Re: [PATCH v4 00/58] dmaengine: Implement generic slave capabilities retrieval

2014-11-13 Thread Vinod Koul
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 02:15:02PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 04:55:29PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 03:33:49PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > Hi Vinod, > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:25:15PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > >

Re: [PATCH v4 00/58] dmaengine: Implement generic slave capabilities retrieval

2014-11-13 Thread Vinod Koul
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 02:15:02PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: Hi, On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 04:55:29PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 03:33:49PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: Hi Vinod, On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:25:15PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: Hi, As

Re: [PATCH v4 00/58] dmaengine: Implement generic slave capabilities retrieval

2014-11-12 Thread Maxime Ripard
Hi, On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 04:55:29PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 03:33:49PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Hi Vinod, > > > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:25:15PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > As we discussed a couple of weeks ago, this is the third

Re: [PATCH v4 00/58] dmaengine: Implement generic slave capabilities retrieval

2014-11-12 Thread Vinod Koul
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 03:33:49PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi Vinod, > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:25:15PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As we discussed a couple of weeks ago, this is the third attempt at > > creating a generic behaviour for slave capabilities retrieval so

Re: [PATCH v4 00/58] dmaengine: Implement generic slave capabilities retrieval

2014-11-12 Thread Vinod Koul
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 03:33:49PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: Hi Vinod, On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:25:15PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: Hi, As we discussed a couple of weeks ago, this is the third attempt at creating a generic behaviour for slave capabilities retrieval so that

Re: [PATCH v4 00/58] dmaengine: Implement generic slave capabilities retrieval

2014-11-12 Thread Maxime Ripard
Hi, On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 04:55:29PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 03:33:49PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: Hi Vinod, On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:25:15PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: Hi, As we discussed a couple of weeks ago, this is the third attempt at

Re: [PATCH v4 00/58] dmaengine: Implement generic slave capabilities retrieval

2014-11-06 Thread Maxime Ripard
Hi Vinod, On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:25:15PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi, > > As we discussed a couple of weeks ago, this is the third attempt at > creating a generic behaviour for slave capabilities retrieval so that > generic layers using dmaengine can actually rely on that. > > That has

Re: [PATCH v4 00/58] dmaengine: Implement generic slave capabilities retrieval

2014-11-06 Thread Maxime Ripard
Hi Vinod, On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:25:15PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: Hi, As we discussed a couple of weeks ago, this is the third attempt at creating a generic behaviour for slave capabilities retrieval so that generic layers using dmaengine can actually rely on that. That has been

[PATCH v4 00/58] dmaengine: Implement generic slave capabilities retrieval

2014-10-28 Thread Maxime Ripard
Hi, As we discussed a couple of weeks ago, this is the third attempt at creating a generic behaviour for slave capabilities retrieval so that generic layers using dmaengine can actually rely on that. That has been done mostly through two steps: by moving out the sub-commands of the

[PATCH v4 00/58] dmaengine: Implement generic slave capabilities retrieval

2014-10-28 Thread Maxime Ripard
Hi, As we discussed a couple of weeks ago, this is the third attempt at creating a generic behaviour for slave capabilities retrieval so that generic layers using dmaengine can actually rely on that. That has been done mostly through two steps: by moving out the sub-commands of the