Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: tegra: enforce PM requirement

2019-02-27 Thread Thierry Reding
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 09:13:08AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 01:55:37PM +0530, Sameer Pujar wrote: > > The requirement for this came while adding runtime PM support for HDA > > driver. There were concerns about driver explicitly handling !PM case. > >

Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: tegra: enforce PM requirement

2019-02-26 Thread Sameer Pujar
On 2/26/2019 10:22 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: 26.02.2019 12:13, Russell King - ARM Linux admin пишет: On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 01:55:37PM +0530, Sameer Pujar wrote: The requirement for this came while adding runtime PM support for HDA driver. There were concerns about driver explicitly

Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: tegra: enforce PM requirement

2019-02-26 Thread Sameer Pujar
On 2/26/2019 8:16 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: 26.02.2019 11:25, Sameer Pujar пишет: The requirement for this came while adding runtime PM support for HDA driver. There were concerns about driver explicitly handling !PM case. In general, drivers need to handle !PM case with work arounds for

Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: tegra: enforce PM requirement

2019-02-26 Thread Dmitry Osipenko
26.02.2019 12:13, Russell King - ARM Linux admin пишет: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 01:55:37PM +0530, Sameer Pujar wrote: >> The requirement for this came while adding runtime PM support for HDA >> driver. There were concerns about driver explicitly handling !PM case. >> In general, drivers need to

Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: tegra: enforce PM requirement

2019-02-26 Thread Dmitry Osipenko
26.02.2019 11:25, Sameer Pujar пишет: > The requirement for this came while adding runtime PM support for HDA > driver. There were concerns about driver explicitly handling !PM case. > In general, drivers need to handle !PM case with work arounds for > managing clocks and power explicitly, which

Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: tegra: enforce PM requirement

2019-02-26 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux admin
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 01:55:37PM +0530, Sameer Pujar wrote: > The requirement for this came while adding runtime PM support for HDA > driver. There were concerns about driver explicitly handling !PM case. > In general, drivers need to handle !PM case with work arounds for > managing clocks and

[PATCH v2] ARM: tegra: enforce PM requirement

2019-02-26 Thread Sameer Pujar
The requirement for this came while adding runtime PM support for HDA driver. There were concerns about driver explicitly handling !PM case. In general, drivers need to handle !PM case with work arounds for managing clocks and power explicitly, which is not really necessary when PM support on