Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] dt-bindings: i2c: Discard i2c-slave flag from the DW I2C example

2020-06-08 Thread Rob Herring
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:58 PM Serge Semin wrote: > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 09:45:37PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 09:42:01PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 09:22:56PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:13:38PM

Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] dt-bindings: i2c: Discard i2c-slave flag from the DW I2C example

2020-05-29 Thread Serge Semin
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 09:45:37PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 09:42:01PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 09:22:56PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:13:38PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at

Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] dt-bindings: i2c: Discard i2c-slave flag from the DW I2C example

2020-05-29 Thread Serge Semin
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 09:42:01PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 09:22:56PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:13:38PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 06:33:51PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > > > > you're sending > > > new

Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] dt-bindings: i2c: Discard i2c-slave flag from the DW I2C example

2020-05-29 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 09:22:56PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:13:38PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 06:33:51PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > > you're sending > > new versions too fast. Give people time to review. > > Yeah, you did. Sorry for

Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] dt-bindings: i2c: Discard i2c-slave flag from the DW I2C example

2020-05-29 Thread Serge Semin
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:13:38PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 06:33:51PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > > Rob, > > Could you pay attention to this patch? The patchset review procedure is > > nearly over, while the DT part is only partly reviewed by you. > > Pretty sure I

Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] dt-bindings: i2c: Discard i2c-slave flag from the DW I2C example

2020-05-29 Thread Rob Herring
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 06:33:51PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > Rob, > Could you pay attention to this patch? The patchset review procedure is > nearly over, while the DT part is only partly reviewed by you. Pretty sure I commented on this. Not sure what version, you're sending new versions too

Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] dt-bindings: i2c: Discard i2c-slave flag from the DW I2C example

2020-05-27 Thread Serge Semin
Rob, Could you pay attention to this patch? The patchset review procedure is nearly over, while the DT part is only partly reviewed by you. Thanks -Sergey On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 06:30:37PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > dtc currently doesn't support I2C_OWN_SLAVE_ADDRESS flag set in the > i2c

[PATCH v5 02/11] dt-bindings: i2c: Discard i2c-slave flag from the DW I2C example

2020-05-27 Thread Serge Semin
dtc currently doesn't support I2C_OWN_SLAVE_ADDRESS flag set in the i2c "reg" property. If it is the compiler will print a warning: Warning (i2c_bus_reg): /example-2/i2c@112/eeprom@64: I2C bus unit address format error, expected "4064" Warning (i2c_bus_reg):