On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
>> > I looked in today's linux-next, and there seems to be only one
>> > initialization of this field, to true, and one test of this field. So
>> > perhaps the case for setting the field to false just isn't needed.
>>
>> Oh sorry now I get
> > I looked in today's linux-next, and there seems to be only one
> > initialization of this field, to true, and one test of this field. So
> > perhaps the case for setting the field to false just isn't needed.
>
> Oh sorry now I get what you mean! I thought about this -- and yes I
> decided to
I looked in today's linux-next, and there seems to be only one
initialization of this field, to true, and one test of this field. So
perhaps the case for setting the field to false just isn't needed.
Oh sorry now I get what you mean! I thought about this -- and yes I
decided to not add
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Julia Lawall julia.law...@lip6.fr wrote:
I looked in today's linux-next, and there seems to be only one
initialization of this field, to true, and one test of this field. So
perhaps the case for setting the field to false just isn't needed.
Oh sorry now I
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
>> > On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Thanks Julia! I'll be sure to try to add this to compat-drivers if the
>>
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks Julia! I'll be sure to try to add this to compat-drivers if the
> >> upstream fb patch is not accepted. If it is accepted we
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Julia! I'll be sure to try to add this to compat-drivers if the
>> upstream fb patch is not accepted. If it is accepted we would not need
>> this at all!
>>
>> > Then I guess there
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> >> > - info->skip_vt_switch = true;
> >> > + fb_enable_skip_vt_switch(info);
> >> >
> >> > So we'd then have to just add this
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>> > - info->skip_vt_switch = true;
>> > + fb_enable_skip_vt_switch(info);
>> >
>> > So we'd then have to just add this static inline change for each new
>> > driver...
>> > There
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 05:04:26 -0700
> "Luis R. Rodriguez" wrote:
>
> > The new commit by Jesse that extended the fb_info with a skip_vt_switch
> > element is the simplest example of a data structure expansion. We'd backport
> > this by adding a static
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 05:04:26 -0700
"Luis R. Rodriguez" wrote:
> The new commit by Jesse that extended the fb_info with a skip_vt_switch
> element is the simplest example of a data structure expansion. We'd backport
> this by adding a static inline to compat so that new kernels muck with the
>
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
I maintain the the compat-drivers project [0] which aims at backporting the
Linux kernel drivers down to older kernels, automatically [1]. Thanks to
Ozan Caglayan as a GSoC project we now backport DRM drivers.
The initial framework we had set up to help with the
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Julia Lawall julia.law...@lip6.fr wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Jesse Barnes wrote:
- info-skip_vt_switch = true;
+ fb_enable_skip_vt_switch(info);
So we'd then have to just add this static inline change for each new
driver...
There
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Julia Lawall julia.law...@lip6.fr wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Jesse Barnes wrote:
- info-skip_vt_switch = true;
+ fb_enable_skip_vt_switch(info);
So we'd then have to just add this
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Julia Lawall julia.law...@lip6.fr wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Thanks Julia! I'll be sure to try to add this to compat-drivers if the
upstream fb patch is not accepted. If it is accepted we would not need
this at all!
Then I guess
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Julia Lawall julia.law...@lip6.fr wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Thanks Julia! I'll be sure to try to add this to compat-drivers if the
upstream fb patch is not accepted. If it is
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Julia Lawall julia.law...@lip6.fr wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Julia Lawall julia.law...@lip6.fr wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Thanks Julia! I'll be sure to try to add this to
From: Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@do-not-panic.com
I maintain the the compat-drivers project [0] which aims at backporting the
Linux kernel drivers down to older kernels, automatically [1]. Thanks to
Ozan Caglayan as a GSoC project we now backport DRM drivers.
The initial framework we had set up to
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 05:04:26 -0700
Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@do-not-panic.com wrote:
The new commit by Jesse that extended the fb_info with a skip_vt_switch
element is the simplest example of a data structure expansion. We'd backport
this by adding a static inline to compat so that new kernels
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 05:04:26 -0700
Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@do-not-panic.com wrote:
The new commit by Jesse that extended the fb_info with a skip_vt_switch
element is the simplest example of a data structure expansion. We'd backport
this by adding
20 matches
Mail list logo
