10-09 at 14:46 -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
>
> On Tue., Oct. 9, 2018, 2:44 p.m. Kamal Heib, wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 02:31:27PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2018-10-09 at 19:27 +0300, Kamal Heib wrote:
> > > > Thi
On Tue, 2018-10-09 at 14:46 -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
>
> On Tue., Oct. 9, 2018, 2:44 p.m. Kamal Heib, wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 02:31:27PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2018-10-09 at 19:27 +0300, Kamal Heib wrote:
> > > > Thi
ired changes in the core and ulps to start using it.
>
> Thanks,
> Kamal
Hi Kamal,
Please repost this to linux-r...@vger.kernel.org as that's how this gets
into patchworks.
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57
ired changes in the core and ulps to start using it.
>
> Thanks,
> Kamal
Hi Kamal,
Please repost this to linux-r...@vger.kernel.org as that's how this gets
into patchworks.
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57
; =
>
> Remove the unnecessary parentheses to silence this warning.
>
> Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor
Applied to for-next, thanks.
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B
; =
>
> Remove the unnecessary parentheses to silence this warning.
>
> Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor
Applied to for-next, thanks.
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B
On Thu, 2018-09-20 at 17:52 +0800, zhong jiang wrote:
> kfree_skb has taken the null pointer into account. hence it is safe
> to remove the redundant null pointer check before kfree_skb.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang
Applied to for-next, thanks.
--
Doug Ledford
if ((method == IB_MGMT_METHOD_GET_RESP)) {
> ^~
> =
>
> Remove the unnecessary parentheses to silence this warning.
>
> Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor
Applied to for-next, thanks.
--
Doug Ledford
G
On Thu, 2018-09-20 at 17:52 +0800, zhong jiang wrote:
> kfree_skb has taken the null pointer into account. hence it is safe
> to remove the redundant null pointer check before kfree_skb.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang
Applied to for-next, thanks.
--
Doug Ledford
if ((method == IB_MGMT_METHOD_GET_RESP)) {
> ^~
> =
>
> Remove the unnecessary parentheses to silence this warning.
>
> Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor
Applied to for-next, thanks.
--
Doug Ledford
G
t; pattern is already used by ucma_destroy_id().
>
> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+da2591e115d57a9cb...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Reported-by: syzbot+cfe3c1e8ef634ba89...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe
> Cc: Doug Ledford
> Cc: Leon Romanovsky
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang
T
t; pattern is already used by ucma_destroy_id().
>
> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+da2591e115d57a9cb...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Reported-by: syzbot+cfe3c1e8ef634ba89...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe
> Cc: Doug Ledford
> Cc: Leon Romanovsky
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang
T
eletion(-)
> >
>
> Thanks,
> Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky
Thanks, applied to for-next.
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
eletion(-)
> >
>
> Thanks,
> Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky
Thanks, applied to for-next.
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 09:01 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 10:24:18PM +0300, Igor Stoppa wrote:
> > Typically the assert is expected to not fail.
>
> This whole assert can be removed.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Stoppa
> > Acked-
On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 09:01 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 10:24:18PM +0300, Igor Stoppa wrote:
> > Typically the assert is expected to not fail.
>
> This whole assert can be removed.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Stoppa
> > Acked-
On Fri, 2018-08-31 at 01:34 +0300, Igor Stoppa wrote:
> Typically the assert is expected to not fail.
>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Stoppa
> Cc: Chien Tung
> Cc: Roland Dreier
> Cc: Faisal Latif
> Cc: Doug Ledford
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe
Acked-by: Doug Ledford
> ---
&
On Fri, 2018-08-31 at 01:34 +0300, Igor Stoppa wrote:
> Typically the assert is expected to not fail.
>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Stoppa
> Cc: Chien Tung
> Cc: Roland Dreier
> Cc: Faisal Latif
> Cc: Doug Ledford
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe
Acked-by: Doug Ledford
> ---
&
On Thu, 2018-08-23 at 16:39 +, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jason Gunthorpe
> > Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2018 9:55 AM
> > To: Eric Biggers
> > Cc: Doug Ledford ; linux-r...@vger.kernel.org;
> > dasaratharaman.cha
On Thu, 2018-08-23 at 16:39 +, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jason Gunthorpe
> > Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2018 9:55 AM
> > To: Eric Biggers
> > Cc: Doug Ledford ; linux-r...@vger.kernel.org;
> > dasaratharaman.cha
able rdma-cm, including all
> > support for rx'ing remote packets? Greg?
>
> Yes. That's my goal when INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS is unset.
>
> > If this is required for iwarp then Arnd's patch is probably the right
> > way to go..
> > Jason
>
> Agreed.
> Acked-by: Greg Thelen
If that's the case, then there should be a NOTE: in the Kconfig that
disabling the connection manager completely disables iWARP hardware.
I don't really think I like this approach though. At a minimum if you
are going to make iWARP totally dependent on rdmacm, then there is zero
reason that iw_cm.o should be part of the obj-$(CONFIG_INFINIBAND)
Makefile recipe when ADDR_TRANS is disabled.
We can take this patch as a band-aid, but IMO it's either incomplete or
simply not the right solution.
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
able rdma-cm, including all
> > support for rx'ing remote packets? Greg?
>
> Yes. That's my goal when INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS is unset.
>
> > If this is required for iwarp then Arnd's patch is probably the right
> > way to go..
> > Jason
>
> Agreed.
> Acked-by: Greg Thelen
If that's the case, then there should be a NOTE: in the Kconfig that
disabling the connection manager completely disables iWARP hardware.
I don't really think I like this approach though. At a minimum if you
are going to make iWARP totally dependent on rdmacm, then there is zero
reason that iw_cm.o should be part of the obj-$(CONFIG_INFINIBAND)
Makefile recipe when ADDR_TRANS is disabled.
We can take this patch as a band-aid, but IMO it's either incomplete or
simply not the right solution.
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2018-05-30 at 10:40 +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King
>
> Trivial fix to spelling mistake in DP_ERR error message
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King
Thanks, applied.
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B
On Wed, 2018-05-30 at 10:40 +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King
>
> Trivial fix to spelling mistake in DP_ERR error message
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King
Thanks, applied.
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B
t;
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <j...@perches.com>
I don't see any problem with this patch. For the IB part:
Acked-by: Doug Ledford <dledf...@redhat.com>
--
Doug Ledford <dledf...@redhat.com>
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B
1 - 100 of 938 matches
Mail list logo
