Em Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 09:05:45AM -0400, Eric Paris escreveu:
> cc'ing Jeff Layton who has recently done a lot of getname work and I
> want to make sure he sees this.
Thanks, will try with his patchset applied, but see below...
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:56:59 -0700
> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 09:05 -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> I think we need to just use panic instead of audit_panic. This early
> at boot userspace would not have been able to tell the kernel that
> audit_panic == panic nor would the box die later if userspace ask for
> that functionality. Instead
cc'ing Jeff Layton who has recently done a lot of getname work and I
want to make sure he sees this.
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:56:59 -0700
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Al, Eric,
>
> Was this considered before? Acceptable?
>
> - Arnaldo
>
> ---
>
> Instead of an explicit hook only
* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Al, Eric,
>
> Was this considered before? Acceptable?
>
> - Arnaldo
>
> ---
>
> Instead of an explicit hook only for audit, use a tracepoint, so that
> other users that need to know about filenames can hook there just like
> audit.
>
> Based on an
* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo a...@ghostprotocols.net wrote:
Al, Eric,
Was this considered before? Acceptable?
- Arnaldo
---
Instead of an explicit hook only for audit, use a tracepoint, so that
other users that need to know about filenames can hook there just like
audit.
cc'ing Jeff Layton who has recently done a lot of getname work and I
want to make sure he sees this.
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:56:59 -0700
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo a...@ghostprotocols.net wrote:
Al, Eric,
Was this considered before? Acceptable?
- Arnaldo
---
Instead of an
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 09:05 -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
I think we need to just use panic instead of audit_panic. This early
at boot userspace would not have been able to tell the kernel that
audit_panic == panic nor would the box die later if userspace ask for
that functionality. Instead the
Em Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 09:05:45AM -0400, Eric Paris escreveu:
cc'ing Jeff Layton who has recently done a lot of getname work and I
want to make sure he sees this.
Thanks, will try with his patchset applied, but see below...
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:56:59 -0700
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Al, Eric,
Was this considered before? Acceptable?
- Arnaldo
---
Instead of an explicit hook only for audit, use a tracepoint, so that
other users that need to know about filenames can hook there just like
audit.
Based on an earlier patch by Thomas Gleixner that added the tracepoint
Al, Eric,
Was this considered before? Acceptable?
- Arnaldo
---
Instead of an explicit hook only for audit, use a tracepoint, so that
other users that need to know about filenames can hook there just like
audit.
Based on an earlier patch by Thomas Gleixner that added the tracepoint
10 matches
Mail list logo