On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 09:39:31AM -0700, Michael Turquette wrote:
> > In my mind, the fact that we hand off the clock reference is a direct
> > result to the clock being critical (or whatever name we want to call
> > it). The hand off is a side effect, but the real information we want
> > to carry
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 09:33:56AM -0700, Michael Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Maxime Ripard (2015-08-18 08:52:03)
> > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:58:27AM -0700, Michael Turquette wrote:
> > > For example the whole big messy fuss over the DT bindings for the
> > > simple-fb driver could have been avoi
Hi Mike,
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 12:09:30PM -0700, Michael Turquette wrote:
> Some clocks are critical to system operation (e.g. cpu, memory, etc) and
> should not be gated until a driver that knows best claims such a clock
> and expressly gates that clock through the normal clk.h api.
>
> The ty
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:58:27AM -0700, Michael Turquette wrote:
> For example the whole big messy fuss over the DT bindings for the
> simple-fb driver could have been avoided if this feature had existed
> then.
Not really, there was additional issues that would have prevented to
use that in sim
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 8:17 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> I think that we can come up with a reasonable DT wrapper around the
> >> flag. I will be ecstatic if we can agree that the meaning of the flag
> >> can be tweaked just a bit to mean, "prevent t
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 8:17 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> I think that we can come up with a reasonable DT wrapper around the
>> flag. I will be ecstatic if we can agree that the meaning of the flag
>> can be tweaked just a bit to mean, "prevent this critical clock from
>> being disabled, as it was ena
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, Michael Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Lee Jones (2015-08-11 01:43:29)
> > On Mon, 10 Aug 2015, Michael Turquette wrote:
> > > Quoting Lee Jones (2015-08-10 07:48:11)
> > > > On Fri, 07 Aug 2015, Michael Turquette wrote:
> > > This series is solving the following problems:
> > >
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, Michael Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Maxime Coquelin (2015-08-11 03:02:23)
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > On 08/11/2015 10:43 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Mon, 10 Aug 2015, Michael Turquette wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ST's driver is an unfortunate case. All of the clock data was
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, Michael Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Geert Uytterhoeven (2015-08-11 03:11:05)
> > Hi Maxime,
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Maxime Coquelin
> > wrote:
> > > How can we pass CLK_ENABLE_HAND_OFF flag to a specific clock on STi
> > > platform?
> >
> > Add the flag to
Quoting Maxime Coquelin (2015-08-11 03:02:23)
> Hi Mike,
>
> On 08/11/2015 10:43 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Aug 2015, Michael Turquette wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> ST's driver is an unfortunate case. All of the clock data was shoved
> >> into DT before we had a clue that doing so is a terri
Quoting Geert Uytterhoeven (2015-08-11 03:11:05)
> Hi Maxime,
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Maxime Coquelin
> wrote:
> > How can we pass CLK_ENABLE_HAND_OFF flag to a specific clock on STi
> > platform?
>
> Add the flag to the relevant clocks in the C code, e.g. in
> clk_register_flexgen
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> On 08/11/2015 01:49 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Maxime Coquelin
>> wrote:
>>> On 08/11/2015 01:36 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
On 08/11/2015 12:11 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11,
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Maxime Coquelin
> wrote:
> > On 08/11/2015 01:36 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> >> On 08/11/2015 12:11 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Maxime Coquelin
> >>> wrot
On 08/11/2015 01:49 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Maxime,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
On 08/11/2015 01:36 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
On 08/11/2015 12:11 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Maxime Coquelin
wrote:
How can we pass C
Hi Maxime,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> On 08/11/2015 01:36 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>> On 08/11/2015 12:11 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Maxime Coquelin
>>> wrote:
How can we pass CLK_ENABLE_HAND_OFF flag to a specific cl
Sorry Geert, my reply has been cut:
On 08/11/2015 01:36 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
Hi Geert,
On 08/11/2015 12:11 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Maxime,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Maxime Coquelin
wrote:
How can we pass CLK_ENABLE_HAND_OFF flag to a specific clock on STi
platform?
A
Hi Geert,
On 08/11/2015 12:11 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Maxime,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Maxime Coquelin
wrote:
How can we pass CLK_ENABLE_HAND_OFF flag to a specific clock on STi
platform?
Add the flag to the relevant clocks in the C code, e.g. in
clk_register_flexgen():
Hi Maxime,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Maxime Coquelin
wrote:
> How can we pass CLK_ENABLE_HAND_OFF flag to a specific clock on STi
> platform?
Add the flag to the relevant clocks in the C code, e.g. in
clk_register_flexgen():
if (!strcmp(name, "clk-icn-cpu"))
init
Hi Mike,
On 08/11/2015 10:43 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015, Michael Turquette wrote:
ST's driver is an unfortunate case. All of the clock data was shoved
into DT before we had a clue that doing so is a terrible idea.
I tend to agree, and wouldn't do it this way if we could rewri
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015, Michael Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Lee Jones (2015-08-10 07:48:11)
> > On Fri, 07 Aug 2015, Michael Turquette wrote:
> >
> > > Some clocks are critical to system operation (e.g. cpu, memory, etc) and
> > > should not be gated until a driver that knows best claims such a clock
On Fri, 07 Aug 2015, Michael Turquette wrote:
> Some clocks are critical to system operation (e.g. cpu, memory, etc) and
> should not be gated until a driver that knows best claims such a clock
> and expressly gates that clock through the normal clk.h api.
>
> The typical way to handle this is fo
Some clocks are critical to system operation (e.g. cpu, memory, etc) and
should not be gated until a driver that knows best claims such a clock
and expressly gates that clock through the normal clk.h api.
The typical way to handle this is for the clk driver or some other early
code to call clk_pre
22 matches
Mail list logo
