On Monday 21 March 2005 06:45, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> > > On Monday 21 March 2005 06:02, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> > > > > On Sunday 20 March 2005 06:59,
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Jesper Juhl wrote:
>
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> > On Monday 21 March 2005 06:02, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > > On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> > > > On Sunday 20 March 2005 06:59, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > > > > Checking a pointer for NULL
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> On Monday 21 March 2005 06:02, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> > > On Sunday 20 March 2005 06:59, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > > > Checking a pointer for NULL before calling kfree() on it is redundant,
> > > >
On Monday 21 March 2005 05:49, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 March 2005 06:59, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > > Checking a pointer for NULL before calling kfree() on it is redundant,
> > > kfree() deals with NULL pointers just fine.
> > > This
On Monday 21 March 2005 06:02, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 March 2005 06:59, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > > Checking a pointer for NULL before calling kfree() on it is redundant,
> > > kfree() deals with NULL pointers just fine.
> > > This patch
>>...
>
>This is performance critical, so I would like the check to remain. A comment
>may be added in this section.
Hm, if we used Yoshifuji's inline kfree(), you'd get both. A check and a clean
code. (Though I would not move kfree to __kfree, but make the inline variant
explicitly different
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> On Sunday 20 March 2005 06:59, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > Checking a pointer for NULL before calling kfree() on it is redundant,
> > kfree() deals with NULL pointers just fine.
> > This patch removes such checks from files in drivers/video/
> >
> >
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> On Sunday 20 March 2005 06:59, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > Checking a pointer for NULL before calling kfree() on it is redundant,
> > kfree() deals with NULL pointers just fine.
> > This patch removes such checks from files in drivers/video/
> >
> >
On Sunday 20 March 2005 06:59, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> Checking a pointer for NULL before calling kfree() on it is redundant,
> kfree() deals with NULL pointers just fine.
> This patch removes such checks from files in drivers/video/
>
> Since this is a fairly trivial change (and the same change made
On Sunday 20 March 2005 06:59, Jesper Juhl wrote:
Checking a pointer for NULL before calling kfree() on it is redundant,
kfree() deals with NULL pointers just fine.
This patch removes such checks from files in drivers/video/
Since this is a fairly trivial change (and the same change made
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2005 06:59, Jesper Juhl wrote:
Checking a pointer for NULL before calling kfree() on it is redundant,
kfree() deals with NULL pointers just fine.
This patch removes such checks from files in drivers/video/
Since this is a
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2005 06:59, Jesper Juhl wrote:
Checking a pointer for NULL before calling kfree() on it is redundant,
kfree() deals with NULL pointers just fine.
This patch removes such checks from files in drivers/video/
Since this is
...
This is performance critical, so I would like the check to remain. A comment
may be added in this section.
Hm, if we used Yoshifuji's inline kfree(), you'd get both. A check and a clean
code. (Though I would not move kfree to __kfree, but make the inline variant
explicitly different
On Monday 21 March 2005 06:02, Jesper Juhl wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2005 06:59, Jesper Juhl wrote:
Checking a pointer for NULL before calling kfree() on it is redundant,
kfree() deals with NULL pointers just fine.
This patch removes such
On Monday 21 March 2005 05:49, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2005 06:59, Jesper Juhl wrote:
Checking a pointer for NULL before calling kfree() on it is redundant,
kfree() deals with NULL pointers just fine.
This patch
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
On Monday 21 March 2005 06:02, Jesper Juhl wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2005 06:59, Jesper Juhl wrote:
Checking a pointer for NULL before calling kfree() on it is redundant,
kfree() deals with
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Jesper Juhl wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
On Monday 21 March 2005 06:02, Jesper Juhl wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2005 06:59, Jesper Juhl wrote:
Checking a pointer for NULL before calling
On Monday 21 March 2005 06:45, Jesper Juhl wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Jesper Juhl wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
On Monday 21 March 2005 06:02, Jesper Juhl wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2005 06:59, Jesper Juhl wrote:
Checking a pointer for NULL before calling kfree() on it is redundant,
kfree() deals with NULL pointers just fine.
This patch removes such checks from files in drivers/video/
Since this is a fairly trivial change (and the same change made
everywhere) I've just made a single patch for all the
Checking a pointer for NULL before calling kfree() on it is redundant,
kfree() deals with NULL pointers just fine.
This patch removes such checks from files in drivers/video/
Since this is a fairly trivial change (and the same change made
everywhere) I've just made a single patch for all the
20 matches
Mail list logo
