Re: Policy question (was Re: [2.6.12-rc1][ACPI][suspend] /proc/acpi/sleep vs /sys/power/state issue - 'standby' on a laptop)

2005-04-11 Thread Shawn Starr
Well, of course. When I get around to figuring out the best way to do this. Since I don't want to bloat up sysfs ACPI stuff just to check if the echoed value is a number or string. We can just gradually phase it out by just marking it DEPRECATED and keep it ON in the Kbuild file so nobody

Policy question (was Re: [2.6.12-rc1][ACPI][suspend] /proc/acpi/sleep vs /sys/power/state issue - 'standby' on a laptop)

2005-04-11 Thread Rob Landley
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 05:22 pm, Shawn Starr wrote: > --- Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi! > > > > > So nobody minds if I make this into a CONFIG > > > > option marked as Deprecated? :) > > > > Actually it should probably go through > > > >

Policy question (was Re: [2.6.12-rc1][ACPI][suspend] /proc/acpi/sleep vs /sys/power/state issue - 'standby' on a laptop)

2005-04-11 Thread Rob Landley
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 05:22 pm, Shawn Starr wrote: --- Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! So nobody minds if I make this into a CONFIG option marked as Deprecated? :) Actually it should probably go through Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt ...and give

Re: Policy question (was Re: [2.6.12-rc1][ACPI][suspend] /proc/acpi/sleep vs /sys/power/state issue - 'standby' on a laptop)

2005-04-11 Thread Shawn Starr
Well, of course. When I get around to figuring out the best way to do this. Since I don't want to bloat up sysfs ACPI stuff just to check if the echoed value is a number or string. We can just gradually phase it out by just marking it DEPRECATED and keep it ON in the Kbuild file so nobody

Re: [2.6.12-rc1][ACPI][suspend] /proc/acpi/sleep vs /sys/power/state issue - 'standby' on a laptop

2005-04-06 Thread Shawn Starr
Yeah, I can do that, I don't need angry programmers chasing after me :-) Shawn. --- Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > > So nobody minds if I make this into a CONFIG > option marked as Deprecated? :) > > Actually it should probably go through > >

Re: [2.6.12-rc1][ACPI][suspend] /proc/acpi/sleep vs /sys/power/state issue - 'standby' on a laptop

2005-04-06 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > So nobody minds if I make this into a CONFIG option marked as Deprecated? :) Actually it should probably go through Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt ...and give it *long* timeout, since it is API change.

Re: [2.6.12-rc1][ACPI][suspend] /proc/acpi/sleep vs /sys/power/state issue - 'standby' on a laptop

2005-04-06 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! So nobody minds if I make this into a CONFIG option marked as Deprecated? :) Actually it should probably go through Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt ...and give it *long* timeout, since it is API change.

Re: [2.6.12-rc1][ACPI][suspend] /proc/acpi/sleep vs /sys/power/state issue - 'standby' on a laptop

2005-04-06 Thread Shawn Starr
Yeah, I can do that, I don't need angry programmers chasing after me :-) Shawn. --- Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! So nobody minds if I make this into a CONFIG option marked as Deprecated? :) Actually it should probably go through

Re: [2.6.12-rc1][ACPI][suspend] /proc/acpi/sleep vs /sys/power/state issue - 'standby' on a laptop

2005-04-05 Thread Shawn Starr
So nobody minds if I make this into a CONFIG option marked as Deprecated? :) Shawn. > > > Do you know if /proc/acpi/sleep will be deprecated in > > favour of /sys/power/state? If so, this thread will be > > moot ;) > > No idea, deprecating it would be ok with me. > >Pavel

Re: [2.6.12-rc1][ACPI][suspend] /proc/acpi/sleep vs /sys/power/state issue - 'standby' on a laptop

2005-04-05 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > I'm working o ??? > > > [4294672.065000] ACPI: CPU0 (power states: C1[C1] > > C2[C2] C3[C3]) > > > [4294676.827000] ACPI: (supports S0 S3 S4 S5) > > > > > > ...aha, but your system does not support S1 aka > > standby. > > > > Right, so nothing should happen if I try to do it, but >

Re: [2.6.12-rc1][ACPI][suspend] /proc/acpi/sleep vs /sys/power/state issue - 'standby' on a laptop

2005-04-05 Thread Shawn Starr
I'm working o --- Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > > I've noticed something strange with issuing > 'standby' to the system: > > > > when echoing "standby" to /sys/power/state, > nothing happens, not even a log or > > system activity to attempt standby mode. > > > > However,

Re: [2.6.12-rc1][ACPI][suspend] /proc/acpi/sleep vs /sys/power/state issue - 'standby' on a laptop

2005-04-05 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > I've noticed something strange with issuing 'standby' to the system: > > when echoing "standby" to /sys/power/state, nothing happens, not even a log > or > system activity to attempt standby mode. > > However, trying echo "1" to /proc/acpi/sleep the system attempts to (standby) > and

Re: [2.6.12-rc1][ACPI][suspend] /proc/acpi/sleep vs /sys/power/state issue - 'standby' on a laptop

2005-04-05 Thread Shawn Starr
I'm working o --- Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! I've noticed something strange with issuing 'standby' to the system: when echoing standby to /sys/power/state, nothing happens, not even a log or system activity to attempt standby mode. However, trying echo 1 to

Re: [2.6.12-rc1][ACPI][suspend] /proc/acpi/sleep vs /sys/power/state issue - 'standby' on a laptop

2005-04-05 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! I'm working o ??? [4294672.065000] ACPI: CPU0 (power states: C1[C1] C2[C2] C3[C3]) [4294676.827000] ACPI: (supports S0 S3 S4 S5) ...aha, but your system does not support S1 aka standby. Right, so nothing should happen if I try to do it, but something does only in

Re: [2.6.12-rc1][ACPI][suspend] /proc/acpi/sleep vs /sys/power/state issue - 'standby' on a laptop

2005-04-05 Thread Shawn Starr
So nobody minds if I make this into a CONFIG option marked as Deprecated? :) Shawn. Do you know if /proc/acpi/sleep will be deprecated in favour of /sys/power/state? If so, this thread will be moot ;) No idea, deprecating it would be ok with me. Pavel pgpGfWAs0n7J0.pgp

Re: [2.6.12-rc1][ACPI][suspend] /proc/acpi/sleep vs /sys/power/state issue - 'standby' on a laptop

2005-04-05 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! I've noticed something strange with issuing 'standby' to the system: when echoing standby to /sys/power/state, nothing happens, not even a log or system activity to attempt standby mode. However, trying echo 1 to /proc/acpi/sleep the system attempts to (standby) and aborts:

[2.6.12-rc1][ACPI][suspend] /proc/acpi/sleep vs /sys/power/state issue - 'standby' on a laptop

2005-03-27 Thread Shawn Starr
Hello, I've noticed something strange with issuing 'standby' to the system: when echoing "standby" to /sys/power/state, nothing happens, not even a log or system activity to attempt standby mode. However, trying echo "1" to /proc/acpi/sleep the system attempts to (standby) and aborts:

[2.6.12-rc1][ACPI][suspend] /proc/acpi/sleep vs /sys/power/state issue - 'standby' on a laptop

2005-03-27 Thread Shawn Starr
Hello, I've noticed something strange with issuing 'standby' to the system: when echoing standby to /sys/power/state, nothing happens, not even a log or system activity to attempt standby mode. However, trying echo 1 to /proc/acpi/sleep the system attempts to (standby) and aborts: