> Giampaolo,
>
> Should read: ...even if the ATMSAR actually lacks of AAL1, AAL2
> and AAL3/4 [where AAL3/4 is obsolete] capabilities...
>
> Just wanted to make it more precise according to the ATM
> standards, this was the only intention of my "patch".
You're right. Sorry about that.
Giampaolo,
Should read: ...even if the ATMSAR actually lacks of AAL1, AAL2
and AAL3/4 [where AAL3/4 is obsolete] capabilities...
Just wanted to make it more precise according to the ATM
standards, this was the only intention of my patch.
You're right. Sorry about that.
Thanks,
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: matthieu castet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Inviato: domenica 4 settembre 2005 21.11
>
> ...omissis...
>
> The problem is that lot's of new devices implement part of their dsp
> function in the kernel space instead of in the device.
> And as company don't
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: matthieu castet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Inviato: domenica 4 settembre 2005 21.11
>
> ...omissis...
>
> The problem is that lot's of new devices implement part of their dsp
> function in the kernel space instead of in the device.
> And as company don't
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: Francois Romieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Inviato: domenica 4 settembre 2005 17.33
> A: Giampaolo Tomassoni
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Oggetto: Re: R: [Linux-ATM-General] [ATMSAR] Request for review - upda
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: Alistair John Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Inviato: domenica 4 settembre 2005 18.21
>
> ...omissis...
>
> Just out of curiosity, is there ANY reason why this has to be done in the
> kernel? The PPPoATM module for pppd implements (via linux-atm) a
>
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] conto di
> Francois Romieu
> Inviato: domenica 4 settembre 2005 14.01
> A: Giampaolo Tomassoni
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Oggetto: Re: [Linux-ATM-General]
-Messaggio originale-
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] conto di
Francois Romieu
Inviato: domenica 4 settembre 2005 14.01
A: Giampaolo Tomassoni
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oggetto: Re: [Linux-ATM-General] [ATMSAR] Request for review - update
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Alistair John Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: domenica 4 settembre 2005 18.21
...omissis...
Just out of curiosity, is there ANY reason why this has to be done in the
kernel? The PPPoATM module for pppd implements (via linux-atm) a
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Francois Romieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: domenica 4 settembre 2005 17.33
A: Giampaolo Tomassoni
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oggetto: Re: R: [Linux-ATM-General] [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1
...omissis...
I'd
-Messaggio originale-
Da: matthieu castet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: domenica 4 settembre 2005 21.11
...omissis...
The problem is that lot's of new devices implement part of their dsp
function in the kernel space instead of in the device.
And as company don't want to
-Messaggio originale-
Da: matthieu castet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: domenica 4 settembre 2005 21.11
...omissis...
The problem is that lot's of new devices implement part of their dsp
function in the kernel space instead of in the device.
And as company don't want to
12 matches
Mail list logo