On 23 November 2017 at 17:54, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Thu 2017-11-23 11:38:52, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 23 November 2017 at 10:46, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> > On Thu 2017-11-23 09:23:02, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> >> On 23 November 2017 at 09:07, Pavel Machek
On 23 November 2017 at 17:54, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Thu 2017-11-23 11:38:52, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 23 November 2017 at 10:46, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> > On Thu 2017-11-23 09:23:02, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> >> On 23 November 2017 at 09:07, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> >> > Hi!
>> >> >
>> >> >>
On Thu 2017-11-23 11:38:52, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 23 November 2017 at 10:46, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Thu 2017-11-23 09:23:02, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> On 23 November 2017 at 09:07, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >> > Hi!
> >> >
> >> >> > On 22 Nov 2017, at 23:37,
On Thu 2017-11-23 11:38:52, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 23 November 2017 at 10:46, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Thu 2017-11-23 09:23:02, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> On 23 November 2017 at 09:07, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >> > Hi!
> >> >
> >> >> > On 22 Nov 2017, at 23:37, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >> >> >
On 23 November 2017 at 10:46, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Thu 2017-11-23 09:23:02, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 23 November 2017 at 09:07, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> >> > On 22 Nov 2017, at 23:37, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi!
>> >> >
>>
On 23 November 2017 at 10:46, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Thu 2017-11-23 09:23:02, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 23 November 2017 at 09:07, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> >> > On 22 Nov 2017, at 23:37, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi!
>> >> >
>> >> > If I'm willing to do timing
On Thu 2017-11-23 09:23:02, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 23 November 2017 at 09:07, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> >> > On 22 Nov 2017, at 23:37, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi!
> >> >
> >> > If I'm willing to do timing attacks to defeat KASLR... what
On Thu 2017-11-23 09:23:02, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 23 November 2017 at 09:07, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> >> > On 22 Nov 2017, at 23:37, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi!
> >> >
> >> > If I'm willing to do timing attacks to defeat KASLR... what prevents
> >> > me from using
On 23 November 2017 at 09:07, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> > On 22 Nov 2017, at 23:37, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > If I'm willing to do timing attacks to defeat KASLR... what prevents
>> > me from using CPU caches to do that?
>> >
>>
On 23 November 2017 at 09:07, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> > On 22 Nov 2017, at 23:37, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > If I'm willing to do timing attacks to defeat KASLR... what prevents
>> > me from using CPU caches to do that?
>> >
>>
>> Because it is
Hi!
> > On 22 Nov 2017, at 23:37, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > If I'm willing to do timing attacks to defeat KASLR... what prevents
> > me from using CPU caches to do that?
> >
>
> Because it is impossible to get a cache hit on an access to an
>
Hi!
> > On 22 Nov 2017, at 23:37, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > If I'm willing to do timing attacks to defeat KASLR... what prevents
> > me from using CPU caches to do that?
> >
>
> Because it is impossible to get a cache hit on an access to an
> unmapped
> On 22 Nov 2017, at 23:37, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> If I'm willing to do timing attacks to defeat KASLR... what prevents
> me from using CPU caches to do that?
>
Because it is impossible to get a cache hit on an access to an
unmapped address?
> On 22 Nov 2017, at 23:37, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> If I'm willing to do timing attacks to defeat KASLR... what prevents
> me from using CPU caches to do that?
>
Because it is impossible to get a cache hit on an access to an
unmapped address?
>>>
>>> Um,
Hi!
> >>> If I'm willing to do timing attacks to defeat KASLR... what prevents
> >>> me from using CPU caches to do that?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Because it is impossible to get a cache hit on an access to an
> >> unmapped address?
> >
> > Um, no, I don't need to be able to directly access kernel
Hi!
> >>> If I'm willing to do timing attacks to defeat KASLR... what prevents
> >>> me from using CPU caches to do that?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Because it is impossible to get a cache hit on an access to an
> >> unmapped address?
> >
> > Um, no, I don't need to be able to directly access kernel
> On 22 Nov 2017, at 22:33, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
>> On Wed 2017-11-22 21:19:28, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> On 22 November 2017 at 16:19, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
This patch series implements something along the lines of KAISER for arm64:
> On 22 Nov 2017, at 22:33, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
>> On Wed 2017-11-22 21:19:28, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> On 22 November 2017 at 16:19, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
This patch series implements something along the lines of KAISER for arm64:
On Wed 2017-11-22 19:37:14, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 05:19:14PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > This patch series implements something along the lines of KAISER for
> > > arm64:
> > >
> > > https://gruss.cc/files/kaiser.pdf
> > >
> > > although I wrote this from scratch
On Wed 2017-11-22 19:37:14, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 05:19:14PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > This patch series implements something along the lines of KAISER for
> > > arm64:
> > >
> > > https://gruss.cc/files/kaiser.pdf
> > >
> > > although I wrote this from scratch
On Wed 2017-11-22 21:19:28, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 22 November 2017 at 16:19, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> >> This patch series implements something along the lines of KAISER for arm64:
> >>
> >> https://gruss.cc/files/kaiser.pdf
> >>
> >> although I wrote this from
On Wed 2017-11-22 21:19:28, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 22 November 2017 at 16:19, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> >> This patch series implements something along the lines of KAISER for arm64:
> >>
> >> https://gruss.cc/files/kaiser.pdf
> >>
> >> although I wrote this from scratch because the
On 22 November 2017 at 16:19, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> This patch series implements something along the lines of KAISER for arm64:
>>
>> https://gruss.cc/files/kaiser.pdf
>>
>> although I wrote this from scratch because the paper has some funny
>> assumptions about how the
On 22 November 2017 at 16:19, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> This patch series implements something along the lines of KAISER for arm64:
>>
>> https://gruss.cc/files/kaiser.pdf
>>
>> although I wrote this from scratch because the paper has some funny
>> assumptions about how the architecture
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 06:20:39PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 20 November 2017 at 18:06, Will Deacon wrote:
> > I'll see if I can measure the cost of the current vbar switching to get
> > an idea of the potential performance available.
