Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24 July 2014 08:32, Saravana Kannan wrote:
>> Ok, I think I've figured this out. But one question. Is it possible to
>> physically remove one CPU in a bunch of "related cpus" without also
>> unplugging the rest? Put another way, can you unplug one core from a
>> cluster?
On 24 July 2014 08:32, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> Ok, I think I've figured this out. But one question. Is it possible to
> physically remove one CPU in a bunch of "related cpus" without also
> unplugging the rest? Put another way, can you unplug one core from a
> cluster?
Are we talking about doing
On 07/16/2014 03:02 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, July 09, 2014 07:37:30 PM Saravana Kannan wrote:
Preliminary patch. Not tested. Just sending out to give an idea of what I'm
looking to do. Expect a lot more simplification when it's done.
Benefits:
* A lot more simpler code.
* Less
On 07/16/2014 03:02 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, July 09, 2014 07:37:30 PM Saravana Kannan wrote:
Preliminary patch. Not tested. Just sending out to give an idea of what I'm
looking to do. Expect a lot more simplification when it's done.
Benefits:
* A lot more simpler code.
* Less
On Wednesday, July 09, 2014 07:37:30 PM Saravana Kannan wrote:
> Preliminary patch. Not tested. Just sending out to give an idea of what I'm
> looking to do. Expect a lot more simplification when it's done.
>
> Benefits:
> * A lot more simpler code.
> * Less stability issues.
> * Suspend/resume ti
Preliminary patch. Not tested. Just sending out to give an idea of what I'm
looking to do. Expect a lot more simplification when it's done.
Benefits:
* A lot more simpler code.
* Less stability issues.
* Suspend/resume time would improve.
* Hotplug time would improve.
* Sysfs file permissions woul
6 matches
Mail list logo
