Re: [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: sunxi: Introduce the strict flag

2017-10-06 Thread Chen-Yu Tsai
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 4:54 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Our pinctrl device should have had strict set all along. However, it wasn't > the case, and most of our old device trees also have a pinctrl group in > addition to the GPIOs properties, which mean that we

Re: [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: sunxi: Introduce the strict flag

2017-10-06 Thread Chen-Yu Tsai
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 4:54 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Our pinctrl device should have had strict set all along. However, it wasn't > the case, and most of our old device trees also have a pinctrl group in > addition to the GPIOs properties, which mean that we can't really turn it > on now. > >

[PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: sunxi: Introduce the strict flag

2017-10-05 Thread Maxime Ripard
Our pinctrl device should have had strict set all along. However, it wasn't the case, and most of our old device trees also have a pinctrl group in addition to the GPIOs properties, which mean that we can't really turn it on now. All our new SoCs don't have that group, so we should still enable

[PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: sunxi: Introduce the strict flag

2017-10-05 Thread Maxime Ripard
Our pinctrl device should have had strict set all along. However, it wasn't the case, and most of our old device trees also have a pinctrl group in addition to the GPIOs properties, which mean that we can't really turn it on now. All our new SoCs don't have that group, so we should still enable