On Saturday 05 March 2005 13:47, Jody McIntyre wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 11:55:09PM +0100, Panagiotis Issaris wrote:
>> Adds the missing failure handling for a __copy_to_user call.
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Panagiotis Issaris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Sorry I didn't notice this sooner, but this
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 11:55:09PM +0100, Panagiotis Issaris wrote:
> Adds the missing failure handling for a __copy_to_user call.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Panagiotis Issaris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sorry I didn't notice this sooner, but this was already fixed and has
been sent to Linus (hopefully to
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 11:55:09PM +0100, Panagiotis Issaris wrote:
Adds the missing failure handling for a __copy_to_user call.
Signed-off-by: Panagiotis Issaris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry I didn't notice this sooner, but this was already fixed and has
been sent to Linus (hopefully to appear
On Saturday 05 March 2005 13:47, Jody McIntyre wrote:
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 11:55:09PM +0100, Panagiotis Issaris wrote:
Adds the missing failure handling for a __copy_to_user call.
Signed-off-by: Panagiotis Issaris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry I didn't notice this sooner, but this was already
Hi Jody,
My previous e-mail seemed to be messed up by Thunderbird... so now I'm using
good
old Mutt again.
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 04:48:43PM -0500 or thereabouts, Jody McIntyre wrote:
> > Thanks. Here's my third try :-)
> >
> > With friendly regards,
> > Takis
>
> I'll apply this to the 1394
Hi,
Jody McIntyre wrote:
I'll apply this to the 1394 tree and send it to Linus after testing if
you add a Signed-off-by: line per Documentation/SubmittingPatches .
Also, please cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] with ieee1394
changes.
Sure! Thanks!
Adds the missing failure handling for a __copy_to_user call.
> Thanks. Here's my third try :-)
>
> With friendly regards,
> Takis
I'll apply this to the 1394 tree and send it to Linus after testing if
you add a Signed-off-by: line per Documentation/SubmittingPatches .
Also, please cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] with ieee1394
changes.
Thanks,
Jody
>
> --
>
Thanks. Here's my third try :-)
With friendly regards,
Takis
I'll apply this to the 1394 tree and send it to Linus after testing if
you add a Signed-off-by: line per Documentation/SubmittingPatches .
Also, please cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] with ieee1394
changes.
Thanks,
Jody
--
K.U.Leuven,
Hi,
Jody McIntyre wrote:
I'll apply this to the 1394 tree and send it to Linus after testing if
you add a Signed-off-by: line per Documentation/SubmittingPatches .
Also, please cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] with ieee1394
changes.
Sure! Thanks!
Adds the missing failure handling for a __copy_to_user call.
Hi Jody,
My previous e-mail seemed to be messed up by Thunderbird... so now I'm using
good
old Mutt again.
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 04:48:43PM -0500 or thereabouts, Jody McIntyre wrote:
Thanks. Here's my third try :-)
With friendly regards,
Takis
I'll apply this to the 1394 tree and
Hi,
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 13:28:23 +0100, Panagiotis Issaris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oops. Thanks for replying! Any more problems with the updated
patch?
Formatting... Opening curly brace should go on the same line with "if".
Thanks. Here's my third try :-)
With
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 13:28:23 +0100, Panagiotis Issaris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 12:10 +0100, Panagiotis Issaris wrote:
> >
> >
> >>In the raw1394 driver the failure handling for
> >>a __copy_to_user call is missing.
> >>
> >>
> >
>
Hi,
Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 12:10 +0100, Panagiotis Issaris wrote:
In the raw1394 driver the failure handling for
a __copy_to_user call is missing.
Your patch is obviously incorrect as it doesn't free the request before
it returns.
Oops. Thanks for replying! Any
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 12:10:50 +0100 Panagiotis Issaris wrote:
> In the raw1394 driver the failure handling for
> a __copy_to_user call is missing.
>
> With friendly regards,
> Takis
>
> --
> K.U.Leuven, Mechanical Eng., Mechatronics & Robotics Research Group
>
Hi,
On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 12:10 +0100, Panagiotis Issaris wrote:
> In the raw1394 driver the failure handling for
> a __copy_to_user call is missing.
Your patch is obviously incorrect as it doesn't free the request before
it returns.
Best regards,
Anton
--
Anton Altaparmakov (replace
Hi,
In the raw1394 driver the failure handling for
a __copy_to_user call is missing.
With friendly regards,
Takis
--
K.U.Leuven, Mechanical Eng., Mechatronics & Robotics Research Group
http://people.mech.kuleuven.ac.be/~pissaris/
diff -pruN linux-2.6.11/drivers/ieee1394/raw1394.c
Hi,
In the raw1394 driver the failure handling for
a __copy_to_user call is missing.
With friendly regards,
Takis
--
K.U.Leuven, Mechanical Eng., Mechatronics Robotics Research Group
http://people.mech.kuleuven.ac.be/~pissaris/
diff -pruN linux-2.6.11/drivers/ieee1394/raw1394.c
Hi,
On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 12:10 +0100, Panagiotis Issaris wrote:
In the raw1394 driver the failure handling for
a __copy_to_user call is missing.
Your patch is obviously incorrect as it doesn't free the request before
it returns.
Best regards,
Anton
--
Anton Altaparmakov aia21 at
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 12:10:50 +0100 Panagiotis Issaris wrote:
In the raw1394 driver the failure handling for
a __copy_to_user call is missing.
With friendly regards,
Takis
--
K.U.Leuven, Mechanical Eng., Mechatronics Robotics Research Group
Hi,
Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 12:10 +0100, Panagiotis Issaris wrote:
In the raw1394 driver the failure handling for
a __copy_to_user call is missing.
Your patch is obviously incorrect as it doesn't free the request before
it returns.
Oops. Thanks for replying! Any
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 13:28:23 +0100, Panagiotis Issaris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 12:10 +0100, Panagiotis Issaris wrote:
In the raw1394 driver the failure handling for
a __copy_to_user call is missing.
Your patch is obviously
Hi,
Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 13:28:23 +0100, Panagiotis Issaris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oops. Thanks for replying! Any more problems with the updated
patch?
Formatting... Opening curly brace should go on the same line with if.
Thanks. Here's my third try :-)
With
22 matches
Mail list logo