Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Add coupled regulators mechanism

2018-03-16 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Maciej Purski [180312 12:24]: > On 03/09/2018 04:58 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Mark Brown [180309 12:43]: > > > On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 01:22:02PM +0100, Maciej Purski wrote: > > > > > > > I would like to kindly ask Fabio Estevam and Tony Lindgren

Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Add coupled regulators mechanism

2018-03-16 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Maciej Purski [180312 12:24]: > On 03/09/2018 04:58 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Mark Brown [180309 12:43]: > > > On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 01:22:02PM +0100, Maciej Purski wrote: > > > > > > > I would like to kindly ask Fabio Estevam and Tony Lindgren to test the > > > > patch > > > > series

Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Add coupled regulators mechanism

2018-03-12 Thread Maciej Purski
On 03/09/2018 04:58 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: * Mark Brown [180309 12:43]: On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 01:22:02PM +0100, Maciej Purski wrote: I would like to kindly ask Fabio Estevam and Tony Lindgren to test the patch series on their boards. I gave it a quick try and this

Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Add coupled regulators mechanism

2018-03-12 Thread Maciej Purski
On 03/09/2018 04:58 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: * Mark Brown [180309 12:43]: On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 01:22:02PM +0100, Maciej Purski wrote: I would like to kindly ask Fabio Estevam and Tony Lindgren to test the patch series on their boards. I gave it a quick try and this set still causes at

Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Add coupled regulators mechanism

2018-03-12 Thread Maciej Purski
On 03/09/2018 01:56 PM, Mark Brown wrote: On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 01:50:20PM +0100, Maciej Purski wrote: On 03/09/2018 01:42 PM, Mark Brown wrote: Is it possible to respin this in terms of the test/coupled branch in my git tree? There were a bunch of build fixes that got sent and I don't

Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Add coupled regulators mechanism

2018-03-12 Thread Maciej Purski
On 03/09/2018 01:56 PM, Mark Brown wrote: On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 01:50:20PM +0100, Maciej Purski wrote: On 03/09/2018 01:42 PM, Mark Brown wrote: Is it possible to respin this in terms of the test/coupled branch in my git tree? There were a bunch of build fixes that got sent and I don't

Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Add coupled regulators mechanism

2018-03-09 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Mark Brown [180309 12:43]: > On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 01:22:02PM +0100, Maciej Purski wrote: > > > I would like to kindly ask Fabio Estevam and Tony Lindgren to test the patch > > series on their boards. I gave it a quick try and this set still causes at least mmc0 to fail

Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Add coupled regulators mechanism

2018-03-09 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Mark Brown [180309 12:43]: > On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 01:22:02PM +0100, Maciej Purski wrote: > > > I would like to kindly ask Fabio Estevam and Tony Lindgren to test the patch > > series on their boards. I gave it a quick try and this set still causes at least mmc0 to fail for me. Regards,

Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Add coupled regulators mechanism

2018-03-09 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 01:50:20PM +0100, Maciej Purski wrote: > On 03/09/2018 01:42 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > Is it possible to respin this in terms of the test/coupled branch in my > > git tree? There were a bunch of build fixes that got sent and I don't > > want to loose any of those. > I

Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Add coupled regulators mechanism

2018-03-09 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 01:50:20PM +0100, Maciej Purski wrote: > On 03/09/2018 01:42 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > Is it possible to respin this in terms of the test/coupled branch in my > > git tree? There were a bunch of build fixes that got sent and I don't > > want to loose any of those. > I

Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Add coupled regulators mechanism

2018-03-09 Thread Maciej Purski
On 03/09/2018 01:42 PM, Mark Brown wrote: On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 01:22:02PM +0100, Maciej Purski wrote: I would like to kindly ask Fabio Estevam and Tony Lindgren to test the patch series on their boards. That'd be great, yeah - I can run some tests with kernelci as well, though the

Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Add coupled regulators mechanism

2018-03-09 Thread Maciej Purski
On 03/09/2018 01:42 PM, Mark Brown wrote: On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 01:22:02PM +0100, Maciej Purski wrote: I would like to kindly ask Fabio Estevam and Tony Lindgren to test the patch series on their boards. That'd be great, yeah - I can run some tests with kernelci as well, though the

Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Add coupled regulators mechanism

2018-03-09 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 01:22:02PM +0100, Maciej Purski wrote: > I would like to kindly ask Fabio Estevam and Tony Lindgren to test the patch > series on their boards. That'd be great, yeah - I can run some tests with kernelci as well, though the latency is relatively high there. Is it possible

Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Add coupled regulators mechanism

2018-03-09 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 01:22:02PM +0100, Maciej Purski wrote: > I would like to kindly ask Fabio Estevam and Tony Lindgren to test the patch > series on their boards. That'd be great, yeah - I can run some tests with kernelci as well, though the latency is relatively high there. Is it possible

[PATCH v6 0/5] Add coupled regulators mechanism

2018-03-09 Thread Maciej Purski
Hi all, this patchset adds a new mechanism to the framework - regulators' coupling. On Odroid XU3/4 and other Exynos5422 based boards there is a case, that different devices on the board are supplied by different regulators with non-fixed voltages. If one of these devices temporarily requires

[PATCH v6 0/5] Add coupled regulators mechanism

2018-03-09 Thread Maciej Purski
Hi all, this patchset adds a new mechanism to the framework - regulators' coupling. On Odroid XU3/4 and other Exynos5422 based boards there is a case, that different devices on the board are supplied by different regulators with non-fixed voltages. If one of these devices temporarily requires