Re: [PATCH] h8300: switch to NO_BOOTMEM

2018-05-08 Thread Yoshinori Sato
On Sat, 17 Mar 2018 06:33:06 +0900, Rob Herring wrote: > > Commit 0fa1c579349f ("of/fdt: use memblock_virt_alloc for early alloc") > inadvertently switched the DT unflattening allocations from memblock to > bootmem which doesn't work because the unflattening happens before > bootmem is initialized

Re: [PATCH] h8300: switch to NO_BOOTMEM

2018-05-02 Thread Yoshinori Sato
On Wed, 02 May 2018 11:33:41 +0900, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 4:33 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > > Commit 0fa1c579349f ("of/fdt: use memblock_virt_alloc for early alloc") > > inadvertently switched the DT unflattening allocations from memblock to > > bootmem which doesn't work bec

Re: [PATCH] h8300: switch to NO_BOOTMEM

2018-05-01 Thread Rob Herring
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 4:33 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > Commit 0fa1c579349f ("of/fdt: use memblock_virt_alloc for early alloc") > inadvertently switched the DT unflattening allocations from memblock to > bootmem which doesn't work because the unflattening happens before > bootmem is initialized. Swa

[PATCH] h8300: switch to NO_BOOTMEM

2018-03-16 Thread Rob Herring
Commit 0fa1c579349f ("of/fdt: use memblock_virt_alloc for early alloc") inadvertently switched the DT unflattening allocations from memblock to bootmem which doesn't work because the unflattening happens before bootmem is initialized. Swapping the order of bootmem init and unflattening could also f