On 07/08/16 12:20, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 07/08/16 00:26, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>>> On Jul 7, 2016, at 10:15 , David Gibson wrote:
>>>
>
> < snip >
>
>>> Given that we're going to need new code to support this new connector
>>> model, I think we should also fix some of the u
On 07/07/16 00:15, David Gibson wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 04:55:49PM -0700, frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Frank Rowand
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> This is version 2 of this email.
>>
>> Changes from version 1:
>>
>> - some rewording of the text
>> - removed new (theoretical) dtc direct
On 07/08/16 00:26, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi David,
>
>> On Jul 7, 2016, at 10:15 , David Gibson wrote:
>>
< snip >
>> Given that we're going to need new code to support this new connector
>> model, I think we should also fix some of the uglies in the current
>> overlay format while we're a
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 10:26:15AM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> > On Jul 7, 2016, at 10:15 , David Gibson wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 04:55:49PM -0700, frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> From: Frank Rowand
> >>
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> This is version 2 of this ema
Hi David,
> On Jul 7, 2016, at 10:15 , David Gibson wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 04:55:49PM -0700, frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Frank Rowand
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> This is version 2 of this email.
>>
>> Changes from version 1:
>>
>> - some rewording of the text
>> - removed n
On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 04:55:49PM -0700, frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Frank Rowand
>
> Hi All,
>
> This is version 2 of this email.
>
> Changes from version 1:
>
> - some rewording of the text
> - removed new (theoretical) dtc directive "/connector/"
> - added compatibility bet
On 07/05/16 11:01, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> Sorry for taking a bit to reply, had to grok it well first.
>
>> On Jul 3, 2016, at 02:55 , frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> From: Frank Rowand
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> This is version 2 of this email.
>>
>> Changes from version 1:
>>
>>
Hi Frank,
Sorry for taking a bit to reply, had to grok it well first.
> On Jul 3, 2016, at 02:55 , frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> From: Frank Rowand
>
> Hi All,
>
> This is version 2 of this email.
>
> Changes from version 1:
>
> - some rewording of the text
> - removed new (theoretica
On 07/04/16 08:22, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 04:55:49PM -0700, frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> This is an extremely simple example to illustrate the concepts. It is not
>> meant to represent the complexity of a real board.
>>
>> To start with, assume that the device that will
On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 04:55:49PM -0700, frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
> This is an extremely simple example to illustrate the concepts. It is not
> meant to represent the complexity of a real board.
>
> To start with, assume that the device that will eventually be on a daughter
> board is firs
On 07/02/16 16:55, frowand.l...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Frank Rowand
>
> Hi All,
>
> This is version 2 of this email.
< snip >
> The one remaining piece that this patch does not provide is how
> the overlay manager (which does not yet exist in the mainline
> tree) can apply an overlay to two
From: Frank Rowand
Hi All,
This is version 2 of this email.
Changes from version 1:
- some rewording of the text
- removed new (theoretical) dtc directive "/connector/"
- added compatibility between mother board and daughter board
- added info on applying a single .dtbo to different co
12 matches
Mail list logo