Hi Maxime,
Thank you for the patch.
On Wednesday 22 October 2014 17:43:25 Maxime Ripard wrote:
> The previous code was relying on the fact that the slave_caps were to be
> defined on a per channel basis.
>
> However, this proved to be a bit overkill, since every driver filling these
> so far
The previous code was relying on the fact that the slave_caps were to be
defined on a per channel basis.
However, this proved to be a bit overkill, since every driver filling these so
far were hardcoding it, disregarding which channel was actually given.
Add these capabilities to the dma_device
The previous code was relying on the fact that the slave_caps were to be
defined on a per channel basis.
However, this proved to be a bit overkill, since every driver filling these so
far were hardcoding it, disregarding which channel was actually given.
Add these capabilities to the dma_device
Hi Maxime,
Thank you for the patch.
On Wednesday 22 October 2014 17:43:25 Maxime Ripard wrote:
The previous code was relying on the fact that the slave_caps were to be
defined on a per channel basis.
However, this proved to be a bit overkill, since every driver filling these
so far were
4 matches
Mail list logo
