Hi,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on v4.16-rc4]
[also build test ERROR on next-20180316]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Hi,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on v4.16-rc4]
[also build test ERROR on next-20180316]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Resent to address reviewer comments.
Currently, the VDSO does not handle
clock_gettime( CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW, )
on Intel / AMD - it calls
vdso_fallback_gettime()
for this clock, which issues a syscall, having an unacceptably high
latency (minimum measurable time or time between
Resent to address reviewer comments.
Currently, the VDSO does not handle
clock_gettime( CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW, )
on Intel / AMD - it calls
vdso_fallback_gettime()
for this clock, which issues a syscall, having an unacceptably high
latency (minimum measurable time or time between
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vclock_gettime.c
b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vclock_gettime.c
index f19856d..8b9b9cf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vclock_gettime.c
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vclock_gettime.c
@@ -182,27 +182,49 @@ notrace static u64 vread_tsc(void)
return last;
}
-notrace
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vclock_gettime.c
b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vclock_gettime.c
index f19856d..8b9b9cf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vclock_gettime.c
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vclock_gettime.c
@@ -182,27 +182,49 @@ notrace static u64 vread_tsc(void)
return last;
}
-notrace
6 matches
Mail list logo