On 5 November 2014 20:23, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> The usage_count value can be modified from several cpus concurrently if
> !CPUFREQ_HAVE_GOVERNOR_PER_POLICY. This leads to a variety of panics in
> which the usage_count is negative or exceeds the number of cpus in the
> system. It must be switc
On Wednesday, November 05, 2014 09:53:57 AM Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> The usage_count value can be modified from several cpus concurrently if
> !CPUFREQ_HAVE_GOVERNOR_PER_POLICY. This leads to a variety of panics in
> which the usage_count is negative or exceeds the number of cpus in the
> system.
The usage_count value can be modified from several cpus concurrently if
!CPUFREQ_HAVE_GOVERNOR_PER_POLICY. This leads to a variety of panics in
which the usage_count is negative or exceeds the number of cpus in the
system. It must be switched to atomic_t and protected with a mutex to make sure
th
3 matches
Mail list logo