Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 02:56:39PM -0400, Ed L Cashin wrote:
...
>> Just aoe-AOE_PARTITIONS.patch, the seventh of the twelve, should be
>> dropped.
>
> Ok, dropped.
>
>> Then later I'll send a batch of patches that will include a change to
>> make aoe disks
Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 02:56:39PM -0400, Ed L Cashin wrote:
...
Just aoe-AOE_PARTITIONS.patch, the seventh of the twelve, should be
dropped.
Ok, dropped.
Then later I'll send a batch of patches that will include a change to
make aoe disks
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 02:56:39PM -0400, Ed L Cashin wrote:
> Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> ...
> > So, which one of the aoe patches listed at:
> >
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/patches/driver/
> > do you want me to drop? This one:
> >
>
Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
> So, which one of the aoe patches listed at:
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/patches/driver/
> do you want me to drop? This one:
>
>
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 02:28:59PM -0400, Ed L Cashin wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 11:48:48AM -0500, Ed L Cashin wrote:
> >> I don't know if it matters now that we have udev. When udev manages
> >> the device nodes it all just works,
> >
>
Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 11:48:48AM -0500, Ed L Cashin wrote:
>> I don't know if it matters now that we have udev. When udev manages
>> the device nodes it all just works,
>
> But most peopel still don't use udev.
>
>> If you're saying that it's bad
Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 11:48:48AM -0500, Ed L Cashin wrote:
I don't know if it matters now that we have udev. When udev manages
the device nodes it all just works,
But most peopel still don't use udev.
If you're saying that it's bad in
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 02:28:59PM -0400, Ed L Cashin wrote:
Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 11:48:48AM -0500, Ed L Cashin wrote:
I don't know if it matters now that we have udev. When udev manages
the device nodes it all just works,
But most
Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
So, which one of the aoe patches listed at:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/patches/driver/
do you want me to drop? This one:
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 02:56:39PM -0400, Ed L Cashin wrote:
Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
So, which one of the aoe patches listed at:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/patches/driver/
do you want me to drop? This one:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 11:48:48AM -0500, Ed L Cashin wrote:
> I don't know if it matters now that we have udev. When udev manages
> the device nodes it all just works,
But most peopel still don't use udev.
> If you're saying that it's bad in principal, then that's another
> story. If that's
Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 11:06:16AM -0500, Ed L Cashin wrote:
>> >
>> > NACK. this changes devices nodes based on a compile-time option.
>>
>> I'm not sure I follow. This configuration option sets the number of
>> partitions per device in the
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 11:06:16AM -0500, Ed L Cashin wrote:
> >
> > NACK. this changes devices nodes based on a compile-time option.
>
> I'm not sure I follow. This configuration option sets the number of
> partitions per device in the driver. It doesn't create device nodes.
>
> If the
Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 07:21:28AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> support configuration of AOE_PARTITIONS from Kconfig
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ed L. Cashin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> diff -uprN a/drivers/block/Kconfig b/drivers/block/Kconfig
Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 07:21:28AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
support configuration of AOE_PARTITIONS from Kconfig
Signed-off-by: Ed L. Cashin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -uprN a/drivers/block/Kconfig b/drivers/block/Kconfig
---
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 11:06:16AM -0500, Ed L Cashin wrote:
NACK. this changes devices nodes based on a compile-time option.
I'm not sure I follow. This configuration option sets the number of
partitions per device in the driver. It doesn't create device nodes.
If the user has
Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 11:06:16AM -0500, Ed L Cashin wrote:
NACK. this changes devices nodes based on a compile-time option.
I'm not sure I follow. This configuration option sets the number of
partitions per device in the driver. It
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 11:48:48AM -0500, Ed L Cashin wrote:
I don't know if it matters now that we have udev. When udev manages
the device nodes it all just works,
But most peopel still don't use udev.
If you're saying that it's bad in principal, then that's another
story. If that's what
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 07:21:28AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> support configuration of AOE_PARTITIONS from Kconfig
>
> Signed-off-by: Ed L. Cashin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> diff -uprN a/drivers/block/Kconfig b/drivers/block/Kconfig
> --- a/drivers/block/Kconfig 2005-03-07
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 07:21:28AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
support configuration of AOE_PARTITIONS from Kconfig
Signed-off-by: Ed L. Cashin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -uprN a/drivers/block/Kconfig b/drivers/block/Kconfig
--- a/drivers/block/Kconfig 2005-03-07 17:37:58.0
support configuration of AOE_PARTITIONS from Kconfig
Signed-off-by: Ed L. Cashin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -uprN a/drivers/block/Kconfig b/drivers/block/Kconfig
--- a/drivers/block/Kconfig 2005-03-07 17:37:58.0 -0500
+++ b/drivers/block/Kconfig 2005-03-10 12:19:54.0 -0500
support configuration of AOE_PARTITIONS from Kconfig
Signed-off-by: Ed L. Cashin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -uprN a/drivers/block/Kconfig b/drivers/block/Kconfig
--- a/drivers/block/Kconfig 2005-03-07 17:37:58.0 -0500
+++ b/drivers/block/Kconfig 2005-03-10 12:19:54.0 -0500
22 matches
Mail list logo
