Re: [PATCH] lib/bug.c: use common WARN helper

2016-02-23 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 21:54:17 -0600 Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > The traceoff_on_warning option doesn't have any effect on s390, powerpc, > arm64, parisc, and sh because there are two different types of WARN > implementations: > > 1) The above mentioned architectures treat WARN()

Re: [PATCH] lib/bug.c: use common WARN helper

2016-02-23 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 21:54:17 -0600 Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > The traceoff_on_warning option doesn't have any effect on s390, powerpc, > arm64, parisc, and sh because there are two different types of WARN > implementations: > > 1) The above mentioned architectures treat WARN() as a special case of

Re: [PATCH] lib/bug.c: use common WARN helper

2016-02-23 Thread Prarit Bhargava
On 02/22/2016 10:54 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > The traceoff_on_warning option doesn't have any effect on s390, powerpc, > arm64, parisc, and sh because there are two different types of WARN > implementations: > > 1) The above mentioned architectures treat WARN() as a special case of a >

Re: [PATCH] lib/bug.c: use common WARN helper

2016-02-23 Thread Prarit Bhargava
On 02/22/2016 10:54 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > The traceoff_on_warning option doesn't have any effect on s390, powerpc, > arm64, parisc, and sh because there are two different types of WARN > implementations: > > 1) The above mentioned architectures treat WARN() as a special case of a >

Re: [PATCH] lib/bug.c: use common WARN helper

2016-02-23 Thread Heiko Carstens
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 09:54:17PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > The traceoff_on_warning option doesn't have any effect on s390, powerpc, > arm64, parisc, and sh because there are two different types of WARN > implementations: > > 1) The above mentioned architectures treat WARN() as a special

Re: [PATCH] lib/bug.c: use common WARN helper

2016-02-23 Thread Heiko Carstens
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 09:54:17PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > The traceoff_on_warning option doesn't have any effect on s390, powerpc, > arm64, parisc, and sh because there are two different types of WARN > implementations: > > 1) The above mentioned architectures treat WARN() as a special

[PATCH] lib/bug.c: use common WARN helper

2016-02-22 Thread Josh Poimboeuf
The traceoff_on_warning option doesn't have any effect on s390, powerpc, arm64, parisc, and sh because there are two different types of WARN implementations: 1) The above mentioned architectures treat WARN() as a special case of a BUG() exception. They handle warnings in report_bug() in

[PATCH] lib/bug.c: use common WARN helper

2016-02-22 Thread Josh Poimboeuf
The traceoff_on_warning option doesn't have any effect on s390, powerpc, arm64, parisc, and sh because there are two different types of WARN implementations: 1) The above mentioned architectures treat WARN() as a special case of a BUG() exception. They handle warnings in report_bug() in