On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 05:37:16PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 04/21, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Now that we have a clk registration API that doesn't return
> > struct clks, we need to have some way to hand out struct clks via
> > the clk_get() APIs that doesn't involve associating struct clk
> >
On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 05:37:16PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 04/21, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Now that we have a clk registration API that doesn't return
> > struct clks, we need to have some way to hand out struct clks via
> > the clk_get() APIs that doesn't involve associating struct clk
> >
On 04/21, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Now that we have a clk registration API that doesn't return
> struct clks, we need to have some way to hand out struct clks via
> the clk_get() APIs that doesn't involve associating struct clk
> pointers with a struct clk_lookup. Luckily, clkdev already
> operates
On 04/21, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Now that we have a clk registration API that doesn't return
> struct clks, we need to have some way to hand out struct clks via
> the clk_get() APIs that doesn't involve associating struct clk
> pointers with a struct clk_lookup. Luckily, clkdev already
> operates
Now that we have a clk registration API that doesn't return
struct clks, we need to have some way to hand out struct clks via
the clk_get() APIs that doesn't involve associating struct clk
pointers with a struct clk_lookup. Luckily, clkdev already
operates on struct clk_hw pointers, except for the
Now that we have a clk registration API that doesn't return
struct clks, we need to have some way to hand out struct clks via
the clk_get() APIs that doesn't involve associating struct clk
pointers with a struct clk_lookup. Luckily, clkdev already
operates on struct clk_hw pointers, except for the
6 matches
Mail list logo