Re: [RFC] Migrate to Hz resolution for OPP binding

2014-05-22 Thread Sören Brinkmann
Hi Rob, On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 08:27AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Sören Brinkmann > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I guess this is just to evaluate how big the lynch mob will be. Anyway: > > Triggered by this discussion https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/15/46, I > > looked a

Re: [RFC] Migrate to Hz resolution for OPP binding

2014-05-22 Thread Rob Herring
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote: > Hi, > > I guess this is just to evaluate how big the lynch mob will be. Anyway: > Triggered by this discussion https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/15/46, I > looked a little into what it would take to migrate everybody to Hz > frequency

Re: [RFC] Migrate to Hz resolution for OPP binding

2014-05-22 Thread Rob Herring
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Sören Brinkmann soren.brinkm...@xilinx.com wrote: Hi, I guess this is just to evaluate how big the lynch mob will be. Anyway: Triggered by this discussion https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/15/46, I looked a little into what it would take to migrate everybody to Hz

Re: [RFC] Migrate to Hz resolution for OPP binding

2014-05-22 Thread Sören Brinkmann
Hi Rob, On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 08:27AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Sören Brinkmann soren.brinkm...@xilinx.com wrote: Hi, I guess this is just to evaluate how big the lynch mob will be. Anyway: Triggered by this discussion https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/15/46,

Re: [RFC] Migrate to Hz resolution for OPP binding

2014-05-21 Thread Pavel Machek
> > As plan B, I was thinking to add the property 'operating-points-hz'... > > > > Any better ideas? > > property operating-points-hz as a bool perhaps -> that modifies the > description and maintains legacy dtb support sounds OK to me if DT > folks and Rafael are ok with it as well. That

Re: [RFC] Migrate to Hz resolution for OPP binding

2014-05-21 Thread Pavel Machek
As plan B, I was thinking to add the property 'operating-points-hz'... Any better ideas? property operating-points-hz as a bool perhaps - that modifies the description and maintains legacy dtb support sounds OK to me if DT folks and Rafael are ok with it as well. That should like a

Re: [RFC] Migrate to Hz resolution for OPP binding

2014-05-20 Thread Nishanth Menon
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote: > Hi, > > I guess this is just to evaluate how big the lynch mob will be. Anyway: > Triggered by this discussion https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/15/46, I > looked a little into what it would take to migrate everybody to Hz > frequency

[RFC] Migrate to Hz resolution for OPP binding

2014-05-20 Thread Sören Brinkmann
Hi, I guess this is just to evaluate how big the lynch mob will be. Anyway: Triggered by this discussion https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/15/46, I looked a little into what it would take to migrate everybody to Hz frequency resolutions to avoid all the conversions between cpufreq, CCF, OPPs, etc.

[RFC] Migrate to Hz resolution for OPP binding

2014-05-20 Thread Sören Brinkmann
Hi, I guess this is just to evaluate how big the lynch mob will be. Anyway: Triggered by this discussion https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/15/46, I looked a little into what it would take to migrate everybody to Hz frequency resolutions to avoid all the conversions between cpufreq, CCF, OPPs, etc.

Re: [RFC] Migrate to Hz resolution for OPP binding

2014-05-20 Thread Nishanth Menon
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Sören Brinkmann soren.brinkm...@xilinx.com wrote: Hi, I guess this is just to evaluate how big the lynch mob will be. Anyway: Triggered by this discussion https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/15/46, I looked a little into what it would take to migrate everybody to Hz