> >
>
> Yeah, makes sense. If
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 06:20:39PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 20 November 2017 at 18:06, Will Deacon wrote:
> > I'll see if I can measure the cost of the current vbar switching to get
> > an idea of the potential performance available.
> >
>
> Yeah, makes sense. If the bulk of the
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 02:50:58PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 11/17/2017 10:21 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> >This patch series implements something along the lines of KAISER for arm64:
>
> Passed some basic tests on Hikey Android and my Mustang box. I'll
> leave the Mustang building kernels for
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 05:19:14PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > This patch series implements something along the lines of KAISER for arm64:
> >
> > https://gruss.cc/files/kaiser.pdf
> >
> > although I wrote this from scratch because the paper has some funny
> > assumptions about how the
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 02:50:58PM -0800, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 11/17/2017 10:21 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> >This patch series implements something along the lines of KAISER for arm64:
>
> Passed some basic tests on Hikey Android and my Mustang box. I'll
> leave the Mustang building kernels for
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 05:19:14PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > This patch series implements something along the lines of KAISER for arm64:
> >
> > https://gruss.cc/files/kaiser.pdf
> >
> > although I wrote this from scratch because the paper has some funny
> > assumptions about how the
Hi!
> This patch series implements something along the lines of KAISER for arm64:
>
> https://gruss.cc/files/kaiser.pdf
>
> although I wrote this from scratch because the paper has some funny
> assumptions about how the architecture works. There is a patch series
> in review for x86, which
Hi!
> This patch series implements something along the lines of KAISER for arm64:
>
> https://gruss.cc/files/kaiser.pdf
>
> although I wrote this from scratch because the paper has some funny
> assumptions about how the architecture works. There is a patch series
> in review for x86, which
On 11/17/2017 10:21 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
Hi all,
This patch series implements something along the lines of KAISER for arm64:
https://gruss.cc/files/kaiser.pdf
although I wrote this from scratch because the paper has some funny
assumptions about how the architecture works. There is a
On 11/17/2017 10:21 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
Hi all,
This patch series implements something along the lines of KAISER for arm64:
https://gruss.cc/files/kaiser.pdf
although I wrote this from scratch because the paper has some funny
assumptions about how the architecture works. There is a
On 20 November 2017 at 18:06, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Ard,
>
> Cheers for having a look.
>
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 03:25:06PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 17 November 2017 at 18:21, Will Deacon wrote:
>> > This patch series implements something
On 20 November 2017 at 18:06, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Ard,
>
> Cheers for having a look.
>
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 03:25:06PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 17 November 2017 at 18:21, Will Deacon wrote:
>> > This patch series implements something along the lines of KAISER for arm64:
>>
>>
Hi Ard,
Cheers for having a look.
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 03:25:06PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 17 November 2017 at 18:21, Will Deacon wrote:
> > This patch series implements something along the lines of KAISER for arm64:
>
> Very nice! I am quite pleased, because
Hi Ard,
Cheers for having a look.
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 03:25:06PM +, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 17 November 2017 at 18:21, Will Deacon wrote:
> > This patch series implements something along the lines of KAISER for arm64:
>
> Very nice! I am quite pleased, because this makes KASLR much
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 04:19:35PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 11/17, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This patch series implements something along the lines of KAISER for arm64:
> >
> > https://gruss.cc/files/kaiser.pdf
> >
> > although I wrote this from scratch because the paper
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 04:19:35PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 11/17, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This patch series implements something along the lines of KAISER for arm64:
> >
> > https://gruss.cc/files/kaiser.pdf
> >
> > although I wrote this from scratch because the paper
On 17 November 2017 at 18:21, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch series implements something along the lines of KAISER for arm64:
>
> https://gruss.cc/files/kaiser.pdf
>
> although I wrote this from scratch because the paper has some funny
> assumptions about how
On 17 November 2017 at 18:21, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch series implements something along the lines of KAISER for arm64:
>
> https://gruss.cc/files/kaiser.pdf
>
> although I wrote this from scratch because the paper has some funny
> assumptions about how the architecture
On 11/17, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch series implements something along the lines of KAISER for arm64:
>
> https://gruss.cc/files/kaiser.pdf
>
> although I wrote this from scratch because the paper has some funny
> assumptions about how the architecture works. There is a patch
On 11/17, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch series implements something along the lines of KAISER for arm64:
>
> https://gruss.cc/files/kaiser.pdf
>
> although I wrote this from scratch because the paper has some funny
> assumptions about how the architecture works. There is a patch
Hi all,
This patch series implements something along the lines of KAISER for arm64:
https://gruss.cc/files/kaiser.pdf
although I wrote this from scratch because the paper has some funny
assumptions about how the architecture works. There is a patch series
in review for x86, which follows a
Hi all,
This patch series implements something along the lines of KAISER for arm64:
https://gruss.cc/files/kaiser.pdf
although I wrote this from scratch because the paper has some funny
assumptions about how the architecture works. There is a patch series
in review for x86, which follows a
46 matches
Mail list logo