Re: [PATCH] vfs: update atimes over one day in the past or future

2012-12-25 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Tuesday 2012-12-18 22:14, Dave Chinner wrote: > >> >> CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org >> >> --- >> >> fs/inode.c | 7 --- >> >> 1 ??? 4 ???(+)? 3 ???(-) >> > >> > There's something wrong with the character encoding you are using... >> >> Chinese locale, but

Re: [PATCH] vfs: update atimes over one day in the past or future

2012-12-25 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Tuesday 2012-12-18 22:14, Dave Chinner wrote: CC: sta...@vger.kernel.org --- fs/inode.c | 7 --- 1 ??? 4 ???(+)? 3 ???(-) There's something wrong with the character encoding you are using... Chinese locale, but probably doesn't matter since

Re: [PATCH] vfs: update atimes over one day in the past or future

2012-12-18 Thread Dave Chinner
heng > >> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 21:46:22 +0800 > >> Subject: [PATCH] vfs: update atimes over one day in the past or future > >> > >> Relatime should update the inode atime if it is more than one day > >> in the future. The original problem seen was a

Re: [PATCH] vfs: update atimes over one day in the past or future

2012-12-18 Thread Andreas Dilger
On 2012-12-15, at 19:15, Dave Chinner wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:25:23PM +0800, ys wrote: >> From 3d56c131b58a21c05bcd677b9d2ba915abcbf195 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: yangsheng >> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 21:46:22 +0800 >> Subject: [PATCH] v

Re: [PATCH] vfs: update atimes over one day in the past or future

2012-12-18 Thread Andreas Dilger
atimes over one day in the past or future Relatime should update the inode atime if it is more than one day in the future. The original problem seen was a tarball that had a bad atime in the distant future, but could also happen if someone fat-fingers a touch. The future atime will never

Re: [PATCH] vfs: update atimes over one day in the past or future

2012-12-18 Thread Dave Chinner
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 21:46:22 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] vfs: update atimes over one day in the past or future Relatime should update the inode atime if it is more than one day in the future. The original problem seen was a tarball that had a bad atime in the distant future, but could also

Re: [PATCH] vfs: update atimes over one day in the past or future

2012-12-15 Thread Dave Chinner
[ please place patches inline, not as attachments. ] On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:25:23PM +0800, ys wrote: > From 3d56c131b58a21c05bcd677b9d2ba915abcbf195 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: yangsheng > Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 21:46:22 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] vfs: update atimes

[PATCH] vfs: update atimes over one day in the past or future

2012-12-15 Thread ys
>From 3d56c131b58a21c05bcd677b9d2ba915abcbf195 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: yangsheng Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 21:46:22 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] vfs: update atimes over one day in the past or future Relatime should update the inode atime if it is more than one day in the future. The origi

[PATCH] vfs: update atimes over one day in the past or future

2012-12-15 Thread ys
From 3d56c131b58a21c05bcd677b9d2ba915abcbf195 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: yangsheng sick...@gmail.com Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 21:46:22 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] vfs: update atimes over one day in the past or future Relatime should update the inode atime if it is more than one day in the future

Re: [PATCH] vfs: update atimes over one day in the past or future

2012-12-15 Thread Dave Chinner
[ please place patches inline, not as attachments. ] On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:25:23PM +0800, ys wrote: From 3d56c131b58a21c05bcd677b9d2ba915abcbf195 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: yangsheng sick...@gmail.com Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 21:46:22 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] vfs: update atimes over one