On 28-03-19, 11:33, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> There is not reason for the minimum iowait boost value in the
> schedutil cpufreq governor to depend on the available range of CPU
> frequencies. In fact, that dependency is generally confusing,
> because it causes the
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 11:27:25AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, March 28, 2019 11:33:21 AM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >
> > There is not reason for the minimum iowait boost value in the
> > schedutil cpufreq governor to depend on the available
On Thursday, March 28, 2019 11:33:21 AM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> There is not reason for the minimum iowait boost value in the
> schedutil cpufreq governor to depend on the available range of CPU
> frequencies. In fact, that dependency is generally confusing,
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
There is not reason for the minimum iowait boost value in the
schedutil cpufreq governor to depend on the available range of CPU
frequencies. In fact, that dependency is generally confusing,
because it causes the iowait boost to behave somewhat differently
on CPUs with
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:48 AM Quentin Perret wrote:
>
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On Tuesday 26 Mar 2019 at 12:18:00 (+0100), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
> > #include
> > #include
> >
> > +#define IOWAIT_BOOST_MIN (SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE / 8)
> > +
> > struct sugov_tunables {
>
Hi Rafael,
On Tuesday 26 Mar 2019 at 12:18:00 (+0100), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
> #include
> #include
>
> +#define IOWAIT_BOOST_MIN (SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE / 8)
> +
> struct sugov_tunables {
> struct gov_attr_set attr_set;
> unsigned int
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
There is not reason for the minimum iowait boost value in the
schedutil cpufreq governor to depend on the available range of CPU
frequencies. In fact, that dependency is generally confusing,
because it causes the iowait boost to behave somewhat differently
on CPUs with
7 matches
Mail list logo
