From: ebied...@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 10:17:02 -0700
>
> Since I am motivated to get things done, and since there has been much
> grumbling about my patches not implementing tunables, I have added
> tunable support on top of my last patchset.
>
> I have
From: ebied...@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 10:17:02 -0700
Since I am motivated to get things done, and since there has been much
grumbling about my patches not implementing tunables, I have added
tunable support on top of my last patchset.
I have performed
On 08/07/2012 01:17 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Since I am motivated to get things done, and since there has been much
grumbling about my patches not implementing tunables, I have added
tunable support on top of my last patchset.
I have performed basic testing on the these patches and nothing
On 08/14/2012 05:14 PM, David Miller wrote:
Come on Vlad, please review this stuff some time this century. If you
want inclusion to be dependent upon your review, then the onus is on
you to review it in a timely manner. And you are not doing so here.
I'm not letting Eric's patches rot in
Come on Vlad, please review this stuff some time this century. If you
want inclusion to be dependent upon your review, then the onus is on
you to review it in a timely manner. And you are not doing so here.
I'm not letting Eric's patches rot in patchwork for more than a week,
this is
Come on Vlad, please review this stuff some time this century. If you
want inclusion to be dependent upon your review, then the onus is on
you to review it in a timely manner. And you are not doing so here.
I'm not letting Eric's patches rot in patchwork for more than a week,
this is
On 08/14/2012 05:14 PM, David Miller wrote:
Come on Vlad, please review this stuff some time this century. If you
want inclusion to be dependent upon your review, then the onus is on
you to review it in a timely manner. And you are not doing so here.
I'm not letting Eric's patches rot in
On 08/07/2012 01:17 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Since I am motivated to get things done, and since there has been much
grumbling about my patches not implementing tunables, I have added
tunable support on top of my last patchset.
I have performed basic testing on the these patches and nothing
On 08/09/2012 02:20 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: ebied...@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 10:17:02 -0700
Since I am motivated to get things done, and since there has been much
grumbling about my patches not implementing tunables, I have added
tunable support on top of
From: ebied...@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 10:17:02 -0700
> Since I am motivated to get things done, and since there has been much
> grumbling about my patches not implementing tunables, I have added
> tunable support on top of my last patchset.
>
> I have performed
From: ebied...@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 10:17:02 -0700
Since I am motivated to get things done, and since there has been much
grumbling about my patches not implementing tunables, I have added
tunable support on top of my last patchset.
I have performed basic
On 08/09/2012 02:20 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: ebied...@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 10:17:02 -0700
Since I am motivated to get things done, and since there has been much
grumbling about my patches not implementing tunables, I have added
tunable support on top of
Since I am motivated to get things done, and since there has been much
grumbling about my patches not implementing tunables, I have added
tunable support on top of my last patchset.
I have performed basic testing on the these patches and nothing
appears amis.
The sm statemachine is a major
Since I am motivated to get things done, and since there has been much
grumbling about my patches not implementing tunables, I have added
tunable support on top of my last patchset.
I have performed basic testing on the these patches and nothing
appears amis.
The sm statemachine is a major
14 matches
Mail list logo
