On 16/03/18 16:39, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 16/03/18 16:19, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 16/03/18 14:55, Marc Zyngier wrote:
Grepping through the dts files, the documentation, and reviewing
patches, one can only notice the use of IRQ_TYPE_NONE in interrupt
specifiers. At least for the GIC, this
On 16/03/18 16:39, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 16/03/18 16:19, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 16/03/18 14:55, Marc Zyngier wrote:
Grepping through the dts files, the documentation, and reviewing
patches, one can only notice the use of IRQ_TYPE_NONE in interrupt
specifiers. At least for the GIC, this
On 16/03/18 16:19, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 16/03/18 14:55, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Grepping through the dts files, the documentation, and reviewing
>> patches, one can only notice the use of IRQ_TYPE_NONE in interrupt
>> specifiers. At least for the GIC, this doesn't mean anything. The
>>
On 16/03/18 16:19, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 16/03/18 14:55, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Grepping through the dts files, the documentation, and reviewing
>> patches, one can only notice the use of IRQ_TYPE_NONE in interrupt
>> specifiers. At least for the GIC, this doesn't mean anything. The
>>
On 16/03/18 14:55, Marc Zyngier wrote:
Grepping through the dts files, the documentation, and reviewing
patches, one can only notice the use of IRQ_TYPE_NONE in interrupt
specifiers. At least for the GIC, this doesn't mean anything. The
unsuspecting driver will end-up with whatever was there
On 16/03/18 14:55, Marc Zyngier wrote:
Grepping through the dts files, the documentation, and reviewing
patches, one can only notice the use of IRQ_TYPE_NONE in interrupt
specifiers. At least for the GIC, this doesn't mean anything. The
unsuspecting driver will end-up with whatever was there
Grepping through the dts files, the documentation, and reviewing
patches, one can only notice the use of IRQ_TYPE_NONE in interrupt
specifiers. At least for the GIC, this doesn't mean anything. The
unsuspecting driver will end-up with whatever was there before, and
there is a 50% probability that
Grepping through the dts files, the documentation, and reviewing
patches, one can only notice the use of IRQ_TYPE_NONE in interrupt
specifiers. At least for the GIC, this doesn't mean anything. The
unsuspecting driver will end-up with whatever was there before, and
there is a 50% probability that
8 matches
Mail list logo
