On 3/11/2021 9:10 AM, David Howells (dhowe...@redhat.com) wrote:
I wonder if it's better to just hide all the afs.* xattrs from listxattr().
It would probably be even better to not use xattrs for this, but I'm not
sure what I would use instead.
I believe that all of the "afs.*" xattrs should be
On 8/14/2020 1:05 PM, Linus Torvalds (torva...@linux-foundation.org) wrote:
> Honestly, I really think you may want an extended [f]statfs(), not
> some mount tracking.
>
> Linus
Linus,
Thank you for the reply. Perhaps some of the communication disconnect
is due to which thread
On 8/12/2020 2:18 PM, Linus Torvalds (torva...@linux-foundation.org) wrote:
> What's wrong with fstatfs()? All the extra magic metadata seems to not
> really be anything people really care about.
>
> What people are actually asking for seems to be some unique mount ID,
> and we have 16 bytes of sp
On 9/19/2019 9:15 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> Why is it organised this way? I mean, yes, technically, rxrpc is a
> generic layer-6 protocol that any blah blah blah, but in practice no
> other user has come up in the last 37 years, so why bother pretending
> one is going to? Just git mv net/rxrpc
David,
Looks good to me.
You can add a Reviewed-by line.
Thanks.
Jeffrey Altman
On 8/9/2019 5:47 PM, David Howells wrote:
> Fix rxrpc_unuse_local() to handle a NULL local pointer as it can be called
> on an unbound socket on which rx->local is not yet set.
>
> The following reproduced (includ
This change is correct.
On 8/9/2019 4:43 AM, YueHaibing wrote:
> It seems that 'yfs_RXYFSStoreOpaqueACL2' should be use in
> yfs_fs_store_opaque_acl2().
>
> Fixes: f5e4546347bc ("afs: Implement YFS ACL setting")
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing
> ---
> fs/afs/yfsclient.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1
Confirmed.
On 8/9/2019 4:42 AM, YueHaibing wrote:
> fs/afs/fsclient.c:18:29: warning:
> afs_zero_fid defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
>
> It is never used since commit 025db80c9e42 ("afs: Trace
> the initiation and completion of client calls")
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot
> Signe
This is true but I believe afs_voltypes should be used in the
afs_put_volume() and afs_deactivate_volume() enter() tracing.
If it will not be used for those calls then removal is correct.
Jeffrey Altman
On 8/9/2019 4:40 AM, YueHaibing wrote:
> fs/afs/volume.c:15:26: warning:
> afs_voltypes defi
8 matches
Mail list logo